Michael Scheuer | Non-Intervention

As ridiculous as current politics seem, there is still, even for an elderly fellow like me, a large amount that can be learned by listening to what now is being said and then comparing it against personal experience. I have just completed such a comparison.

First, a decade and more ago, before I was banished by the American media for opposing Israel’s dominance of U.S. policy in the Muslim world, I frequently appeared on Neil Cavuto’s program on FOX News. Mr. Cavuto always struck me as a most thoughtful and fair-minded individual, perhaps more so than any other television interviewer I was dealing with at the time, with the exception of Lou Dobbs, also of FOX.

As it nears three full-years since President Trump was elected, it has struck me strongly that I made an erroneous assessment of Mr. Cavuto, either because he is a master of deceit or because I was stupid. The latter always is a possibility.

Today, however, I lean toward believing Mr. Cavuto is a deceitful person. For the past three years, Mr. Cavuto – now hosting important programs on both FOX News and FOX Business – has used every opportunity to overtly or implicitly criticize and undermine Mr. Trump. I catch parts of both programs each day in the car and Mr. Cavuto’s snide attacks on the president, his policies, and his accomplishments are unrelenting. Indeed, there are many programs on which Mr. Cavuto is joined by a loud-mouthed, but more frank Trump-hater named Charlie Gasparino so they can do some team-bashing of Trump. Gasparino is always praised as an “elite” business journalist, and he may well be. That said, he strikes me as being better described as an arrogant worm who cannot keep his mouth shut.

What really hit a nerve with me about Mr. Cavuto’s deceitfulness is that he currently is orchestrating a broad advertising campaign on FOX Business in which he and many of the other FOX Business anchors and reporters are shown declaring their sincere dedication to making sure that that the network’s viewers will have the best information so they can realize the “American dream”, at least in the economic realm.

I would like to believe that this is the goal of all the speakers –  and I am sure of Dobbs, Varney, Maria Bartiromo, and Payne on that score – but for Mr. Cavuto and his side-kick Gasparino to claim that they share that goal is absurd. For three years, this pair have done nothing but attack, ridicule, and generally deprecate the man whose administration has resuscitated the republic’s economy from its near-death status, a development that also has caused many Americans to again think that they and their kids may have a crack at achieving that American dream.

But if Mr. Cavuto and FOX Business really do want to help everyday Americans advance economically, why are Mr. Cavuto and the thug-like Gasparino so eager to deliver the citizenry to one or another of the demented, deviant, and/or criminal Democratic presidential candidates, each of whom is pledged to destroy the economic recovery now underway, to raise taxes on middle-and-lower class Americans, to disarm Americans, to kill unborn and just-born Americans, and to make dead letters for Americans of their Constitution and the Bill of Rights?

That, it seems to me, is a question in need of asking. It also is one that certainly demands an answer framed in that quaint, old adage “truth in advertising”.

So, President Trump again makes good on a campaign pledge and gets more U.S. military personnel out of harm’s way. Naturally, the usual culprits are whining and crying tears of blood for our “Kurd allies”. Senators McConnell and Graham, and treacherous McCain’s ghost are leading the attack on Trump, sounding as if the president has done the wrong thing. No doubt Bill Crystal, Max Boot, and all of the retired, never-won a-war general officers on retainer as war-mongers with the media networks will join the chorus of abuse, which will be amplified by other Neocons, Israel-Firsters, and as soon as the latter can deliver 535 emergency cash bribes, almost all of the U.S. Congress. We have heard and will always hear this kind of war-mongering in disguise as patriotism and loyalty-to-allies whenever the president shuts down an unnecessary and ultimately losing interventionist war.  Let the opposing bastards wail long and loud; hopefully, each will pick up a cat-o’-nine-tails and scourge themselves as the whine and weep. Trump did what was right for the only nation that matters, and that’s the United States.

Trump earlier unleashed U.S. air assets and Special Forces on the Islamic State and – with the indispensable assistance of the scorched-earth practices of Putin and Assad – took back all of the territory IS controlled. With that success, all U.S. military personnel should have been immediately brought home from Syria and Iraq. The Islamic State organization is far from dead but it has no Caliphate, it has suffered high casualties, and it is dispersed across the region. Its future is now in the hands of Syria, Russia, Iraq, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the other Gulf tyrannies, and Iran. At some point, all of those countries will again have to fight a regrouped IS. We will see how they fare, perhaps wish them well, but the morass they are falling into is now all theirs. America has come to its senses and its soldier-children are coming home. About time.

Trump also has correctly noted that if the Europeans have any worries about America’s departure from a war in which it has no genuine interest – the Europeans, like Democrats, will not recognize commonsense at work — they ought to join together and ride to the rescue of one or another of the war’s remaining participants.  And, of course, if the war in the region is really about democracy, the only democracy in the Middle East doubtless will be eager ride into the death-promising Muslim quagmire with the European interventionists.

Finally, the Kurds are not America’s friends or allies; they are, at most, our paid killers, people whom we have trained and armed to a higher level of military capability and lethality. After we leave, they will not hesitate to kill an American – military or civilian – if one gets in the way of what they intend to do. Recent Kurdish history amounts to a long and exceedingly lethal terrorist campaign against Turkey inside Turkey, so if Ankara’s military brutally kicks hell out of the Kurds, and then just as brutally drives them much farther away from Turkey’s borders, it will simply be, once again, another proof of the adage that what goes around comes around.

Overall, Mr. President, well done and keep it up. There are still many of our military people eager to come home from the useless wars caused by both the hubristic interventionism of Obama, Hillary Clinton, G.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, and the personal greed of each and the political parties and arms makers they represent.

When Pelosi, Schiff, the other semi-humans in the Democrat caucus, and the mainstream media initiated an impeachment investigation of President Trump, Americans heard, for the first time in the republic’s history, a declaration of civil war that would genuinely threaten the citizenry’s freedoms and liberties. When President Jefferson Davis ordered Confederate batteries to fire on Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor, he and his cabinet colleagues did indeed start a civil war. Davis’s action, however, did not in any way constitute an attack on the liberties of northern citizens. That said, a civil war is the sort of conflict whose outcome and consequences can never be foretold. It therefore was perceived by some at the time as just such an existential threat.

To repeat, there is no evidence that Davis and his colleagues wanted to enslave northerners. Their intent was to leave and thereby break the Union and establish a second slave-holding republic in North America. This goal was a threat to the Union’s survival – so it had to defeated – but the Confederates were no threat to liberty in the North. The always wildcard nature of civil war, though, did initiate – during and especially after Lincoln’s death – the slow but steady consolidation of wartime policies into the now Democrat-backed policy of completing the national government’s transformation into an elites-run, dictatorial regime that is beyond the control of the electorate.

So now Americans are facing, thanks to the Democrats, the first genuine life-and-death threat to their liberties; Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and the USSR never posed such a domestic threat, only the deeds of G.W. Bush and, especially, Woodrow Wilson and Barack Obama came close.

There is – if it is possible – less substance on the issue of President Trump’s conversation with Ukraine’s president, then there was on the Democrat-fabricated Russia lies. The Democrats clearly hate Trump, but is even clearer that they hate Americans and their republic more. They intend to seize all guns from Americans to make resistance to tyranny impossible; control all healthcare, so the unborn, born, and elderly can be murdered at their discretion; reimpose Obama’s exorbitant taxes on all Americans; further fill the country with illegal, criminal, diseased, and unwanted foreigners and ensure they vote Democrat; eliminate the ability of working-class Americans to save anything by taxing them to the bone for their totalitarian, enormously farcical, and utterly anti-scientific global-warming charade; and subordinate America to China’s communist regime, the anti-human UN, and the authoritarian EU.

Unlike the Confederate leaders, the Democrat leaders’ plan is not to split the Union but to create a death-dealing, continent-wide internment camp for U.S. citizens, just as their Chinese idols and pay-masters have done for their Muslim population in Xinjiang. Once confined, the Democrats will offer Americans the chance to choose between death and pledging obedience to the Democrats’ neo-fascist, globalist agenda. In the end, however, they intend to kill all incarcerated Americans, and they will laugh especially hard as they kill those who thought they saved themselves by renouncing liberty and pledging fealty to the globalists.

America’s first civil war, for the most part, was fought by able, honorable, and patriotic republican politicians on both sides, men who had spent several decades working together, often with acrimony, to avoid war. Their efforts finally failed, and 625,000 Americans died in bloody struggle in which neither side had a monopoly on virtue before, during, or after the war . The North prevailed, but it and the South owe unending respect and thanks to one of the greatest Americans, General Robert E. Lee. As Marse Robert surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia to the temperate, nay generous terms offered by General Grant, he also firmly and definitively forbid the plans of several of his general officers to disperse the army into the mountains and countryside to begin waging a guerrilla war against the North. Lee’s commonsense and personal courage in facing down his officers on this score ended bloodshed and protected liberty in the republic until the Democratic Party formed the Ku Klux Klan and began the guerrilla war Lee had stopped in its tracks.

At this point in his first term, President Trump has only begun to resuscitate a dying economy, a despairing, overtaxed, censored, and over-regulated citizenry, and a preference for peace that was abandoned by the governing elite. By his example and successes, Mr. Trump also has so far prevented the smoldering hatred of Americans for the national government; federal, state, and local bureaucrats, and the teachers who educate their children to revel in the glories of sexual deviancy, libertinism, atheism, socialism, and anti-Americanism from blazing into civil war.

America, then, stands on the edge of a Democrat-made civil war, and the Ukraine lie has the potential to push the republic over the brink into conflict. The Democrats so far have been protected from the eradication they richly deserve by two things. First, by Trump’s tangible economic successes and consistent willingness to work with the Democrats on issues vital to the citizenry, jobs, infrastructure, health care, trade, border control, etc. His supporters have stood back and watched to see if he could wring positive cooperation from the republic’s Democratic tormentors. Second, by the simple, accurate economic determination of thrifty and patriotic Americans that there is not a single Democratic leader whose life is worth the cost of a 9mm cartridge.

If a time comes when the Democrats seem about to wreck Trump, his presidency, and so the republic, however, the traditional concern of American patriots for thrift and cost effectiveness in their expenditures surely will be tossed out the window. The Democrats then will reap the much-merited slaughter brought by whirlwind they stupidly created.

So now we have heard the Democrats’ eternally adolescent, presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke promise that, if elected, he will order the national government’s police and military forces to seize AR-15s and other incorrectly described “assault weapons” from law-abiding U.S. citizens. It is an odd and, perhaps, even a dangerous decision to tell Americans that you will strip them of inalienable rights as soon as you can, but there you are.

Some people, and even a few of the country’s semi-human Democrats, have criticized O’Rourke for his indifference to the legitimacy – and popularity — of the 2^nd Amendment. More people, and especially Democrats, have damned him for telling the truth and failing to disguise the “extremism” of his remarks, which all but doom the passing of any legislation that would begin the process of strangling the rights of gun-owning citizens without needing to raise the radioactive issue of formally amending the U.S. Constitution.

Two points here. There is no real disagreement with the plans of boy-wonder Beto among Democrats. They all agree with his plans to seize not only AR-15s, but all firearms from American citizens. This consensus has nothing to do with the Democrats compassion for the people and families that have suffered at the hands of the shooters. All of the Democrats’ faux outrage, theatrical tears, and choked-up voices are meant merely to hide their plans to seize all privately – and so constitutionally — held firearms.

After all, this is party whose most vociferous leaders and media champions have, since 1973, resolutely defended and celebrated the mass murder of 61 million innocent, unborn Americans (premeditated murder is wonderfully empowering for women, you know); who now demand that infants can be murdered after they are born; and who, if the party wins the presidency, will legalize the removal of functioning organs from the still-living unborn, or only mortally wounded, babies, and permit the sale of them to the highest bidder. To believe that any Democrat actually gives a tinker’s damn about those few who have been killed by nut-job and often pro-Democrat mass shooters is a transparently false claim for most Americans – unless they count themselves among those certifiably deranged individuals who are the only people (?) permitted to be members of the Democratic Party.

The second point to understand about Beto and all other Democrats, is that the mob of them are, in some ways, not nearly as dumb as they look and sound. (They have no ability to govern a republic, but would be splendid tyrants and top-notch Stalinist gulag managers.) At least among Beto and the party’s other so-called leaders, their advisers, and their innumerable, dishonest media shills, there is a full understanding of the Founders intent for including the 2^nd Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. Ol’ Beto and his unhinged, spendthrift, communist, and/or deviant colleagues know that the Founders wanted to ensure that Americans, through the length of the republic’s existence and with a quality of arms appropriate to the era and task, could defend themselves against, or rid themselves of, those who would abandon the U.S. Constitution and rule as tyrants, not as the Constitution-bound governors of a republican citizenry.

In frank terms, Beto, his fellow presidential candidates, other party leaders, most of its rank-and-file, and the media know that the 2^nd Amendment is aimed squarely at their ongoing effort to destroy the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Christian tradition that informs both. They know that the Founders’ too-often unspoken, but understood by all, intention was to afford Americans in all eras to possess the tools with which to kill those who declare that they will deny citizens the rights that belong to them as birthrights and as they are cited in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and, ultimately, by the design of their Creator. Today the 2nd Amendment also is aimed at those who have committed treason, with foreign help, by trying to overthrow a legitimately elected government. Beto and his party already have tried and failed to do the latter, and now he and his party have designated the destruction of the 2^nd Amendment – and thus the Constitution – as the governing mission of the next Democratic president and his team of gauleiters and commissars, probably led by Reichsführer Eric Holder.

In the early morning of 19 April 1775, Captain John Parker aligned his militia company on Lexington Green to face an approaching British military column. The latter had been assigned by the king’s commander-in-chief in the colonies, Major-General Thomas Gage, to disarm the population around Boston and to seize or destroy any arms, gunpowder, and ammunition the colonists had stored in makeshift arsenals. Both Parker and his men knew precisely what the British were after, and as he formed the unit on the Green, Parker is reported to have said “Stand your ground. Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.” The British tried and failed to disarm those they called “damn rebels”, and then their units were nearly bleed white as that rabble attacked them all along the route of their forced and hurried retreat toward Boston.

Like the British, Little Boy Beto has “fired” for himself and his party on all law-abiding Americans and their families. Well, the citizenry still holds the authority of the 2^nd Amendment and their Creator, as well as their era-appropriate firearms. So, to Beto and his crew of lawless and deviant sidekicks, the only possible response, as they seem to have a death wish, is the Greek phrase Molon labe – come and take them.

Last weekend’s attack on the Saudi Aramco facility is an odd duck when it comes to events of this kind. There are several basic questions that have yet to be answered.

–1.) What has the attack have to do with the United States? No Americans or American property were lost, or even injured. It seems, based on media reporting, that Saudi Arabia was attacked by Iran, though the White House and the Pentagon have not confirmed that this media reporting is correct. Again, whether it was Iran, another country, or a terrorist group, the attack was not an attack, let alone an act of war, against the United States. At this point in time, the correct action for the United States to take is none. That may change, but right now the republic has no genuine national security interest at risk, thanks in large measure to the Trump administration and the energy  independence it promoted and helped to secured.

–2.) Each branch of U.S. military has a widespread presence in Saudi Arabia, the Arabian Peninsula’s other Arab tyrannies, as well as afloat in the Persian Gulf and the northwest Indian Ocean. Surely, parts of all of these forces – as well as multiple U.S. military satellites — are bore-sighted on Iranian military activity and the threat it poses to the Arab Peninsula, as well as the U.S. personnel and interests based there. How is it, then, that U.S. (or Saudi) land-based, sea-based, and space-based early warning radars and other detection systems completely missed what media have described as a small-cloud of drones and cruise missiles at any point along the trail from their deployment and preparation, to their launch and flight, to their impact? Are Iranian weapon systems so much more sophisticated than the U.S. military’s attack-detection technology and anti-missile/anti-aircraft weaponry that the Iranian missiles and drones were never seen and not a shot was gotten off against them? Or did someone order a very blind eye be turned toward Iran for a few hours?

–3. Is it really plausible to believe that the purported Iranian attack on Saudi Arabia just happened to occur on the eve of Israel’s national election, a contest in which war-hawk and Iran-hater Netanyahu and his party were on the political ropes. Is it really a stretch to believe that an offensive Iranian air-attack on Saudi Arabia on the eve of the election would cause some of the Israeli voters who were intending not to vote for Netanyahu and the Likud Party, to be moved by the Iranian attack to think again and then snug back up to the anti-Iran crusader Netanyahu? Coincidences are rare in the lives of individuals and nations, and this a coincidence of such enormous proportions that it is quite hard to believe.

Let me conclude by saying that I do not know if Iran attacked the Saudis’ oil facility or not. But what I do know, at this point, is (a) that the United States government has no reason to attack Iran whether or not it attacked Aramco; that is the Saudis job is they choose to do it; (b) that it is more important to find out why the U.S. military seems to have absolutely failed in its early warning mission on the Arab Peninsula and the seas around it, and if such an utter failure also is likely to occur here in the United States; and (c) that Israel always is out only for itself, and that it and its U.S. citizen allies (paid agents?) will cooperate to do whatever it is they decide is required to service Israel’s and Netanyahu’s interests, even if it means pushing the United States into an unnecessary war.

Mr. President: For those of your supporters who genuinely believe in the non-interventionist segment of an America First policy, there could be no better news than your sacking of John Bolton. He and his like – Crystal, Boot, Romney, and the rest of the Neocons and disloyal Israel-Firsters – are hip-deep in the blood and limbs of U.S. military personnel who became casualties in multiple unnecessary wars, none of which had anything to do with protecting American liberties and freedom. Indeed, the presidents who orchestrated and prolonged the wars constricted both, and also waged war against the Bill of Rights. On booting Bolton, Mr. President, well done.

Now for Afghanistan. Sir, for a guy like me, from Buffalo, New York, it is an odd but true fact that I have spent most of the past four decades working, from one angle or another, on wars in Afghanistan. I cannot say that I loved this work all the time – the best of times were when we helped drive the Red Army out of Afghanistan – but it has been pretty consistently fascinating. Moreover, it is the easiest to understand and solve foreign-policy problem that has ever confronted the United States.

Mr. President you must accept that, on the Afghan issue, you are surrounded by civilian advisors who are morons, liars, money-grubbers, mineral-chasers, war-lovers, and democracy crusaders, as well as generals who cannot tell the difference between winning and losing. The latter, I suppose, is to be expected as no U.S. general has participated in a winning war since September, 1945. Fortunately, none of the unnecessary wars they have lost even remotely put American freedom or liberty at risk, except from domestic enemies. Taking advice from any of this lot, is like taking advice on particle physics from Ilhan Omar.

Now, Sir, when you were elected you were presented with a lost war. Obama, Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld had presided over – and even directed — numerous half-ass military campaigns that were shrugged off by the Afghan Taleban and its allies, no matter what their casualties. The Afghan leaders knew that the U.S. military was not there to win. They do have ears, you know, and they heard all U.S. generals publicly proclaim, ad nauseam, something like “There is no military solution to the Afghan conflict.” These be-starred knuckleheads might as well have said publicly that the Taleban had won, game, set, and match.

The Taleban’s leaders also knew the U.S. did not intend to win in Afghanistan because they had watched Bill Clinton refuse to even attempt one of the ten chances CIA gave him to kill or capture Osama bin Laden. Always recall, Mr. President, there would have been no Afghan War or Iraq War if Clinton had removed bin Laden from the scene in 1998 or 1999.

You are fighting, Mr. President, an enemy in the Taleban, as well as the other Islamist Afghan insurgent groups, a foe that is far tougher, much more patient, more zero-sum minded, stupendously less casualty-adverse, and more religiously devout than any of your advisors, civil or military. The current crop of Afghan Islamist insurgents and their predecessors, taken together, have chalked up nearly 40 continuous years on the battlefield since the Soviet invasion occurred in December 1979. The score after four decades shows the Afghans have knocked off two superpowers – the USSR and the hodge-podge of U.S.-NATO forces. This, after having knocked off the British superpower in the 19^th century. Can you, Sir, name another country that has defeated three superpowers?

What you need to know about Afghanistan, namely, the determinative role its history plays in the Afghans’ thinking and actions, and what that means for the United States, is limited, easy to understand, and is encompassed in the three points that follow. They were clear, true, and utterly reliable long  before the CIA deployed to country in the fall 2001 to wait for the eventual arrival of the U.S. military. Though I tend to believe it is true about most countries, Afghanistan is truly the land where the outcome of all events in which foreigners are involved are readily predictable – that is, history repeats itself, Afghans win, foreigners lose — and there are none of the “unintended consequences” that the Bush and Obama teams that gave you this lost war loved to prate about. And so, the points:

–-First, the Afghans will wage war against any Afghan or foreigner who tries to install and maintain a strong and effective central government in Kabul. This thoroughly tribalized country is preeminently one of regions and peace is maintained by letting those regions look inward and rule themselves. An Afghan central government is durable as long as it is quiescent and content ruling Kabul. Our attempt to build a strong central government was and is promoting armed resistance to it. This was known, and ignored, by those who sent the U.S. military there to create a central government that would govern all of Afghanistan.

–Second, the Afghans – meaning many more people than just Taleban members and other militant Afghan Islamists – do not like foreigners. While they deal politely with foreigners who are visiting the country, especially if they have money to spend or are bringing financial aid, the Afghans, historically, have zero tolerance for foreigners who invade and occupy their country. Alexander the Great and his army, the military might and resolve of the 19^th century British Empire, the modern and merciless Soviet Red Army, and now the rudderless activities – is it war-fighting, democracy building, or feminism? – of the U.S.-NATO force all have been greeted by a non-ending defensive war fought by the Afghans with religious zeal and the single-minded goal of evicting the foreign invaders. The Afghans endured and eventually succeeded in forcing foreigners to evacuate on all previous occasions, and, in those cases, they did so against enemies who were far more ruthless and bloody minded than the current effeminate and diddling occupiers.

–Third, there is no point worrying about what will happen to the Afghans who worked for the U.S.-NATO civil and military organizations, nor about those Afghans who have filled government posts during the occupation. Most of them already have stuffed their pockets with stolen U.S. taxpayer money and will leave the country to save their lives. Those who cannot leave probably will be killed, as an Afghan who supports foreigners against Afghan Muslims is not only defined as traitor, but also as a heretic for helping non-Muslim foreigners to kill Afghan Muslims. The truth about the recent breakdown of “peace talks” with the Taleban is that they were a hoax from start to finish. The Taleban eventually would have made some kind of deal if the U.S. agreed to completely withdraw. If that occurred, they would have abided by its provisions until the last U.S. Marine left the country, and then would have turned mercilessly on those who supported the occupation or fought alongside the foreign occupiers. If your advisers had been worth their salt, they would have told you that the peace talks were a charade that, at best, would have let U.S. civilian and military personnel depart Afghanistan in a manner somewhat more dignified than the manner in which they fled Hanoi (It was Saigon, of course. Like my Dad said “too soon old, too late smart).

Move on Afghanistan quickly, Mr. President, the entire country – except for generals, gun-makers, and disloyal U.S. citizens – will warmly welcome fulfillment of part of the campaign promise in which you pledged to bring our soldier-children home. Then, Iraq next.

And one final point, Sir. I have suggested previously in this space that you might benefit from reviewing the history of General George Marshall’s forced retirement of many dozens of U.S. general officers just before the start of World War II. He knew many of these officers, and knew they were not up to the challenge posed by what appeared to be an approaching world war. Mr. President, the ranks of your general officers are filled with losers; indeed, you have no serving general officer who has ever been on a winning side in a war. But you are also blessed with even more junior officers who have substantial combat experience and who, almost certainly, are disgusted by generals who have no intention of winning the wars into which they send men and women to die or be maimed. Perhaps General Marshall’s action deserves a second performance, soon.

Having lived a life that has featured about as many failures as successes, I have come to believe that coincidences are few, and success and failure are largely of your own making. This is not to say that there are no coincidences, but most seem to be in the mundane category, such as befriending a person who has the same birthday as you, or deciding to pick up the phone to call someone just as the person you intended to call rings your number. In the bigger, more important affairs in the life of a person or the nation, however, coincidences are pretty rare. Those in positions of power and influence who commonly claim that important events are only coincidences must be doubted and held suspect.

With this point made, I was wondering how many people could possibly believe that the following juxtaposition of events are examples of common coincidences?

—Hong Kong: Do the Chinese merit the media’s 24-hour hour damnation for opposing the Hong Kong demonstrations, while, at the same time, Macron’s thug-like treatment of France’s “Yellow Vest” protesters are ignored by the media. For 18 weeks, FOX said last Friday, the Chinese demonstrators have marched for “freedom” and suffered at the hands of the “brutal” Hong Kong government and their Chinese masters. But what about France? Well, neither FOX nor any other major U.S. media organization that I am aware of has fully covered the 43 weeks of Yellow Vest protests against Macron’s globalist and climate-change-crazed government. The brutality of the French treatment of the Yellow Vests has only been followed and documented by Russian Television (RT). Is this a coincidence? The answer is no. Why does this matter?

—First, because the deliberately incendiary media coverage of Hong Kong events has given the Neocons and their mainstream and cable media allies another chance to seek war, this time with China.

—Second, because the fate of Hong Kong’s population was decided in 1997 when the British government consigned it to the horrors of eventual rule by the Chinese communists. President Clinton’s administration and most other of the so-called “western democracies” supported the UK’s decision to “hand over” Hong Kong to the Beijing butchers. Neither the British nor Clinton nor any of the other Western leaders who supported the handover had any plausible reason to believe the Chinese regime would honor the 50-year period before full Chinese control became effective. It is too bad for people in Hong Kong, but their future was decided for them by the UK, the U.S., and the West, all of whom knew that their future would be reeducation camps, executions by the tens of thousands, and ultimately service as the obedient automatons of the Chinese communists. The real enslavers of Hong Kong’s residents reside in London, Washington, Paris, and elsewhere in the West. Any Western attempt to rescue Hong Kong’s population would be madly Quixotic, potentially war-causing, and utterly insincere, as Britain and the West long ago consigned the city and its people to Chinese savagery and a communist hell.

Third, and most important, the taxpayers of the United States are on the hook to pay for – and potentially see their kids die for – the defense of Europe. Why? Because U.S. elitists want to be able to identify the republic as the “leader of the Free World” and trumpet the greatness of Western democracies. Well, French police are regularly beating the Yellow Vesters, and RT has film of the French police picking random targets and then striking them from behind with a kind of club. (1) Now, as far as I am concerned, these French-vs-French battles are neither here nor there. They are internal governing matters for the French to decide for themselves. The issue at hand is that NATO is no longer “a defender of democracy” nor of the rule of law or equality before the law. Indeed, NATO member governments currently are the crucifier of what once were called “Western values”. Macron’s police beat demonstrating citizens: British politicians refuse to execute the electorate’s majority decision to leave the EU; German and Scandinavian leaders construe their countries’ laws to allow Muslim males to rape women and molest children without penalty; and Italian globalists and the EU cooperate to overthrow Salvini’s legitimate nationalist regime and restart the admission of unwanted, criminal, and diseased migrants. In addition, nearly all of the NATO governments are engaged, individually or through the EU, in restricting free speech, attacking Christianity, limiting the right to assembly, and generally making destabilizing migrant groups legally privileged and entitled to priority over native citizens for housing, employment, and public assistance. It is time for the U.S. government to recognize that democracy in Europe exists in name only, that the substance of it is long gone, and that there is no credible reason for the republic to remain in NATO, waste more money, and risk automatic war in the name of defending European democracies that are now rotting corpses.

—Shootings: Can anyone with a bit of commonsense really believe that the series of shootings during and now, with Odessa, on the eve of the House and Senate coming back into session after a luxurious 5-week paid vacation are just run-of-the-mill coincidences? Once again in Odessa, the shooter called the FBI and local authorities before he attacked, and, as in most cases since 2017, little or nothing was done to preempt the attacks. How can it possibly be that the FBI and/or the local police do not act on information that is given to them and for which they did not even have to break a sweat to ferret out? From the pro-Democrat, Saudi princeling’s Las Vegas ambush of concert-goers to the attack in Odessa, warnings were ignored, and dead, wounded, and traumatized resulted.

–None of this can be attributed to guns, let alone the 2^nd Amendment. It has to do with three things: (a) No one benefits from these killings except the Democratic Party, and it benefits greatly. Seizing guns from Americans is a central part of the party’s platform, and its sad-excuse for leaders use every shooting – except if it occurs in Chicago, where 8 were shot dead last weekend — to fuel their goal of disarming Americans; (b) Mental illness is the dominant characteristic of the Democratic Party and those who vote for it, just listen to their presidential candidates, view the newspapers and media outlets that are arms of the party; and look and listen to the apparently barely human creatures who are in Antifa. A quick review of these things offer a clear photo of where madness resides, thrives, and is propagated in America; (c) Democrats control the educational system from pre-K through Ph.D. levels. They teach kids about a world that has not, does not, and will never exist. They thusly produce graduates who enter a world in which nothing is familiar to them, and so are disoriented, frightened, unable to make a decent living, and useless to themselves and the republic. All of these threats to Americans can be neutered if the Democratic Party is eradicated, and perhaps there is a slim chance that might be done the polls.

–Climate: Is it possible that the best meteorological minds in the world have not been able to tell what a hurricane is going to do, even though it is a single weather event, there is no obstacle to knowing where it is, and there are multiple nations steadily flying civil and military planes and sophisticated instruments into the storm? Apparently so, and for more than a week these experts consistently have been forced to reassess and change their predictions because they simply did not know what the storm is going to do. To their unending credit, these fine meteorological minds never tired of reminding viewers that they were doing the best they could with weather models that, while plentiful, were seldom unanimous in laying out what to expect from hurricanes.

–Now, these hard-working experts, faced with a clear, tangible, dangerous, and immediate weather event, and armed with cutting-edge technology and models, had to carefully explain that they are partly guessing and mostly depending on the history of what hurricanes have done for several centuries in the Atlantic. Is it merely a coincidence that the host of well-educated, climate-change wankers can be so cock sure they can tell precisely what will happen to the earth’s climate 20, 30, or 40 years in the future, especially because the data they pick to use – more likely invent – is such a small part of the many centuries of data available to study? No coincidence here, the truth is that Climateers cannot forecast with even minimal precision. The words, studies, and screeching, chicken-little warnings of the Climate Changers — scientists and their equally deceitful media propagandists alike — are replete with deliberate lies; laughably false statistics; melting glaciers that not only stubbornly fail to melt but are growing; inundated cities that still stand high and dry a decade or two after the  climate scientists had designated their certain submersion dates (2); and action plans that would do nothing but make Americans the tax-slaves of Democrats, globalists, and the lying climate scientists and media commentators who are on their payroll.

Each time I hear any Democrat leader, Democratic loyalist, Democrat media shill, or Mitt Romney speak, I think that no men ever have been so astoundingly prescient as were America’s Founders. Those men left the 2^nd Amendment as part of their legacy and that action assures contemporary Americans have in their own hands a reliable capability to ensure that their republic and liberties will endure for themselves, their children, and future generations. How hopeless things would be for Americans if we were – like Britons, Frenchmen, and Italians – unarmed, and so utterly unable to defend our homeland, kith, and kin from globalists tyrants and their gangster, communist, and pedophile followers.

–Endnotes:

–1.) The compelling video coverage of the random violence that Macron’s police have applied against the Yellow Vesters can be seen – for now — by searching YouTube for “RT” and “Yellow Vests”.

–2.) I have found the YouTube videos by a man named “Tony Heller” to be extraordinary in their clear, concise, and irrefutable presentation of evidence showing how the quack Climate-Change scientists fabricate, distort, or simply hide/delete scientific data that would destroy their arguments and reveal them as grubby, do-anything-for-money schills who happen to be in the leading rank – with most Western governments — of the world’s greediest hucksters and most destructive liars.

The combination of the freakish Cory Booker’s call for a federal agency to fight White Nationalism, and the NY Times Magazine’s call for recasting U.S. history to focus exclusively on slavery and “American racism”, are the final straws. Enough is enough, and the Democratic Party’s relentless efforts to destroy the republic will, when the time is right, cost it everything.

For now, facts will suffice to refute and warn Booker, the NY Times, and all Democrats:

–The most important founders and expanders of Black slavery in the Western Hemisphere were Black African tribal leaders. No Black slave hunters in Africa, no Black slaves in the Western hemisphere. The story of the process of securing the raw human material needed to install slavery in the Western Hemisphere would not have been accomplished without the work and avarice of those Black-African slave hunters, herders, and sellers.

–The next most important founder was the British Crown, which could only turn their sugar crops in Britain’s southern North American and Caribbean colonies into gold with the importation of the Black slaves who were captured and sold by Black Africans to slave traders who then transported them to the New World to be resold at higher prices.

–The most lethal lie imaginable is that slaves were wholeheartedly welcomed into British North America. Many Americans – including many of the Founders — opposed Black slavery from 1619 forward, tried to end it at the time of the Declaration of Independence, when writing the Constitution, and then again, very vigorously, from 1787 until 1861. Most of the Americans who opposed slavery knew that the republic could not have been founded or nurtured to maturity if priority had been given to abolition or emancipation. Any attempt to do so would have driven the southern states out of the young Union, and rightly so because slavery was protected by the Constitution. The decision to keep fighting for abolition – John Quincy Adams died on the floor of the Congress demanding it — and not try to end slavery by force was the right one. The Union’s survival is always the republic’s top priority.

–From the Constitution’s ratification until Appomattox in1865, slavery was maintained in the United States by the Constitution, but was entrenched more deeply into society by the Democratic Party’s passionate allegiance to Black enslavement, its maintenance, and its geographical expansion across the continent. Such Democratic paragons as Jefferson, Madison, Andrew Jackson, Stephen A. Douglas, John C. Calhoun, Jefferson Davis, Alexander Stephens, Roger B. Tawney, and many other party leaders and their journalistic acolytes ensured that slavery was not even put on the road to its end. Indeed, in the half-century before the Civil War, Democratic leaders turned their pro-slavery justification from claiming that slavery was a “regrettable but necessary evil” to the declaring and preaching that slavery was “positive good” for Blacks. This, of course, has been the Democratic position ever since.

–When the Civil War came, it was fought to preserve the Union and ended with the Union intact, slavery abolished. By 1870, Black freeman were protected by a blanket of strong amendments to the Bill of Rights. It’s worth noting, that 625,000 men — all Americans — died to decide whether the pro-slavery Confederacy would survive. The Union’s armies prevailed and, as a result, emancipation had its best chance to succeed since America was founded.

–But this his pro-freedom moment for Black Americans ended almost before it began. After Lincoln’s death, the Democrats re-established their sway in southern state governments and ignored or side-stepped the Civil War amendments. For all intents and purposes, the state Democratic regimes reestablished Black slavery under different names and processes, including segregation laws, sharecropping, Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, separate-but equal policies, etc.  To enforce this new and highly effective variety of slavery the South’s Democratic State governments help to build anti-black sentiment and police forces at the local, county, and state levels. The Democrats also created their own private paramilitary force — known as the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) — to terrify, beat, burn, lynch, shoot, and kill Blacks as directed by Democratic political leaders. It is worth noting here, that one of Hillary Clinton’s political heroes and prized mentors was a former KKK Grand Wizard.

–From 1865 until 1963, Democratic politicians in the federal, state, county and local governments, as well as in the U.S. Supreme Court, did all they could to keep Blacks enslaved in this sturdy de facto manner. During Democratic President Woodrow Wilson’s two terms (1913-1919), the deeply racist Georgian and his colleagues undid most of modest advances Blacks had achieved under presidents Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft in terms of gaining employment in the national government. From the end of Wilson’s terms in 1919 until the presidency of Lyndon Johnson, Democratic politicians at all levels of government fought a tooth-and-nail rearguard action fight againts the civil-rights movement and maintain the de facto slavery of America’s Black citizens. Democratic President Johnson came to the rescue and revived the spirit of these Democratic dead-enders. After starting his Great Society program and savagely pushing his party to support passage of the1964 Voting Rights Act, Johnson reportedly said “I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years.” [1]

Well, like Hitler’s judgment of the Third Reich’s longevity, Johnson’s prediction of how long his party would control those he called “niggers” was an exaggeration. After Ronald Reagan restored to the minds of all Americans the eternal truth that the government always is their potential enemy, the Democrats’ hold on those they saw as Black slaves began to ever so slowly crumble. Both Bushes, both Clinton’s, and — by his own words – ol’ foreign-born Hussein hung on as long as they could and kept Blacks shackled on the plantation that the Democrats and Black con-men like Jackson and Sharpton had created for them. But change was in the air, and it finally was voiced by Donald D. Trump.

Who could have imagined that a simple six-word question — “What have you got to lose?” — would begin to dull the razor-wire surrounding the Democratic Party’s slave plantation and permit a steady flow of escapees. Though far from being wise, the power-desperate Democratic leaders and their rank-and-file knew how quickly their long-held power over Blacks would slip away once those Blacks realized how their allegiance to the party was taken for granted, as well as how despised they were by Democrats, who laughed at what they saw as their gullible, childlike belief that the party meant to aid them, rather than simply keeping them impoverished and raping them for their votes. Trump, at a minimum, put an idea that long merited being spoken into the minds of millions of Democrat-abused-for-centuries Black American citizens, and now departures from the plantation are increasing.

Faced with this reality, the Democrats again have turned to the only tool that has ever kept them in political power; namely, slavery. Democratic leaders, of course, cannot use the word “slavery” to describe the goal of their policies, but that reality is clear enough. The Democrats simply use the term “human trafficking”, which has nowhere the sting and attention-focusing potential as the more precisely accurate term “slave trade.” (2)

The purpose of the Democratic Party’s militant lust for maintaining open borders is to facilitate a re-accretion of enduring and dominating political power by replacing its now awakening Black slaves, with illegal, criminal, diseased, and anti-American migrants who will restock the plantation and reliably vote — after being payed subsidies from the U.S. Treasury — for the Democratic Party and, so, their continued enslavement.

Indeed, the Democrats have artfully recreated the 17th century-origins of slavery in America. Just as Black Africans seized other Black Africans and profitably sold them into slavery, the Democrats are now exploiting the willingness of Latin Americans to criminally move or sell many millions of other Latin Americans into slavery, all under the auspices of the Democratic Party. Some of these illegals are being allocated to the poverty-stricken plantation to serve as voters. Others are used as money-making assets like narcotics mules, criminals, female and male prostitutes, or — in honor of Democratic Party saint, Jeffrey Epstein — children to be used to sate the perversions of either the party’s abundant company of pedophiles, or its senior members who are said to find a religious sort of ecstasy in the ritual murder – and even consumption — of the infants and children they purchase from the party’s Hispanic slave-trading associates.

The foregoing surely is one of the most tragic stories in American history, but it must be told because it is irrefutably true. It really ought to be told in much greater detail, and certainly with more expertise than I possess. But there is no amount of pulling down Civil War statues, heaping abuse on the American South and its people, painting over murals of General Washington, or, per the NY Times Magazine, writing new race-based versions of the country’s history that can disguise the Democrat’s enormous crimes against the republic. The latter can never hide the three-centuries of bloody abomination inflicted on the nation by the Democrat Party and by their ideological, slave-driving ancestors. Democrats are simply at the very bottom of a disgustingly filthy barrel where the other torturers of mankind are found, convivial folks like Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and those powerful Black Africans and now Hispanics who sold their fellow Black and Hispanic men, women, and children into slavery, misery, and unspeakable abuse.

Without the Democrats, Black slavery and its poisonous repercussions within the American Union would have disappeared almost entirely in the years since 1865. Both remain at recognizable levels only because the Democrats have kept them alive, and in the last 30 years have reinvigorated them. As a consequence, they ultimately will have to pay for their crimes against the republic and its citizenry.

As a law-abiding citizen, I can honestly say that if the Democrats ever again take power and come calling on Americans to help pay for, say, open borders, reparations, amnesty or health insurance for illegal aliens, more quotas for schools and jobs, government-funded abortions, or unnecessary wars to spread democracy, I will pay. In fact, I will meet with them and pay my share with enthusiasm with what is now that most precious of metals, lead that can be formed into easily handled and stored containers.

–Endnotes:

–1.) https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/15769.Lyndon_B_Johnson?page=2

–2.) The identical nature of the “slave trade” and “human trafficking” was suggested to me by my sage and greatly valued friend, Colonel Mike.

When the UK government returned its Hong Kong colony to China on 1 July 1997, it did so with the full knowledge that they were turning the colony’s population over to a Chinese communist tyranny that had killed more innocent people than either Stalin or the American Medical Association. Beijing has never given up its prized status as leader in the field of annihilating the innocent, and, indeed, is perfecting its murderous skills against the Chinese Muslim population residing in the country’s western Xinjiang Province, a place now reported to be an enormous concentration camp.

The British gave up the colony because they could not afford its cost, because they feared China would use its military to annex the colony, because it was being shamed by the Western media as an anachronistic “colonial power”, and because they knew that the UK military had been cut to the bone after the fall of the USSR and so Britain’s only effective military response to a surprise Chinese annexation would be a decidedly counterproductive nuclear response.

The bottom line here is that British government leaders knew that once Hong Kong was awarded to the butchers of Beijing, there was nothing the UK could do to stop China if it reneged on its pledge to leave Hong Kong more or less alone for 50 years. Despite the protective-language that Britain’s political grandees used as they dumped the people of Hong King into China’s murderous maw, the Brits knew that their words were lies exactly the same as those they used to pledge to come to Poland’s aid in the late-summer of 1939. The truth is simply that Britain knew that it could not fulfill its 1939 pledge to help the Poles stop the Nazis from invading Poland and slaughtering Poles, and it knew that its implicit 1997 pledge of protection would not stop the Chinese communists from invading and occupying Hong Kong and thereafter tormenting its people in the name “reeducating” them.

Despite their comfort with betraying the people of Hong Kong in 1997, British leaders knew the UK would be savagely attacked by the media and world political leaders if China reneged on the 1997 deal and annexed Hong Kong — before the 50-year interim period expired –and Britain failed to try to save the Honk Kong population. British leaders knew, however, that the UK government still had a winning card to play. That card, of course, was and is the conceited and hubristic bipartisan American governing elite and its utter and unshakeable devotion to its ability to flatter itself by describing the United States and its president as “the leaders of the free world.” Think not? Recall how many tens of thousands of U.S. military personnel have been killed, wounded, and maimed since 1945 in unnecessary wars for no other reason than to allow these elitists to proudly bray that America would always – no matter the human and monetary costs — be the paladin of the free world.

Mr. Trump, this stage has been set for two-plus decades, and it now appears that the long-prepared tragedy is about to be performed on your watch. On this issue, Mr. President, America must come first. Your administration had nothing to do with stringing along the Hong Kong population as it walked toward catastrophe. Neither did your administration urge the genius leaders of the U.S. business community to create their offices, factories, and other investments in Hong Kong and mainland China.

If China moves into Hong Kong, Mr. President, let the cards fall where they may; that is, there must be no American money or blood expended to save a population the perfidious British consigned to the hell of the Chinese communists, and no U.S. cavalry to save the assets of U.S. companies who greedily sought riches overseas at the cost of kowtowing to and bribing the Beijing gangsters and exporting millions of America’s blue-collar jobs. Both made their own beds, let them now crawl on their bellies into them.

It seems fair, Mr. President, to use a few of Samuel Adams’s words to give some familial advice to those who are often referred to as our “British cousins”, as well as those American businessmen who have sold out middle-class Americans for foreign profits and communist masters. You should inform them, Sir, that no help will be coming their way from the republic to try to stop or reverse the course of events in Hong Kong. Tell them, Mr. President, that America comes first, and devils like them can take the hindmost.

On 1 August 1776,  Samuel Adams told the Congress in Philadelphia that,

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” (1)

Enough said.

Endnote:

–1.) http://www.foundingfatherquotes.com/quote/547

–“In our own native land, in defence of the freedom that is our birthright, and which we ever enjoyed till the late violation of it — for the protection of our property, acquired solely by the honest industry of our fore-fathers and ourselves, against violence actually offered, we have taken up arms. We shall lay them down when hostilities shall cease on the part of the aggressors, and all danger of their being renewed shall be removed, and not before.” John Dickinson and Thomas Jefferson, 6 July 1775 (1)

–“… the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (2)

–“Blessed be the Lord my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight …” (3)

I have previously written on this issue in this space. I do so again now because of the steady stream of cant coming from FOX News citing the need for immediate “unity” between the two parties, and the need for the both parties to cooperate in Congress and “work for the good of the American people” has gone on for far too long. Whatever the hopes of FOX News and its leaders, the truth should, once in a while, be inserted into the network’s broadcasts. In this case, the truth is that, as of this writing, there appears to be no possible ground for compromise between any Democrat and middle-class and blue-collar citizens.

—Why? A half-century of Democratic programs and wars – often supported by part of the Republican party and much of the media. From the clear unconstitutionality of hate-speech laws, Obama’s numerous unconstitutional diktats, and all wars that are entered into without a formal declaration of war by Congress, to the priority that now is given to awarding college admission on the basis of race, gender, geographical location, and – unbelievably – sexual deviance, the illegality and lack of fairness in the land is stunning and is most damaging to middle-class and blue-collar families because they do not have the money to fight those who have, through legislation, bribery, and a supine Supreme Court, integrated so much discrimination into the Constitution. Those on the short end of this stick see no point in cooperating with their tormentors because their pledges always are worthless, and because they are protected by their own vast wealth, the governments and courts they own, and their advertisement of their lethal capabilities and intent via the never-investigated and growing trail of corpses — which today includes their child procurer Jeffrey Epstein — that leads back to the gunmen employed and directed by the Clinton/Obama-built deep state

—Why? Because the above-noted people teach our children that whales and moles must be saved and then protected, but inform them that the murder of 61-plus million babies – even after they are born – is a just right to kill, as well as a sign of female equality, empowerment, and positive achievements. Because they teach our kids the crap pseudo-science that supports an insane belief in man-caused climate change, which is at least as much about instilling in kids an expectation and eagerness for the creation of an authoritarian world government that controls every aspect of their lives. Because they teach children to believe that our Founders were nothing but misogynists, slave-drivers, and white supremacists who created a worthless republic, whose founding documents and physical symbols must be destroyed, and whose population must be diluted by illiterate, diseased, and very often criminal illegal aliens who will reliably vote in rigged-elections for authoritarians and receive more of America’s wealth than do needy U.S. citizens. That wasted wealth will come from the taxes of middle-class and blue-collar families whose jobs also will be taken by illegals. Those on the short end of this stick see no point in cooperating with their tormentors because their pledges always are worthless, and because they are protected by their own vast wealth, the governments and courts they own, and their advertisement of their lethal capabilities and intent via the never-investigated and growing trail of corpses — which today includes their child procurer Jeffrey Epstein — that leads back to the gunmen employed and directed by the Clinton/Obama-built deep state

Why? Because of the war the Democrats and their allies are waging on the Bill of Rights and Christianity. The tide of censorship that is now occurring is driven by the Democrats, their Tech-giant and media cronies, and their unconstitutional hate-speech laws, and it is gutting the 1^st Amendment. Because the Democrats and some Republicans know depth of their own corruption, paid cooperation with China, and sexual crimes, they press ever harder to destroy the 2^nd Amendment, the only real failure of which lies in the fact that it has yet to be used for its ultimate purpose, which is to allow loyal-to-the-republic citizens to use their own arms to kill those who – like so much of the current governing class — brazenly seek to overthrow the U.S. Constitution, destroy the republican form of government it mandates; deal traitorously but for great personal profit with China; and, believing themselves superior people, by seeking to reduce the citizenry to a mass of enslaved and obediently servile yes-men. Those on the short end of this stick see no point in cooperating with their tormentors because their pledges always are worthless, and because they are protected by their own vast wealth, the governments and courts they own, and their advertisement of their lethal capabilities and intent via the never-investigated and growing trail of corpses — which today includes their child procurer Jeffrey Epstein — that leads back to the gunmen employed and directed by the Clinton/Obama-built deep state

—Why? Because, the Democrats and some Republicans have knowingly wasted the wealth and children of middle-class and blue-collar families via their endless and unnecessary interventionist wars; by their spendthrift giveaways, in cash, armaments, or protective military services, to tyrant-ruled and enormously wealthy countries; by building all kinds of modern infrastructure projects in foreign countries while America’s own has rotted; and by pouring unknown billions of tax dollars into post-Cold War NATO Alliance, even as the other 27 members of the Alliance cut their defense spending to the bone. Those on the short end of this stick see no point in cooperating with their tormentors because their pledges always are worthless, and because they are protected by their own vast wealth, the governments and courts they own, and their advertisement of their lethal capabilities and intent via the never-investigated and growing trail of corpses — which today includes their child procurer Jeffrey Epstein — that leads back to the gunmen employed and directed by the Clinton/Obama-built deep state

—Why? Because, most recently, 22 Democratic presidential candidates have pledged to continue and increase the tax-rape of middle-class and blue-collar families and use the funds to pay for health care for illegal aliens; to end border controls and allow in every bound-for-the-dole Third Worlder; to fund more programs to slay the non-existent, on-the-take-scientists’-created climate crisis, which is meant to install authoritarianism; to make sexual deviants an even more privileged class under the law and then proceed to legalize pedophilia; to prevent life-saving medical aid for babies born of botched abortions; to deny due process to gun owners and try to seize their weapons; to continue to attack and damn the Christian faith of judicial nominees and other candidates for national-government posts; and to wipe out the fossil fuel industry and all the jobs that are part of it. Those on the short end of this stick see no point in cooperating with their tormentors because their pledges always are worthless, and because they are protected by their own vast wealth, the governments and courts they own, and their advertisement of their lethal capabilities and intent via the never-investigated and growing trail of corpses — which today includes their child procurer Jeffrey Epstein — that leads back to the gunmen employed and directed by the Clinton/Obama-built deep state

The foregoing is nothing like a complete list of the tangible and accelerating grievances harbored by the middle-class and blue-collar families who have been and are still being economically and socially savaged by the Democrats and their allies. The list will do for a start, however, and it shows that calls for “unity” do nothing but boost the caller’s ego and feelings of self-worth, while displaying their ignorance and hiding the true intent of the citizenry’s tormentors. The time has come to put things plainly to Democrats, their allies, many Republicans, the media, and much of the bipartisan governing class; Knock it off or get knocked off.

The tormentors of Americans must always remember that they have not yet killed the 2^nd Amendment, and that the duty of American citizens loyal to the Constitution and the republic and Union it created is as clear and legal as can be. Indeed, the willingness of loyal Americans to perform their 2^nd Amendment duties may yet be the only means by which our blessed republic can forever eliminate its many domestic enemies and be preserved intact for generations to come.

Endnotes:

–1.) Thomas Jefferson and John Dickinson, “A Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North-America, Now Met in Congress at Philadelphia, Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking Up Arms,” 6 July 1775, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/arms.asp

–2.) From the 2^nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rights1.asp#2

–3.) King James Version, Psalm 144, https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm+144&version=KJV