–1.) After three years of investigating Russia’s supposed intervention in the 2016 election, and Moscow’s ties to President Trump, the verdict supplied, by the Democrats’ pale-shadow-of-a-superhero Mueller, is that all of it was a hoax. I wonder, if it is proper to invent evidence to frame a president for cooperating with a foreign power, if the FBI’s counterintelligence geniuses have ever conducted an investigation of Senator Bernie Sanders. Sanders, after all, has always expressed empathy with the Soviet Union and its economic ideas, is an ardent admirer of Karl Marx, honeymooned in the USSR, has spent decades paling around with the Ortega brothers, the Castro brothers, and Nicolas Madur0, and visiting the workers’ paradises now operating in Nicaragua and Cuba. In short, he relentlessly has worked to gain first-hand knowledge of how to install the Soviet system in the United States. Some of the best spies maintain a goofy, near-demented public persona — like that of Sanders — as a way to disguise the existence and cleverness of their covert activities. Time for FBI counter-intelligence have a look at the self-professed Soviet-lover Bernie? At least there is a lot of evidence to start with on Sanders, and, after all, turn about always is fair play.
–2.) Rumors are flying here that Virginia governor Ralph Northam and his lieutenants are, after Tuesday’s election win, planning a victory ball to be called “Black Tie and Black Face: A Night in the South we are building”. Details are sketchy, but the current scuttlebutt claims that Northam wants to have a “Pick-a-Ninny” contest during the event. The idea is to have all of the Democratic Party’s congressional leaders come down to Richmond, dress them in formal clothing and blackface, and then form them in a line across the stage facing the audience. Members of the audience then will be randomly chosen to pick the top ninny; that is, the person on the stage who is holding the “super-prize” promised for the winner. There is no super-prize of course — with Democrats it’s always promise, never delivery — this is merely a game to make all attendees winners feel good about themselves. After all, any member of the audience who selects an on-stage Democratic leader cannot fail to pick a demented and thorough-going ninny.
–3.) The most enduring side-splitter since the 2018 mid-terms remains Nancy Pelosi’s enraptured announcement of how the nation was on the high road to salvation because so many women had been elected to the Democratic congressional contingent in November 2018. Now, I was privileged over my working career to work alongside some of the smartest, strongest, savviest, and most self-confident, competitive, perceptive, persuasive, and successful women that can be imagined. Indeed, the ten chances given to Bill Clinton to capture or kill Osama bin Laden by June, 1999, were, to a very substantial extent, attributable to the tireless, often dangerous work of female officers based at Langley and at many posts overseas. My impression was and is that these women and their colleagues spelled the end of anti-female discrimination from the rusticating and often half-wit Old-Boy leadeship at CIA. Did these women have to withstand the animosity of CIA’s Old Boys even as they repeatedly found and targeted bin Laden? You bet they did. While they were breaking their backs to get bin Laden, senior CIA officials – including Coffer Black, now said to be Romney’s foreign affairs adviser, John Brennan, George Tenet, the Deputy Director of Operations Jim Pavitt, and, of course, all of the senior FBI officers engaged in the bin Laden effort, most especially the late, lying cur John O’Neill – ridiculed them, laughing and slapping each other on the back as they referred to the women as “fanatics” and the “Manson Family.”
Times have changed, however, and for the worse. I have long believed that the kind of argument Pelosi made – in essence, more means better — is nothing more than a moron’s chant. The willy-nilly addition of more people to a project has absolutely nothing to do with improving the quality of the project’s staff. More often than not, such a reckless addition of more people lowers the quality and effectiveness of the staff. Pelosi’s pledge that the Democrats can do better because they have more women — or men for that matter — than they had before the 2018 election is evidence of the addled Speaker’s advanced idiocy, previously seen in her having new female members dress as white-robed, Klan members for the State of the Union. Blessed (?) with a huge augmentation of females, Pelosi and the congressional Democrats have accomplished precisely nothing except a further derangement of U.S. society, which, if one recalls Pelosi’s contention, boldly underlines the fact that more usually is nothing more than more. In the case of the Democratic caucus, these new congresswomen are actually a detriment, nay, an obstacle to effective governing. Recalling the horde of perpetually adolescent females of all ages – speaking filth and flamboyantly adorned with pink representations of their private parts — who participated in the post-inaugural women’s march, the case for believing that such women will ruin the republic’s political life is fast becoming an easily defensible one. These disgusting Democratic women, these me-too-ers, in and out of congress, think, speak, and behave in a manner that could be concisely and precisely defined in the plural form of a derisive, four-letter word of German-English-Scandinavian origin, one that slips my mind at the moment. Thank God that the number of Democratic congresswomen and their marching, whining, foul-mouthed, and vulva-badged me-too sisters are a tiny, permanently juvenile, and irrelevant portion of American females, and one that will be swept away by the mass of American women who can think, act, compete, work, and win for themselves.
–4.) Only the globalists’ hoax about human-caused, climate-change is a longer-running sham than the campaign to overthrow President Trump, and it is far beyond the point of being just sophomoric and intolerable. After thirty-five years of predictions of doom, not a one has ever remotely come close to occurring, and this is part of the reason for the just-noted reality. The litany of dead-wrong predictions by these infantile so-called scientists include: Glaciers that refuse to melt, but defiantly grow; sea levels that refuse to rise and remain static; life-promoting carbon dioxide levels trending a bit higher, thereby promoting a to-be-welcomed greening of the earth, rather than its demise; polar bears whose numbers are steadily growing, long after their scientist-promised date of extinction; expanding numbers of icebergs and thicker fields of sea-ice that are reducing to rubble the scientists’ promise of tropical conditions and year-round, clear sailing in the Arctic; and children remain quite able to recognize winter and snow, the disappearance of which the scientists promised long ago.
Simply put, human-caused, climate-change scientists cannot get their forecasts even close to being right. They support their deceitful and evidence-poor predictions with more of the same, and they falsify the historical climate data to fit their multiple and indelibly false predictions of a human-caused climate catastrophe. These scientists remain in the news, fighting the non-existent phantom of human-caused climate change, only because they are on the take from the authoritarian and eternally greedy globalists who want to install, and benefit from, the unending treasure-trove they intend to derive from a humans-enslaving carbon tax. (NB: I would again urge anyone interested in understanding the bone-deep perfidy, lies, and greed of those who lead the human-caused, climate-change fraud to watch and listen to the videos made by a man named Tony Heller. They are available at realclimatescience.com. Mr. Heller speaks softly, but the truth of his words cut like a keen stiletto deep into the scientist-fraudsters. If it matters, I have never met, or spoken to, or corresponded with Mr. Heller.)
This past week, 11,000 “scientific experts” claimed that billions of human beings – apparently mostly from Africa — must be eliminated from the earth to end the human-caused “climate crisis” that in no way currently exists. These scientific experts clearly are government-grant-funded gangsters bent on driving and abusing humans as if they were a herd of disposable tax-paying automatons to fix human-caused climate problems that do not and will not exist. These scientific experts, of course, also are in lockstep with the mass-murdering abortionists, the more quietly murderous geneticists, and the universal-health-care fanatics, freaks who long to cut off medical care for the elderly, the crippled, the terminaly ill, and their political opponents. To me, the best way to address the human-caused climate-change liars is to eliminate them from the earth in the same manner they intend to kill billions of Africans. In this case, not one of the 11,000 of them would be missed, except perhaps by the Clintons, Obamas, Bushes, Gates, and other such human-haters. Time is wasting, and if human beings wish to avoid death-by-climate experts, these hoaxing quack scientists themselves should be the first to be rendered painfully and permanently silent.
–5.) An important event that came to my notice in the past several days is another episode of the sordid criminal affairs of the Biden family. Joe Biden’s brother, James Biden, is reported to have derived many millions of dollars from being part of a group that is building $1.5 billion of inexpensive housing in Iraq; the construction money coming from the U.S. taxpayers. James Biden reportedly knows very little – if anything – about residential construction, and the incident seems to me to be another big-time theft by the Biden family. Much more troubling in regard to James Biden’s apparent scam, however, is the fact that not a single politician, journalist, cleric, or pundit has yet asked the question: “Why are U.S. taxpayers being forced to pay for brand-new housing for Iraqis – most of whom hate America – when so many hard-working, tax-paying U.S. citizens and their kids are in need of either better housing, or simply any kind of housing at all?” The last three administrations – apparently including President Trump’s – have appropriated U.S. tax funds to ensure that many of America’s enemies can live under a roof, cozy and warm. First, Bush and Cheney removed Saddam Hussein, by far America’s most effective partner against Islamist insurgents; second, Bush, Cheney, and Obama facilitated Iran’s expansion from its western border into Iraq, and then onto the Syria-Lebanon border; and, third, the Trump administration and Pelosi/Schumer, are making sure that Iran’s Iraq-based military and civilian people — and/or the Shia Iraqis they favor — are well-housed. This is madness and I, for one, would stop the expenditure of every single tax dollar designated for foreign aid meant to make life better for foreigners – including the republic’s enemies – so long as there is so much to be done at home to assist working Americans. That is, all foreign aid and foreign military-aid must be ended, so that money can be reapplied to the needs of working Americans who cannot make ends meet. If the sight of Iraqis and Iranians lounging about in homes built by American tax dollars does not make American trigger fingers even more itchy, I am not sure what will.
