Michael Scheuer | Non-Intervention

Mr.Trump: This will be short, but, with respect, please pay close attention.

Last week, former-U.S. Attorney Joe diGenova suggested on a FOX program that George Soros and his international, blatantly anti-U.S., and thoroughly anti-freedom organization were enemies of the United States. Mr. diGenova also suggested that Soros has unusually great influence in the actions and policies of U.S. Department of State and its diplomats, embassies, and consulates overseas. Both contentions are obviously true.

Well, one might say, no kidding, Mr. diGenova. But, then again, the hard facts he clearly enunciated seem to have escaped most of the U.S. officials who are charged with the responsibility of destroying U.S. enemies. Many of these men and women — like those that testified to support Schiff last week — appear to prefer to serve themselves, their personal ideologies, and the Democratic Party, rather than the republic’s interests and survival.

Since the diGenova interview, the disloyal Israel-First media across the United States — and in Israel — have damned Mr. diGenova as an anti-Semite and demanded that FOX ban him from its network.

Now, Mr. diGenova was simply and absolutely correct. Since its inception, Israel’s national security policy has been, in part, to ensure that all known Nazis, and those who willingly assisted them in perpetrating the murder of six-million Jews, be captured, tried, convicted, and imprisoned or executed.

The sole deliberate exception to Israel’s eternal and worldwide dragnet, that I know of, is George Soros, who told CBS’s 60 Minutes that he had, during the war, willingly helped in the Nazis’ round-up of Hungarian Jews and the confiscation of their property; that he felt no guilt about what he had done; that it was “the happiest year of my life, that year of German occupation [of Budapest]”; and that the experience of helping to seize the property of Jews taught him how to behave toward others for the rest of his life.. (Listen to the comments of Soros at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8Id0-Lsyr0; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGWizajL7tA)

Notwithstanding this very public admission of his participation in parts of the Holocaust, Soros has never been bothered by the Israeli government. This wartime accomplice to mass murder has been allowed to strut the earth and distribute his billions to groups bent on destroying the Western tradition, republicanism, and Christianity.

Is there another Nazi-accomplice that Israel has permitted to live the good life, flaunt his assistance in the exploitation of  Nazi Jew-killing, and never, for a moment, fear that Israeli justice finally would corner him? I do not remember any. I do recall, however, that Israel secured for retribution a 90-plus year-old and nearly helpless ex-Nazi-prison guard and U.S. citizen – who at the time threatened no one – and then tried and incarcerated him.

Why is Soros free? The only possible explanation of why George Soros is free is that Israel approves of his campaign to destroy the United States, the West, and Christianity, and that it wants him free to keep it rolling along.

As good a question is why has the U.S. Congress not demanded –as it has for other Nazis and their helpers — that U.S. law-enforcement authorities arrest Soros for the “crime against humanity” he claims credit for, and turn him over to Israel for trial. Such a trial, of course, would yield – because he publicly admitted/bragged about his part in Nazi atrocities – the conviction and subsequent execution of this dedicated enemy of America.

The answer, of course, is that Israel and disloyal Jewish-Americans, as well as the organizations and media they own, have suborned most of the U.S. Congress and much of the senior U.S. civil service. These elected officials and senior civil servants allow Soros to continue his accelerating, Democratic-backed effort to destroy the United States because their insatiable greed and/or thirst for office have left them easy marks for Israeli blackmail (perhaps based on materials from Epstein and his crew?), manipulation, and control. Among the Jewish members of the House of Representatives and the Senate, all appear to deliberately have moved, when it comes to Soros, from the territory of being militant “never again-never forgetters” to the lotus land of  ”letting bygones be bygones”

God damn the gang of them, Mr. diGenova, please do America a great, republic-saving favor and hound that bastard Soros with the truth until the U.S. government or Israel feel forced to arrest, try, and deliver to him the execution his actions so richly merit.

The televised impeachment hearings this past week will be very useful for the American people. What each witness said will help the citizenry understand part of the reason why the United States gets into so many wars — U.S. diplomats side with foreign leaders — and why their taxes are spent and wasted in foreign countries, and always are channeled to the local favorites of the Democratic party, particularly to George Soros’s network of subversive, anti-U.S. organizations.

Posing as a demure, Shirley Temple-like innocent, the fierce Democratic partisan Yovanovitch, in particular, explained this to Americans. After preaching to the committee that no government should be allowed to interfere in the elections of another country, she admitted under oath that neither she nor her embassy staff made a single attempt to stop either the then-Ukrainian government’s long and vicious campaign of public attacks on candidate Donald Trump, or its creation of the false evidence which it provided to the FBI to nail Paul Manafort. I wonder how much of a gratuity she got from George Soros and/or Hillary Clinton for doing nothing to protest the pro-Clinton, Ukrainian government’s rhetorical and material intervention in the 2016 election? Yavanovitch also is reported to have arranged the electronic monitoring of U.S. journalists working in Ukraine to investigate the crimes there of the Clinton Foundation, Burisma Energy, and the flamboyant and hysterically inept Biden criminal family.

A few other points about the hearings are worth noting:

–Taylor (who worked for Soros-funded groups), Kent, and Yovanovitch provided no information about improper behavior by President Trump. They did, however, present endless and self-aggrandizing personal views about how U.S. foreign policy should be conducted, as well as their intense resentment of the President for not agreeing with, and following in an unquestioning manner, their sage advice based on long experience. They also resented the President and his advisers for ignoring “inter-agency policy agreements” on which of his policies should be followed and which to ignore. In short, these three senior time-servers were claiming that only senior bureaucrats, rather than the constitutionally designated elected official, ought to formulate and manage U.S. foreign policy.

In my own experience, the inter-agency process is designed for only one purpose, and that is to prevent the full and immediate application of policies that the president has directed to be pursued. During the Soviet-Afghan Communist-Mujahedin War (1979 to 1992), for example, only CIA and NSA reliably labored to implement President Reagan’s policy of driving the Red Army from Afghanistan. The State Department led the effort of other agencies to slow-roll or derail Reagan’s orders in order to protect the Democrats’ beloved Gorbachev and his barbarous Soviet regime. This resistance to Reagan also wanted to provide weapons not to men who would kill Soviets, but to Afghanistan’s Gucci guerrillas, corrupt men who wore suits; talked a lot, often in English; ran heroin internationally; and fought not at all.

–This loathsome diplomat threesome also underscored the enormous difference between Trump’s “America First” foreign policy and their “Ukraine First” foreign policy. Not one of the diplomats could find fault in anything the Ukrainian government wanted U.S. taxpayers to finance. Indeed, they were upset that working stiffs in the United States have not been forced to fork over more of their taxes to help Democratic-allied diplomats like themselves to pal around with the generally corrupt Ukrainian elite, while allowing the latter to stuff their private bank accounts with U.S. tax dollars. This sort of behavior is common to all U.S. diplomats and especially those of ambassadorial rank. They do not represent the republic, but rather the foreign government to which they are accredited. For these people, who are falsely identified as loyal U.S. ambassadors, America is never right and never, ever first. Once installed in a foreign capital, they are the ambassador of the local government – rich, poor, democratic, authoritarian, or tyrannical — in its unending campaign to extort as much money, military assistance, loan guarantees, and other booty from the U.S. government and people as possible. They also actively belittle the president to local government officials and political leaders and assure them it is safe to ignore what he says. Overall, U.S. ambassadors are a lethal, anti-U.S. cult of the savagely self-interested.

–The only true thing that these three sad hacks had to say must have almost caused Schiff’s blood to shoot out of his ears. First, Kent somehow allowed himself to tell the truth, acknowledging that the Ukrainian energy company Burisma is deeply corrupt and that both it and Hunter Biden should have been investigated. Then Yovanovitch slipped and told the truth. She clearly acknowledged to a questioner that she had been briefed by Obama’s gang, before her Senate confirmation hearings, about the increasingly strong stink of corruption that was hanging over Burisma and the drug-using, tossed-from-military Hunter Biden and his father. Obama’s pukes also advised her on what to say and how to deal with the issue in her hearings and during her tenure in Kiev. Interestingly, when asked if the Obama briefers who had prepared her for the Senate hearing had supplied her with the same kind of data about the innumerable number of other deeply corrupt Ukrainian companies, which the three diplomats already had said threatened U.S. interests, Yovanovitch puased for a moment, searched her memory, but could not remember any such data, probably because there were none.

Schiff’s farce will continue for at least another week, but it is now clear that the three star witnesses struck out, and that there is nothing that can be said by those remaining in the parade of clownish witnesses – unless one or more decides to commit perjury — that merits even a passing thought of impeachment. The most positive thing to come out of the hearings so far is the reality of how abominably the U.S. citizenry is served by their State Department and its diplomats. Indeed, the three witnesses made it clear that they are operating to serve the regimes to which they are accredited and themselves. In all cases, the republic, in their view, can take the hindmost

I am being harsh here on U.S. diplomats. My views, however, are shaped by experience. The U.S. ambassador in Saudi Arabia – with his intelligence adviser, John Brennan – worked tirelessly with CIA chief George Tenet, in 1997-1999, to stop all attempts to capture or kill Osama bin Laden. All of them feared the Saudis would be angry at America — and end their payoffs? — if an U.S. attempt to eliminate bin Laden was successful. Earlier, in the mid-1990s, the U.S. ambassador in Qatar and Clinton’s so-called “terrorism czar” forbid the execution of a CIA operation to try and capture an al-Qaida ally named Khalid Shaykh Muhammad. These founts of wisdom asked the Qatari government to arrest the man and turn him over to U.S. authorities. The Qataris snapped to attention and acted immediately — by warning Khalid Shaykh Mohammad and allowing (helping?) him to escape from Qatar without a trace. You may recall, that this fellow – more commonly called KSM – was later to be the operational commander of the 9/11 attacks. Such is traditionally the type of disasters that the State Department and its ambassadors are ready to inflict on their fellow citizens so long as can they keep their host regime happy, and probably their own bread being buttered by the foreigners..

The information in the foregoing paragraph is, of course, well-documented. The verifying documents can readily be found in the archive of the 9/11 Commission. I know this because I hand delivered them in a fat, three-ring binder — double-wrapped for security, of course — to the head of the Commission. For some reason the validating papers in the archive have not yet been published for the review and education of the American people. I believe that the citizenry would find the archive’s papers quite informative. Indeed, they might be so convincing as to make the republic’s collective trigger finger pull, pull, and keep pulling, and so begin to eliminate those who are torturing, fleecing, and deliberately killing the republic, its economy, its laws, its liberties, its cohesion, its children, and its religion.

President Trump, please release those papers. Time to let the cards fall where they may.

–1.) Does Michael Bloomberg carry an Israeli passport as well as a U.S. passport?

–If so, why would he believe that loyal Americans would elect to the presidency a disloyal citizen who has sworn allegiance to a foreign country, and would, if elected, be an agent of a foreign power sitting in the White House? This man merits investigation – if there are any loyal federal law enforcement officials left — and, if he carries an Israeli passport, the candidate must withdraw from the race.

–2.)Why are Ukraine’s interests more vital than U.S. interests?

The impeachment hearing today showed that the U.S. government intends to give Ukraine $700 million or more in American taxpayer money. U.S. national interests would not be hurt a bit if Russia took all of the Ukraine. There still would be, after all, the whole of western Europe and the Atlantic Ocean between the republic and the Russians. What would be hurt, would be Europe’s estimate of its own national security, because the EU governments know they are disarmed, effete, and that Russia’s military could be in Paris in less time than the Wehrmacht’s blitz consumed. So, our $700 million to Ukraine is just another sickening episode of Europe trying to suck the American tit dry and get U.S. citizens to pay for its defense. This European practice started when they bellied up to drink from the Marshall Plan’s trough, and they have not stopped sucking since.

Why in God’s name is that $700 billion not being spent on the genuine domestic interests and needs of the United States? Damn Ukraine and Europe, use the money scheduled to be wasted on them and devote it to feeding malnourished American kids. If any money is left over, use it to build more wall.

–3.) Why is there no due process, civil-liberty and Bill-of-Rights protections, or legal representation being afforded to the President in Congress today?

It appears that the answer could be that these are the new rules of the U.S. rule-of-law game, ones that all Americans must play under. Now, that should mean that – if what’s good for the goose, is good for the gander — all loyal U.S. citizens ought to be able to identify the Democrats who have unleashed the diseased and criminal alien-foreigner tidal wave on them; destroyed their education system, and with it the minds of the young; created a halo-crowned horde of sexual deviants who are valued, rewarded, and protected more than normal Americans, especially children; given – as in Ukraine – trillions of dollars to foreigners while Americans are hungry, without homes, seriously ill, unemployed, or barely making ends meet. Under the new rules being installed by the Democrats, it seems that Americans are free to identify their Democratic enemies, refuse them due process, and dispose of them as they wish. This might be an especially good development for contemporary Blacks, Asians, Catholics, and Southerners, all of whom deserve some revenge for the Democrat’s abuse of them through their first terrorist organization, the Ku Klux Klan; their effective retarding of U.S. economic growth; and their use of abortion to gradually wipe out the Black American community, a process that has so far killed more than 61 million Americans.

If, in time, the foregoing turns out to be the new American way of law, the only sound advice for loyal Americans is to buy plenty of ammunition and rope, pick your own targets, and, if it becomes necessary, do what seems necessary to eliminate the enemy. The Democrats will find that loyal Americans can also play the arrogant, Stalinist, and murderous Schiff-Pelosi-Shumer-Obama-Clinton game. Again, turn-about always is fair play — and often very satisfying.

–1.) After three years of investigating Russia’s supposed intervention in the 2016 election, and Moscow’s ties to President Trump, the verdict supplied, by the Democrats’ pale-shadow-of-a-superhero Mueller, is that all of it was a hoax. I wonder, if it is proper to invent evidence to frame a president for cooperating with a foreign power, if the FBI’s counterintelligence geniuses have ever conducted an investigation of Senator Bernie Sanders. Sanders, after all, has always expressed empathy with the Soviet Union and its economic ideas, is an ardent admirer of Karl Marx, honeymooned in the USSR, has spent decades paling around with the Ortega brothers, the Castro brothers, and Nicolas Madur0, and visiting the workers’ paradises now operating in Nicaragua and Cuba. In short, he relentlessly has worked to gain first-hand knowledge of how to install the Soviet system in the United States. Some of the best spies maintain a goofy, near-demented public persona — like that of Sanders — as a way to disguise the existence and cleverness of their covert activities. Time for FBI counter-intelligence have a look at the self-professed Soviet-lover Bernie? At least there is a lot of evidence to start with on Sanders, and, after all, turn about always is fair play.

–2.) Rumors are flying here that Virginia governor Ralph Northam and his lieutenants are, after Tuesday’s election win, planning a victory ball to be called “Black Tie and Black Face: A Night in the South we are building”. Details are sketchy, but the current scuttlebutt claims that Northam wants to have a “Pick-a-Ninny” contest during the event. The idea is to have all of the Democratic Party’s congressional leaders come down to Richmond, dress them in formal clothing and blackface, and then form them in a line across the stage facing the audience. Members of the audience then will be randomly chosen to pick the top ninny; that is, the person on the stage who is holding the “super-prize” promised for the winner. There is no super-prize of course — with Democrats it’s always promise, never delivery — this is merely a game to make all attendees winners feel good about themselves. After all, any member of the audience who selects an on-stage Democratic leader cannot fail to pick a demented and thorough-going ninny.

–3.) The most enduring side-splitter since the 2018 mid-terms remains Nancy Pelosi’s enraptured announcement of how the nation was on the high road to salvation because so many women had been elected to the Democratic congressional contingent in November 2018. Now, I was privileged over my working career to work alongside some of the smartest, strongest, savviest, and most self-confident, competitive, perceptive, persuasive, and successful women that can be imagined. Indeed, the ten chances given to Bill Clinton to capture or kill Osama bin Laden by June, 1999, were, to a very substantial extent, attributable to the tireless, often dangerous work of female officers based at Langley and at many posts overseas. My impression was and is that these women and their colleagues spelled the end of anti-female discrimination from the rusticating and often half-wit Old-Boy leadeship at CIA. Did these women have to withstand the animosity of CIA’s Old Boys even as they repeatedly found and targeted bin Laden? You bet they did. While they were breaking their backs to get bin Laden, senior CIA officials – including Coffer Black, now said to be Romney’s foreign affairs adviser, John Brennan, George Tenet, the Deputy Director of Operations Jim Pavitt, and, of course, all of the senior FBI officers engaged in the bin Laden effort, most especially the late, lying cur John O’Neill – ridiculed them, laughing and slapping each other on the back as they referred to the women as “fanatics” and the “Manson Family.”

Times have changed, however, and for the worse. I have long believed that the kind of argument Pelosi made – in essence, more means better — is nothing more than a moron’s chant. The willy-nilly addition of more people to a project has absolutely nothing to do with improving the quality of the project’s staff. More often than not, such a reckless addition of more people lowers the quality and effectiveness of the staff. Pelosi’s pledge that the Democrats can do better because they have more women — or men for that matter — than they had before the 2018 election is evidence of the addled Speaker’s advanced idiocy, previously seen in her having new female members dress as white-robed, Klan members for the State of the Union. Blessed (?) with a huge augmentation of females, Pelosi and the congressional Democrats have accomplished precisely nothing except a further derangement of U.S. society, which, if one recalls Pelosi’s contention, boldly underlines the fact that more usually is nothing more than more. In the case of the Democratic caucus, these new congresswomen are actually a detriment, nay, an obstacle to effective governing. Recalling the horde of perpetually adolescent females of all ages – speaking filth and flamboyantly adorned with pink representations of their private parts — who participated in the post-inaugural women’s march, the case for believing that such women will ruin the republic’s political life is fast becoming an easily defensible one. These disgusting Democratic women, these me-too-ers, in and out of congress, think, speak, and behave in a manner that could be concisely and precisely defined in the plural form of a derisive, four-letter word of German-English-Scandinavian origin, one that slips my mind at the moment. Thank God that the number of Democratic congresswomen and their marching, whining, foul-mouthed, and vulva-badged me-too sisters are a tiny, permanently juvenile, and irrelevant portion of American females, and one that will be swept away by the mass of American women who can think, act, compete, work, and win for themselves.

–4.) Only the globalists’ hoax about human-caused, climate-change is a longer-running sham than the campaign to overthrow President Trump, and it is far beyond the point of being just sophomoric and intolerable. After thirty-five years of predictions of doom, not a one has ever remotely come close to occurring, and this is part of the reason for the just-noted reality. The litany of dead-wrong predictions by these infantile so-called scientists include: Glaciers that refuse to melt, but defiantly grow; sea levels that refuse to rise and remain static; life-promoting carbon dioxide levels trending a bit higher, thereby promoting a to-be-welcomed greening of the earth, rather than its demise; polar bears whose numbers are steadily growing, long after their scientist-promised date of extinction; expanding numbers of icebergs and thicker fields of sea-ice that are reducing to rubble the scientists’ promise of tropical conditions and year-round, clear sailing in the Arctic; and children remain quite able to recognize winter and snow, the disappearance of which the scientists promised long ago.

Simply put, human-caused, climate-change scientists cannot get their forecasts even close to being right. They support their deceitful and evidence-poor predictions with more of the same, and they falsify the historical climate data to fit their multiple and indelibly false predictions of a human-caused climate catastrophe. These scientists remain in the news, fighting the non-existent phantom of human-caused climate change, only because they are on the take from the authoritarian and eternally greedy globalists who want to install, and benefit from, the unending treasure-trove they intend to derive from a humans-enslaving carbon tax. (NB: I would again urge anyone interested in understanding the bone-deep perfidy, lies, and greed of those who lead the human-caused, climate-change fraud to watch and listen to the videos made by a man named Tony Heller. They are available at realclimatescience.com. Mr. Heller speaks softly, but the truth of his words cut like a keen stiletto deep into the scientist-fraudsters. If it matters, I have never met, or spoken to, or corresponded with Mr. Heller.)

This past week, 11,000 “scientific experts” claimed that billions of human beings – apparently mostly from Africa — must be eliminated from the earth to end the human-caused “climate crisis” that in no way currently exists. These scientific experts clearly are government-grant-funded gangsters bent on driving and abusing humans as if they were a herd of disposable tax-paying automatons to fix human-caused climate problems that do not and will not exist. These scientific experts, of course, also are in lockstep with the mass-murdering abortionists, the more quietly murderous geneticists, and the universal-health-care fanatics, freaks who long to cut off medical care for the elderly, the crippled, the terminaly ill, and their political opponents. To me, the best way to address the human-caused climate-change liars is to eliminate them from the earth in the same manner they intend to kill billions of Africans. In this case, not one of the 11,000 of them would be missed, except perhaps by the Clintons, Obamas, Bushes, Gates, and other such human-haters. Time is wasting, and if human beings wish to avoid death-by-climate experts, these hoaxing quack scientists themselves should be the first to be rendered painfully and permanently silent.

–5.) An important event that came to my notice in the past several days is another episode of the sordid criminal affairs of the Biden family. Joe Biden’s brother, James Biden, is reported to have derived many millions of dollars from being part of a group that is building $1.5 billion of inexpensive housing in Iraq; the construction money coming from the U.S. taxpayers. James Biden reportedly knows very little – if anything – about residential construction, and the incident seems to me to be another big-time theft by the Biden family. Much more troubling in regard to James Biden’s apparent scam, however, is the fact that not a single politician, journalist, cleric, or pundit has yet asked the question: “Why are U.S. taxpayers being forced to pay for brand-new housing for Iraqis – most of whom hate America – when so many hard-working, tax-paying U.S. citizens and their kids are in need of either better housing, or simply any kind of housing at all?” The last three administrations – apparently including President Trump’s – have appropriated U.S. tax funds to ensure that many of America’s enemies can live under a roof, cozy and warm. First, Bush and Cheney removed Saddam Hussein, by far America’s most effective partner against Islamist insurgents; second, Bush, Cheney, and Obama facilitated Iran’s expansion from its western border into Iraq, and then onto the Syria-Lebanon border; and, third, the Trump administration and Pelosi/Schumer, are making sure that Iran’s Iraq-based military and civilian people — and/or the Shia Iraqis they favor — are well-housed. This is madness and I, for one, would stop the expenditure of every single tax dollar designated for foreign aid meant to make life better for foreigners – including the republic’s enemies – so long as there is so much to be done at home to assist working Americans. That is, all foreign aid and foreign military-aid must be ended, so that money can be reapplied to the needs of working Americans who cannot make ends meet. If the sight of Iraqis and Iranians lounging about in homes built by American tax dollars does not make American trigger fingers even more itchy, I am not sure what will.

I received the below note from some NPR journalist last night; he is apparently cooperating with Britain’s anti-Trump Independent. You will note the NPR journalist’s intense anti-Trump prejudice and how he uses the idea that the “deep state” must be honored and protected for what it is doing to President Trump and the republic. My response follows the journalist’s note.

Also, as you read the note, please remember that your tax dollars are paying for this guy’s salary and the thoroughly anti-American NPR network, which appears to be cooperating with foreigners to try to oust the president.

—————————————————————–

From: Bobby Allyn <outbound@mygovcost.org>
To: Michael Scheuer <scheuermf@aol.com>
Cc: aluther <aluther@independent.org>; dtheroux <dtheroux@independent.org>; ptheroux <ptheroux@independent.org>; rade <rade@independent.org>
Sent: Sat, Nov 2, 2019 6:44 pm
Subject: WEBFORM: NPR Calling

Hi Michael,

Bobby Allyn here, reporter with National Public Radio in Washington. I’m working on a story about efforts of right-wing trolls to out “deep state operatives” who are really just career civil servants and career foreign service officers. It’s relevant now with conservative media outlets trying to out the Trump whistleblower. I’m not interested in outing any names, but instead I’m trying to examine the larger picture of how aggressive online smear campaigns fueled by right-wing media (and even some members of Congress) impact civil servants, who already have a difficult job to do. I’m looking at how conspiracy theories that implicate current and former White House officials can cause really harm, not to mention endless threats, to people who have served the country honorably in highly-placed positions. I’d like to chat with you about the importance of keeping whistleblower identifies anonymous, and how outing a whistleblower could not only put that individual in danger, but could discourage others from speaking up.

I’m wondering if you would be willing to speak with me about this? I have until Monday evening to wrap up this story. Please let me know if you have a few minutes.

Thanks and best,

Bobby

———————————————————————-

You got the wrong number asking me. The deep-state shitbirds are real, fascist, going down and none of your troll or conspiracy nonsense can stop what is going to happen. This whole business will not be over until Obama, his gang, and the mainstream media are indicted, tried, convicted, and hung. That will be, indeed, the happiest of days, hopefully televised. Check my blog site if you care to understand what is going on: non-intervention2.com

Mike Scheuer

After today’s vote in Congress to begin the process of impeaching President Trump, the citizenry should insist that the process must stop for a week or forever how long it takes to rid the Congress and Senate of every member and staffer who holds a passport other than that of the United States.

Commonsense and settled law cannot be imagined to sanction the impeachment of the President of the United States by men and women who think so little of their country to have pledged allegiance to another country. No person can serve two different masters, as the adage warns, and certainly no person who has documented his loyalty to another country can be allowed to decide on the future of a chief magistrate who was legitimately elected by the American people.

The easiest way to begin the process of culling of these traitors is to identify and then permanently remove any congressman, senator, or congressional staffer that holds an Israeli passport. The reality that anyone so identified is a traitor is completely established by his or her deliberately pledging allegiance to Israel; such a pledge is a requirement for getting a passport from any government on earth. My own hunch is that when this joyful harvest of traitors is completed, Americans will see that there are very few congressman and senators who have the legitimate right to sit in judgment of the president. The Congress as a whole, on this issue, seems to be a hive of traitors.

Once accomplished, Americans must demand that the same culling of those U.S. citizens who have pledged allegiance to Israel be rapidly and thoroughly conducted in every agency of the executive branch – including the White House, the Pentagon and all military components, the State Department, the CIA, the FBI, etc. – and then in all levels of the judicial branch, including the Supreme Court.

After these initial harvests are completed, the three branches of the national government must be re-culled for people holding any kind of second passport, be it from Ireland, Pakistan, Britain, China, South Africa, Panama, or any other country on the planet.

After all, only loyal Americans – loyalty as documented by their holding a U.S. passport and no other – should deal with American problems and decide the nation’s domestic and foreign policies. Ridding the national government of dual-passport holders will eliminate a longstanding and republic-killing fifth-column, while concurrently powering the greater growth and durability of the patriotic America First movement.

And to ensure that this disloyal scourge of dual-passported individuals does not return, the beginning of wisdom is to mandate that all political candidates for office in the national government be made to acknowledge under oath they do not hold another nation’s passport. Such a mandated, under-oath acknowledgement must also be made by all Americans seeking employment in the federal civil service and the U.S. military and intelligence services.

At times, I wonder if any Democrat can see what is really going on. Or why what is going on is making sure that there will be (a) trials, convictions, and executions of leading Democrats for treason, espionage, corruption, and murder, or (b) martial law, or (c) civil war. One or more of these three possibilities must occur before social cohesiveness and common-feeling can begin to be restored among the nation’s citizens. Recent events suggest confrontation is near.

–Speaker Pelosi and Congressman Schiff went to Jordan to enlist the assistance of King Abdullah in both their Constitution-defying war against President Trump, and their effort to make sure that American kids keep getting killed in unnecessary interventionist wars. One also wonders if Pelosi and Schiff were in Jordan to try and warn Baghdadi. With the large number of traitors that Obama left behind across the government, it is a mistake to think there was no leak, or at least a hint, of something being up regarding Baghdadi, though that Democratic leak, in this case, did not get U.S. military personal killed. It also did not save the putrid life of the longtime terrorist who was a friend of Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer, McCain, Graham, Kerry, and an as yet unknown number of treacherous general officers.

–Pelsoi, Schumer, and many other Democrats, journalists, former-CIA officers turned shitbirds, and movie stars are crying crocodile tears because IS leader Baghdadi was killed by U.S. Special Forces, as well as because President Trump described their sparkling operation and the dog Baghdadi’s death in words that are familiar and welcome to any non-elite American – including all non-general-officer military personnel – and which describe their feelings perfectly. Only the European-wannabe, bipartisan U.S. governing elite could be offended by Trump’s words. Indeed, those words may be the best Americans have heard from any recent president about the national government’s intent to eradicate genuine threats to the United States – which the lack of democracy, freedom, secularism, or women’s rights abroad are not – since U.S. Admiral Halsey correctly and directly advised that the way to win the Pacific War was to “kill Japs, kill Japs, and kill more Japs.”

–Finally, the disgraceful conduct of the full-house at Nationals Stadium in booing and mocking the president who had just directed the U.S. military to kill a deadly enemy of the republic, and then honored Major League Baseball by attending a World Series game, will live forever in the memories of anti-Democrat Americans. The event will be recalled by Americans not only as an attack on President Trump and his family, but also as an attack on them, their families, their republic, and – in an increasingly affectionate way – their president. It also will convince the few Americans who have resisted the fact that Washington, D.C. really is the fetid, stinking, and disease-and-corruption spreading asshole of the United States.

So, a hard future awaits these enemies of the republic, and whether it be by trials and hangings, martial law, of civil war, fierce retribution will be delivered to the Democratic Party and its apparatchiks for the pain, poverty, and savage social and tax policies they have for decades deliberately inflicted on non-elite Americans, most especially those in the Midwest, the South, and all along the southern border.

After Franklin Roosevelt and his British-manipulated administration had artfully driven Japan to begin war against America in December 1941, he made a speech asking for a declaration of war that rightfully stands as one of the best made by any American. A portion of that speech will suffice for warning the Democrats about the price they are going to pay for so long abusing working and middle-class Americans. It must be said that between most Americans and the Democrats – as FDR said in December 1941 after Japan’s attack —

“Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our interests are in grave danger. With confidence in our armed forces — with the unbounding determination of our people — we will gain the inevitable triumph — so help us God.” (1)

While carrying no brief for the deceitful, war-wanting Roosevelt, his words ring as true today as they did in 1941. Let us work to ensure the definitive end result against Japan that was promised and accomplished by Roosevelt will be again applied against the lethal social, economic, and atheist scourge that is today’s Democratic Party.

-Endnote:

–1.) For FDR’s full speech, see, https://www.loc.gov/resource/afc1986022.afc1986022_ms2201/?st=text

–1.) U.S. Special Forces killed Islamic State (IS) leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi last night in what, from all reports, was a stunningly professional operation. Some U.S. government officials are saying that the plan was to capture al-Baghdadi alive; praise God that part of the plan failed utterly. This event winds up all the United States needs to do in the region. Russian ground and air forces and unleashed U.S. air power demolished IS’s geographical caliphate and severely culled IS manpower. With Al-Baghdadi’s death, there is no reason to remain in Syria and Iraq. (NB: Any sane reason for staying in Afghanistan has long been missing). President’s Trump explicit message to the region’s countries – amounting to, “So long, over to you” – is in line with the republic’s most pressing national interests, and hopefully signals Trump’s intent to quickly end America’s role in the remaining interventionist wars; bring all U.S. forces home; and thereby give U.S. generals a chance to begin to conceive a doctrine that includes the use of main force so that future war-fighting eras do not have to be measured in decades.

–2.) While my family and I were waiting to hear President Trump speak this morning, the British radio network LCB called me asked that I do an interview about the event. Just as we were about to begin the interview, the interviewer pulled away to let his audience – and me – listen to the President’s announcement. I listened for a bout 90 seconds or two minutes and walked out into the kitchen to see what my family thought about what the President was saying. When I came into the kitchen, there was NBC’s Chuck Todd interviewing some former intelligence- community dirt-bag discussing why it is still a mistake for the U.S. military to depart from Syria. In other words, LBC’s listeners in Britain were listening to the President speak, while NBC, Todd, and the guest were trying to get a last dig into Trump before letting American viewers hear what the president had to say. After Mr. Trump’s announcement, I did the interview, but I bet most NBC-watchers do not know that Todd and his network delayed their access to the president’s talk for partisan political reasons.

–3.) For what it’s worth, during the LCB interview, I reminded those Brits who were listening that all of the American and Western blood and treasure that has been spilled and spent in the Middle East since May, 1998, is the direct result of either the abject cowardice, or a willingness to accept payoffs from Arabs, of Bill Clinton, George Tenet, Richard Clarke, John Brennan, and a host of other Democratic apparatchiks in the White House, the Pentagon, and the federal bureaucracy, all of whom refused to try and kill Osama bin Laden. I told the interviewer that between May, 1998, and June, 1999, Clinton and his gang of misfits were presented with ten chances to try and kill bin Laden, but refused to attempt even one of them. At the time, Brennan was stationed on the Arab peninsula and refused to request the data we needed from the Saudis; he wrote in a cable that our requests upset them. Then, on the eve of an attempt to capture bin Laden – a plan reviewed and approved by the U.S. Special Forces command, which had been forbidden by the Joint Chiefs to actively assist the plan – Brennan used his back-channel to Tenet and Clinton’s White House and told them he could arrange a meeting with the Saudi king, and that the king and his colleagues would arrange the turnover or apprehension of bin Laden. Clinton, et. al, quickly agreed, the meeting was held, and the Saudis thereafter did nothing to get bin Laden. Clinton, perhaps drunk, confirmed many of these facts in a videotaped meeting with businessmen in Australia on 10 September 2011. In that talk, he told the audience that he absolutely had multiple chances to kill bin Laden, but if civilians got killed in the process, he believed that he would not be any better than bin Laden. (NB: I would like to watch Clinton tell that to the kin of every U.S. military person or civilian killed by Islamists since May 1998, and see if he gets out alive. For the tape of Clinton a day before 9/11, see, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Z-BTgjVmEo),

The fact that Clinton and his gang are haunted by their deliberate failure can be seen weekly in a television program called Looming Tower, which is written by the novelist and Democratic shill Lawrence Wright. The series is called a docudrama and has no contact points with reality. The script makes the Clinton administration and the FBI the heroes of the tale; myself and all the CIA officers who risked their lives to give Clinton his chances are, of course, the bad guys. In July, 2017, I wrote a letter to the series’ producer, Legendary Television, after learning what this farcical program was to be about, saying that their story was more or less a total lie. I got a snot-nosed letter back from a fool named Jennifer Grazier at Legendary that said something like “a docudrama is free to be flexible with the truth of a story to make it attractive to the audience.” Well she was surely correct as Wright’s series savages the truth to hide the responsibility of Clinton, Tenet, Brennan, and many others in that administration for the carnage and expense that has befallen Americans and the people of the region since May, 1998.

A final note. When I reminded the LBC interviewer of the foregoing facts, he asked if I was telling him that Clinton had a chance to stop 20 years of war. I said yes, I was there, and I would swear what I said was true on a stack of bibles while under oath.

Enough, once again, is enough. The raging hysteria of the opposition to President Trump’s decision to leave Syria comes not only from the AIPAC-bribed Congress, but from numerous retired generals and their former sycophants among retired lieutenant-colonels and colonels. All of this nonsense rhetoric, along with their pathetic war-fighting performance since the 9/11 attacks, shows why all the U.S. generals charged with defeating al-Qaeda (AQ) and the Islamic State (IS) ought to be required to have an “L” — for loser — tattooed across their foreheads.

AQ, IS, and other Islamist insurgent groups remain a threat because America’s generals are failures and moral cowards. They did not defeat the enemy, and they have led their men and women into combat in wars that they knew the president did not intend to win. Not a single one of these multi-starred cretins resigned to tell the American people about the lethal con game that was being played on them and the lives of their soldier-children. They preferred to remain silent; take their pay, housing, and other benefits; and patiently wait until they can retire and go directly to the cash-awash world of corporate directorships in the arms-making industry.

The American people have given these generals enormous amounts of tax money and great numbers of talented young people for their use in annihilating the republic’s enemies. That, after all, is the only goal of any war; if it is not, no war should be fought. U.S. generals dabble with war and get what their efforts richly merit; namely, failure, defeat, and humiliation.  Given thoroughbreds by the citizenry, the generals have used them as plow horses, driving them ever deeper into the bloody mire and leaving them stuck there for decades at a time, while they pursued the idiocy of “small foot-print strategies” and swore undying allegiance to the moronic idea that wars can be won with special forces and air power, rather than main force.

The generals’ non-leadership and callous attitude toward their troops has produced precisely the disaster that General Douglas MacArthur saw coming during the Korean War, especially the doctrine of “limited warfare” that was being applied in that conflict. “[T]here are only three ways [to wage war],” MacArthur told a congressional committee,

“Either pursue it to victory; to surrender to the enemy and end it on his terms; or what I think is the worst of all choices – to go on indefinitely and indefinitely, neither win or lose, in that stalemate; because what we are doing is sacrificing thousands of men while we are doing it.” [1]

MacArthur somehow saw the exact nature of post-Korean War, American war-making, but he probably would not have believed that his successors as senior U.S. general officers invariably would follow what he called the “worst of all choices”. In so doing, America’s postwar general officers have not won a single war, and, in the case of Afghanistan, they have, in reality, been defeated by a vastly inferior enemy and have allowed thousands of U.S. troops to die or be maimed during two decades of ass-backward war-making that have allowed the ever-patient Islamists fighters to prevail.

In addition, these brain-dead generals – with the approval of presidents and Congresses that share their risk aversion and unconcern for U.S. interests – have been delighted to delegate the responsibility of defeating America’s enemies to third parties, including Kurds, Afghans, Pakistanis, and any other Third Worlder who comes along with an AK-47 in one hand; his other hand poised to dip into Uncle Sam’s pocket; and an ability to say “I want democracy” in broken English. The generals and politicians always label these mercenaries as “allies” and lavish them with arms and taxpayer cash, even though they share almost no common ground with the United States; are fighting –as they should — for their own and their country, clan, or tribal interests, not ours; and will turn and kill U.S. military personnel as the whim moves them.

If there is a potent enemy of the republic’s survival active in the field, presidents, Congresses, and generals must man-up and act as adults who are willing to do America’s dirty work and utterly destroy that enemy root and branch. They must never be allowed to delegate that job to a motley array of usually anti-U.S. foreigners who have never, in the last half-century, succeeded in doing the job for which they were paid.

The time has come for a decisive thinning of a general-officer corps that is the antithesis of praiseworthy, even in the simplest of things. Polybius, the great historian who authored the Rise of the Roman Empire, wrote that “it is the duty of the commander to know when he is beaten, no less than when he is victorious.” [1] Even this task is beyond our generals, who can only speak of “a light at the end of the tunnel”, or that there is “no military solution to this war”, or that “more troops and money are the road to victory”, or “this is a multi-generational war, so be patient”. Such phrases are meant only to obfuscate their continual failure: their studying-in-the-Ivy-League-produced effeminacy: and their resolute willingness to trade the lives and limbs of our soldier-children for a defeat they recognize but will not speak of. In the 17^th and 18^th centuries the rank-and-file of European and American armies were often assessed to be “the scum of the earth.” Currently, when contrasting American generals and their troops, that five-word assessment remains correct, but now applies to most of the general-officer corps.

The best way to understand what war requires is to recall what you saw and experienced in the schoolyard as a kid. That environment taught all who paid attention that when you are attacked you must respond in a way that spoke of fearlessness and reciprocal ill-intent. The schoolyard taught that only an immediate, fierce response both ended a confrontation and its potential for continuation.

War is the same in principle, but is much more deadly. War requires a readiness to wipe out the attacker and his war-making assets and supporters. But, just as in the schoolyard, if you are attacked and respond in a milquetoast manner – as did the U.S. government and its military in Afghanistan – the enemy, especially if he is weaker than the entity he attacked, will conclude that you are not serious and can be beaten.

In a book of rare incisiveness, Honor. A History, James Bowman makes the foregoing point about war brilliantly.

[T]he international order throughout human history has been founded on the playground hierarchy writ large. Dominant nations and their leaders are expected to give demonstrations of their dominance so as to avoid the necessity of having to establish it by fighting. When such demonstrations are ambiguous or unconvincing, fighting and all that it implies of heartbreak and misery ensues. It may not be a very good system of maintaining international order, but it is the only one we have got. And, I think interestingly, the only won we have ever had. (3)

Obviously, U.S. general officers have no conception of what Mr. Bowman is talking about in the foregoing comment. Americans are certainly lucky, however, that General Mattis and the Pentagon grumbled publicly and dragged their feet when President Trump asked them to help close the southern border. Their public slow-rolling of the President during a clear national emergency allowed the citizenry to learn that neither the lives of U.S. citizens nor those of U.S. troops matter much to the republic’s current crop of general officers.

–Endnotes:

–1.) Polybius. The Rise of the Roman Empire. New York: Penguin Books, 1979, p. 108.

–2.) General MacArthur is quoted in James Bowman. Honor. A History. New York: Encounter Books, 2006, p. 196

–3.) Ibid., p. 321

The hysterical bipartisan and media opposition to President Trump’s correct decision to withdraw less than 30 U.S. troops from northern Syria is an important learning opportunity not to be missed. What was the job that Obama’s administration and pliant U.S. general officers assigned to those troops? Well, they were there as what was called during the Cold War a “tripwire”. This is an obfuscating way of saying “they were there to die.” Those troops were there because both parties wanted a bigger war in the region, but they knew Americans wanted no part of such a thing.

How to turn that situation around? Simple, by basing a number of sacrificial U.S. service personnel in the middle of a war zone. Sooner or later, of course, such a small force’s number will come up, and some of the troops will die and or be wounded. With American blood spilled, the governing elite would exploit the citizenry’s deep patriotism and desire for retribution and launch the United States into another unnecessary and wasteful war. The elite’s best known con on the American people would have worked again.

Now the chance of the U.S. elite using this con to turn affairs in northern Syria into a large U.S.-led war has dissipated. President Trump rolled up the tripwire and brought it home, and the fighting in the area belongs to those who either live there or want to be there. Now is the time for Americans to make the governing elite abide by their own word by asking a few questions. Following are four that need to be answered in a manner that fully meets U.S. national security interests:

–Q: Who is fighting in northern Syria now?

–A: Syria, Russia, Turkey, and Syrian and Turkish Kurds.

–Q: What commonality can be found among these combatant entities?

–A: The U.S. government and military, the bipartisan governing elite, and the media have for decades identified four of them as enemies of the republic; Russia and Syria as nation-state enemies, and the Syrian and Turkish Kurds as terrorist enemies. They also identify Turkey as an enemy whenever it suits their political convenience.

–Q: Does that mean that four full-time and one part-time U.S. enemy are fighting and killing each other in a remote and landlocked region almost 6,000 miles from Washington D.C.?

–A: That is correct

–Q: Should Americans care about what goes on in the war there, or even about who wins?

–A: Only those who are more insane than the average Democrat presidential candidate.

A final word for Americans examining the situation along The Turkey-Syria border. The U.S. governing elite is claiming that the Islamic State (IS) fighters imprisoned in the region will be released by the Syrian Kurds, and that is true enough. But so what? U.S. and Russian air assets and Syrian and Russian ground forces destroyed the physical ISIS Caliphate, which was IS’s most important attraction for much of the Muslim world’s militant Islamist population. The released fighters will have the choice of going home, fighting with the largely Sunni Kurds against three IS enemies – Turkey, Syria, and Russia – or trying to move into Iraq, Afghanistan, or Yemen. U.S. forces are likely to be totally withdrawn from Iraq and Afghanistan before long, and so – for the United States – whatever those fighters decide to do will be no more than a temporary annoyance. If the released IS fighters decide to try to rebuild the caliphate where it once stood, it will be up to the Europeans, Turkey, Syria, Russia, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the other Gulf tyrannies to defeat them.

No doubt the gang of U.S. war-mongers will shrilly claim that the released IS fighters will come to the United States and fight us here. This is a truly silly claim. IS has no navy or shipping, and floating across the Atlantic with their ordnance on inner tubes is problematic. In addition, President Trump and Secretary Pompeo appear to be eradicating the pro-Islamist rot from the State Department’s staff and so visas for terrorists – like those given to the San Bernardino shooters – will no longer be issued. Next, the construction of the southern border wall is progressing and will be completed before too much longer. That wall is today – as it was on 12 September 2001 – the single most important and effective U.S. anti-Islamist defense measure.

Finally, when all U.S. combat forces are out of Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, the importance of the American target to ISIS and other Islamist insurgent groups will drop markedly. After all, they hate Americans today – as they did on 12 September 2001 – not for who we are or how we live and think in North America, but because they believe – with some reason – that the U.S. government has long tried to destroy their religion, culture, traditions, mores, and history and has sent its military forces to protect Israel and tyrannical Muslim governments, as well as to occupy Muslim territory. Getting out of the region may not make the Islamist heart grow fonder of the United States, but it surely will refocus the Islamist eye on the remaining host of enemies they must confront and defeat after we are gone.