Michael Scheuer | Non-Intervention

Now that the funeral festival staged for John McCain has concluded, it is worth considering a couple of attendant issues.

The first is a question. Why were veterans’ organizations so insistent that the flag be flown at half-mast for McCain for multiple days? Yes, he was a veteran and a POW. He also consistently sought ever-larger appropriations for the Department of Defense. But in the ranks of today’s veterans there are an inordinate number of men and women who survived the unnecessary and interventionist wars that McCain relentlessly advocated and often caused. These men and women are also the comrades of the many thousands of Marines and soldiers who were killed, wounded, or maimed in those unnecessary wars, or who have killed themselves from the enduring, debilitating, and ultimately fatal impact of their military service.

These younger veterans know that they were sent to wars in which the republic did not have a dog in the fight; that they were sent to wars that their political leaders and generals were not going to allow them to win; and that it was people like McCain that drove a slow-motion, overseas U.S. military bloodbath for most of the past 30 years. One day at half-mast would have been more than enough – perhaps too much – to honor McCain as a former POW. He surely did not merit the four days of officially mandated grief, which was stage-managed by the bilateral and thoroughly Neocon political and media establishment. Their program was intentionally inflicted on veterans who suffered from the endless, always McCain-led war-making, as well as on the parents and families of those that McCain insisted be sent to their deaths in his always ego-satisfying but always unnecessary, useless, and unending wars.

The second issue lies in the nature of most of the crowd that filled the National Cathedral for McCain’s third – but not last – funeral service. Taken as a whole, those who filled the pews are the enemies of all Americans who value the lives of their soldier-children, who believe a war only ought to be fought in self-defense, and the growing numbers of those who are seeing the extraordinary costs in lives, limbs, treasure, and civil liberties that the political establishment’s post-1945 military interventionism abroad has yielded.

The elite crowd in the National Cathedral wept and spoke as if they were praising McCain, but the attendees were really there to praise interventionism and unnecessary wars, and to make an arrogant but – pray God — specious assertion that they are still in control the nation’s destiny. That assertion was their priority, and those attending the service did not care enough about honoring McCain’s memory – after all, he can no longer cause more wars – to prevent them from turning the occasion into an attack on the current president, the economic successes his team has scored, and the unnecessary wars he seems intent on gradually snuffing out. That this outrageously inappropriate, in-church, partisan political attack was led by McCain’s daughter suggests that more war is more important to these people than anything else, even the solemnity of the event and her Dad’s memory.

The final issue is a more hope than fact. It seems appropriate that McCain went to his reward just as an issue emerged that would have wet his war-mongering whistle. The media reports that the Russian and Iranian militaries are preparing to stage a campaign in the Idlib area of Syria, which is identified as the “last” Islamist stronghold in the country. This contention, of course, is the standard media/military/government lie; Islamist guerrilla groups remain present throughout both Syria and Iraq, and, although they solidly hold little ground, they are attacking in both countries, particularly in Iraq. Anyway, the reality is, for Americans, that it does not matter a whit whether Iranian and Russian forces are triumphant or are beaten like a drum. The outcome will be what it will be, and neither result will be any skin off the republic’s nose. The media also report that the coming campaign may create a “humanitarian disaster” in Idlib, a message that McCain and his war-adoring ilk loved to mix with their hatred of Russia, Iran, or any other of their endless enemies-of-the-day as a formula for forcing America into unnecessary wars.

Well, McCain is gone, and, so far, no other voice has replaced his as the major war-demanding advocate in Washington. One may yet arise, of course, on the issue of Idlib. But the fact remains – as it did when McCain was alive — that no American life or interest has been killed or damaged in Syria since the war began there in 2011, save for the losses caused by the unwise decisions to go there by several American journalists and NGO workers, and the national government’s mindless decision to uselessly risk of the lives of U.S. Marines and soldiers.

Overall, the destiny of Idlib, its combatants, and its people are a matter of supreme indifference to Americans, who will get along just fine no matter what happens Syria. If those war-mongers who attended McCain’s funeral service, and those who follow and support them, are concerned about Idlib, let them go there and participate in the fight. At the least, each should send a few million dollars of their spare and probably ill-gotten change to the inhabitants. Let them for once, put their own lives and money at risk, and leave the rest of the country alone.

Without McCain, the citizenry now has a chance to see the republic gradually return to sanity by becoming involved in wars only if its survival is at stake. Such wars will be few and far between, unless we are forced by the Democrats to fight a civil war here at home to preserve the republic they seek to destroy. No post-McCain military interventionist has the insulation from criticism that McCain had from being a former POW and from never letting anyone forget it. With his demise, perhaps President Trump, Senator Paul, and their lieutenants will be able to reteach the citizenry the worth and constitutional-appropriateness of an America First foreign policy in terms of preserving the lives, limbs, and minds of our soldier-children; accruing financial savings that fuel domestic infrastructure reconstruction and debt reduction, the full restoration of the civil liberties savaged by the national government since 9/11, and the reliable application in full of the 1^st, 2^nd, and 4^th Amendments for all citizens.

So often in life goodbyes are bittersweet, but today it seems there are particular goodbyes that are far more sweet than bitter.

–THE MAN:

–HIS LEGACY:

Sources:

McCain photo: https://www.ktts.com/news/local-news/missouri-leaders-share-reactions-to-john-mccain-passing

Arlington National Cemetery photo: https://people.howstuffworks.com/culture-traditions/national-traditions/arlington-national-cemetery-is-running-out-space.htm

What can one say about the U.S. general officer who said the following after President Trump correctly, and at long last, removed former CIA Director John Brennan’s security clearances.

“Few Americans have done more to protect this country than John. He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question, except by those who don’t know him. Therefore, I would consider it an honor if you would revoke my security clearance as well, so I can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency.”

Those words were spoken last week by dear, faux-noble Admiral William McRaven, a man who is identified in the media as the architect and leader of the “raid that killed bin Laden.” Funny, I would have thought the raid’s leader was the officer who commanded the attack team on the ground in Abbottabad – you know, where the danger was — not the officer who was heavily guarded by friendly forces in whatever headquarters he safely sat, drinking coffee, while the operation occurred.

Nonetheless, dear, self-promoting Admiral McRaven ought to be taken at his word, and the president should terminate his clearances. In fact, why should any retried U.S. general officer retain his or her clearances? The president should take away the clearances from all of them.

Indeed, why would any U.S. administration want the advice of any of America’s retired general officers, a band of arms-manufacturing company directors who share one central and shameful trait with all post-1945 generals; namely, not one of them has won a war in which America was involved. And, oddly, these men-of-constant-defeat are treated by the citizenry as demigods, even though they have willingly got our soldier-children killed and maimed in all the unnecessary wars they knowingly lost in the past seven decades. The public’s misplaced trust and respect ought to stop immediately, and heckling ought to commence whenever one of these wretched losers begins to speak.

Given this hard but true fact, one must ask the question: “Why has no U.S. general officer ever criticized a president who ordered them to war with no intention of winning it?” Are these general officers simply lovers of losing, is all their talk about caring for the lives of their men just hype, or have McRaven and the rest of his brother non-winners simply decided to speak-up now because Trump will knock them off their dependable, post-retirement corporate gravy trains if he continues to keep us out of new wars and seeks to limit our exposure to being drawn into wars for others. I believe it is the latter.

As for Brennan, no one will be able to find a professional and successful U.S. intelligence officer who would utter — without a gun to his head — the words: “Few Americans have done more to protect this country than John. He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question.” Brennan, dear unperceptive – or is it deceitful? — Admiral McRaven, is a duplicitous ass, whose career was made by lies and back-stabbing, kissing the butt of every intelligence officer, general, or politician for whom he worked, abusing his subordinates, and by his eager willingness to ensure that their interests and wallets, and never the republic’s security interests, always came first.

Indeed, dear, self-righteous Admiral McRaven, you would not have had to risk the lives of your men at Abbottabad in 2011 to kill bin Laden – if, in fact, you were concerned about their survival – if Brennan had not made sure he protected Saudi Arabia’s interests by siding with George Tenet, Bill Clinton, and Richard Clarke to prevent the United States from trying to kill bin Laden on any of the ten occasions, in 1997-1998, that were afforded them by the CIA officers risking their lives on the ground in South Asia.

I wonder, dear, showboating Admiral McRaven, if there is anything worse than a man like Brennan – who kept bin Laden alive, covered-up for Hillary’s murder of Americans in Benghazi, and helped Obama illegally fund the Iranian mullahs? If there is, it can only be you and so many of your war-losing band of brothers, men and women who always have their eyes on the main chance – riches from the arms-makers in retirement.

And, by the way, Admiral McRaven, I do know Brennan, and he is a lying, anti-American cur. And in my book, Admiral, so are you.

Last week, the Democrats and the media had their pitchforks, torches, and nooses out for FOX’s Laura Ingraham after she told the absolute truth; namely, most Americans dislike the republic-killing demographic changes that have and are being tyrannically forced on them by the bipartisan governing elite.

In other words, America’s Bolsheviks are now after Ms. Ingraham for telling the truth. This is, of course, the modus operandi always seen among the zombies, intellectuals, racists, murderers, and other half-baked people who refuse to think for themselves and have followed Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Hillary Clinton. Then, there also is that peculiar species of moron that follows the utterly nonsensical claim of Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and their ilk of mentally deranged diversity/multiculturalism mongers that “diversity makes us stronger”. Only a fool or a liar could say such a thing with a straight face, and only an idiot could think it true.

The fact is that Ms. Ingraham spoke the unquestionable truth and so it was unrecognizable to the mainstream media, huge numbers of millennials — thanks to their extortionate and useless educations — and, again, to the average Democrat, all of whom are dependably below average but more than adequate parrots.

The irrefutable fact is that the Democrats and most of the Republicans have presided over a hostile foreign invasion of the United States. They facilitated the invasion because it promised the former an endless supply of loyal ignoramuses for voters, and assured the latter an endless source of cheap labor. Both parties, of course, understood but chose to ignore the fact that the Founders had a built a republic that could only be maintained by a largely homogeneous population and one that was religiously inclined toward Protestant Christianity.

The Founders also believed that the foreigner who did not precisely fit the foregoing model could, albeit regrettably, be admitted — there was a lot of land to fill up, after all — but that they must be dispersed among the native population and educated in schools that taught them the country’s history, the English language, and their civil responsibilities. The Founders also warned against allowing immigrants to settle in groups, thereby forming closed communities that would not assimilate and would become hostile toward those that gave them a chance live in America. As always, the Founders were exactly correct. Our major cities now host such angry and armed anti-American enclaves.

How do we begin to end this decades long and entirely politician-created demographic shift toward awarding the United States the always-to-be resisted status as a Third World shithole? Well, here are a couple of sure-fire methods:

–1.) Voters must dismiss, with absolute finality, all politicians with plans to continue undermining the republic by implementing the policies attendant to the anti-American theories of diversity and multiculturalism. Such a rejection would have nothing to do with ethnicity, race, religion, or gender. It would be done because the concepts themselves are unimaginably stupid, elitist, and destructive. They were and are designed by Ivy League professors to help the Democrats destroy the American republic. Nothing, repeat, nothing, can restore our society’s cohesiveness, and begin to strengthen our gradually splintering Union, so long as additional immigrants and illegal aliens are admitted who do not intend to assimilate, and who the Democrats mean to be their party’s slave-voters and whom the Republicans want as cheap-laborers.

–2.) We must establish a requirement for a moderate English-speaking capability for anyone applying for permanent entry into the United States; those with the highest such capability should be placed at the head of the applicant line; and no immigrant should be made a naturalized citizen without passing a test that shows an English-language competence sufficient to use the language in all everyday activities conducted outside the home, especially in the workplace

This action would have the bonus of saving enormous amounts of educational funds by gradually returning  to the commonsense situation in which instruction in all schools is conducted only in English — save for the study of foreign languages — thereby ending the multi-lingual instruction that the Democrats have designed to prevent assimilation, keep everyday dealings between native-born Americans and immigrants difficult at best, and to maintain the party’s new slave plantations of frightened immigrants who are unable to understand and adapt to their new surroundings because they do not speak competent English. The Democrats and Republicans deliberately have made the republic a modern Babel from which they exploit immigrants for votes and labor, as well as make them the enemies of the native born. Mandatory English-for-all would level the economic, academic, political, and social playing fields for all legal Americans, and would return the republic to a rough linguistic homogeneity which is, of course, an important key to its survival and cultural renewal. 

–3.) We must also accept the fact that the U.S. Constitution’s provisions pertain only to U.S. citizens, and is meant solely to protect them, their liberty, and their republic. In other words, the Constitution cannot sanely be construed as applying and giving rights to any foreigner living outside sovereign U.S. territory, or of giving Americans the duty to feed, clothe, protect, fund, nurse-to-health, educate, rescue, or host any foreigners who claim such help as his right. Such actions are rightfully the work of religions, charities, rich Tech Giants (fat chance), but never that of the national government. The Constitution, in other words, belongs solely to Americans, and they and their elected representatives can use it in any manner that suits them and their republic’s needs, when it comes to devising policies dealing with foreigners located in foreign lands. The rest of the world’s views on the matter amount to irrelevant nattering to be listened to politely, and then entirely ignored.

Armed with this fact, U.S. citizens and their elected representatives also should ignore any federal judge who decides issues before him in a manner that is based on a belief that anything in the Constitution covers and protects non-U.S.-citizen foreigners living outside the United States.

If, for example, the citizenry wants to completely ban Muslim immigration for the next decade — after having grown weary of Muslims and their genital mutilation of young women, camps for training young children to shoot-up schools, wife beating, creating of armed enclaves in major cities, honor killings, acid throwing, armed attacks, and penchant for protecting Muslim murderers while they are planning to massacre non-Muslims — there is nothing in the Constitution that prevents such a ban on Muslim immigration. A judge who finds that there is, is an ass who was educated in fake law schools meant to destroy, Justice Ginsberg-like, the U.S. Constitution.

Likewise, there is nothing in the Constitution that can be construed so as to prevent Americans from deciding that would-be immigrants will not be admitted if they are diseased, mentally deranged, or illiterate. Americans also are not compelled by the Constitution to admit people who emanate from societies that work only because of systematic corruption, tribalism, misogyny, socialism, crime, or tyranny.  None of these traits stop at the border, and all would be imported by their carriers into the republic, where they would be injected into and then further corrupt its politics.

The Constitution authorizes only Americans to decide who is or is not welcome in their country. Such a decision belongs to a sovereign people and that, by definition, means that what U.S. actions the dung hill-dwelling leaders of the UN, the EU, and the Third World, as well as that damned Marxist Pope and the media, demand regarding the republic’s immigration policies do matter not a whit to the citizenry. In a short tweet, they all should be told to go pound sand.

Finally, while the greedy Republicans are complicit in this immigration disaster, the responsibility for prolonging, broadening, and sharpening its negative and destabilizing impact lies solely with the Democrats. In August, 1894, Theodore Roosevelt wrote that,

“No government that cannot command the respectful support of the best thinkers is in an entirely sound condition; but it is well to keep in mind the remark of Frederick the Great, that if he wished to punish a province, he would allow it to be governed by the philosophers. It is a great misfortune for the country when the practical politician and the doctrinaire have no point in common, but the misfortune is, if anything, greatest for the doctrinaire.” (1)

If here today, President Roosevelt would denounce the fact that his fellow citizens had permitted themselves to be governed by the Democrats’ crackpot philosophers since  Lyndon Johnson began his party’s war to destroy the middle class — black and white — and to build slave plantations of black voters bound to the party by the funds that the national government stole from black and white middle-class taxpayers and gave to those it trained to be dole-addicted. All of this was conducted under the leadership of Ivy League professors and the Democrats they educated, and they, too, have been at the helm of the diversity and multicultural doctrines that have made America the demographic nightmare it is today.

I have long held — and argued in this space — that the Democrats must be recognized as the party of the four S’s; that is, as the champions of slavery, secession, segregation, and socialism. Now they have won their fifth “S” by becoming the champions of making America a shit-hole via immigration.

So, today, the Democrats and their pet philosophers are slavers, secessionists, segregationists, socialists, and, shit-hole builders. If Roosevelt was correct, and in politics he usually was, they — those he called “doctrinaire” — will soon find a richly merited and, pray God, indictment-fueled misfortune catching up with them. Though rotting in prison until they die seems too good an end for them, I suppose you never get everything you want. 

And Roosevelt, by the way, surely would ask why his fellow citizens have tolerated the Democrats’ tyranny for so long without an appropriate and punishing response. “There must be sincere purpose to push forward and remedy wrong,” he wrote in June, 1918, “but there must be firm refusal to submit to the leadership of the criminal fringe or the lunatic fringe.” (2)  That refusal, Roosevelt could be reassured, will definitely be felt by the Democratic criminals and lunatics if their indictments do not soon flow forth.

Endnote:

–1.) https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1894/08/the-college-graduate-and-public-life/304483/

–2.) Quoted in Daniel Ruddy. Theodore the Great. Conservative Crusader. Washington, DC: Regenery History, 2016, p. xiv

I have been on a two-week hiatus courtesy of Godaddy’s decision to kill my blog because, they claim, I was “spamming and abusive”. In the e-mail announcing the blog’s demise, Godaddy added that they did not want to hear from me because their diktat could not be questioned by me or anyone else.

Now, those who have read my work well know that my computer skills are marginal. I generally break the key used to open a can of spam, and so electronically spamming people is, for me, a complete impossibility. As to abuse, the Lords of Godaddy seem to have have missed the vile, threatening, and half-baked messages sent to me by hundreds of semi-literates via twitter and as comments to my last three blogs. I answered many of the blog comments with disdain and sarcasm, all of which were mild in comparison to the incoming.

Still, the destruction of my blog site by what seem to be aspiring communists at Godaddy has been useful in helping me to understand – first-hand – the power of such tech giants to destroy the constitutional rights of targeted individuals who annoy them and their Democratic partners — or is it puppets? It also provided an invaluable insight into what the tech world views as the proper role for all non-elite Americans in the world they are building and mistakenly think they will survive to see.

Godaddy’s actions came after my last three blogs. In the first, I argued – using the impeccable authority, on this point, of John Milton, Algernon Sydney, John Dickinson, and Thomas Jefferson — that if Trump cannot/will not enforce the law and arrest, try, incarcerate, and, if the law allows, execute those who believe and act as if they are above it, American citizens will have to do their duty by using their weapons to snuff out the authors of tyranny; namely, those who neither enforce or obey the law and those who support them. This seems to have worried many of my critics, not to mention the Godaddy commies-in-waiting, and left them confused as to whose was – and is – calling for civil war.

On that score, I stand not as an inciter, but rather as the incited and as a responder to the clear threats of civil war that are rampant among those in the Democratic Party; namely, the anti-free-speech mainstream media; the academy; the financial and technology industries; the much-aggrieved and always badly educated Democratic terrorists in Antifa, BAM, MS-13, and BLM; the unable-to-teach, teachers’ unions; the minority groups, feminists, felonious illegal aliens, and sexual deviants who demand legal preference; and the society-murdering advocates of diversity and multiculturalism. Those are the sources that are solely responsible for the civil war that is nearing.  That they are ignorant, or feign ignorance, of that fact will add to their surprise if the time for Rob Reiner’s war comes and so many of them find themselves reaping the armed whirlwind they and ol’ Rob have sown.

In the second blog, I made reference to the revelatory nature of the now ongoing events in South Africa, where the government – made up of Mandela’s naturally terrorist spawn – is either directing or turning a blind eye to a campaign by black thugs to kill white, usually Christian South African farmers. The black murderers want to permanently evict the white farmers from the land they own, and, of course, to simultaneously enjoy a merry bit of blood sport. Apparently not satisfied with having destroyed the South African economy, Mandela’s murderous heirs are now actively allowing the murder of the farmers on which all of the country depends on for food. Underlying the planned and casual nature of the regime’s murder-condoning policy, was the silence of Barack Obama on the issue. On the day before I wrote, Obama was in South Africa giving a narcissistic, two-hour speech to praise the communist Mandela and to then talk endlessly about himself, how he feels, what he thinks, what people pain him, and what he plans to do. He mentioned not one word about his hosts’ campaign of murder against white farmers, which was not unusual as he always has cared about murders only if the murdered were blacks or emanated from one of his party’s slave plantations. In the piece, I also noted that it is interesting that the only world leader who is seeking to aid the white South African farmers is President Putin by allowing them to emigrate to Russia and, on arrival, receive substantial and free homesteads that they can work to make a living. I also gave a well done to Putin, and I give it again here, and give it enthusiastically.

The third essay dealt with the frenzy about Russia’s supposed meddling in U.S. elections that is being whipped up by the Democrats, the Neocons, and their media shills. Such meddling by Moscow is a nothing-new event that has been occurring since Lenin ordered the massacre of the Czar and his family in an Ekaterinburg basement. I noted in the piece that there is no reason to believe anything that comes out of the FBI or the CIA on this issue as, after two years of investigation (presumably grounded on the threat the FBI and CIA claimed to exist), Mueller and his 17 lying Democrats have not found any perpetrators of the meddling whose guilt or innocence can be decided in a court of law. Perhaps sensing that the citizenry was not buying their unsubstantiated claims, the Intelligence Community’s Grandees arranged to have Facebook race to capitol hill and report that the nasty Russian meddlers had placed 32 pages of diabolical material on their platform that had to be removed from the Facebook system. Now, why would anyone with a lick of commonsense believe anything that a Facebook employee had to say about anything? Facebook is an organization that would have made Joe Stalin drool, stealing personal data from its clients and selling it to buyers – private- and public-sector – who will use it to manipulate or track or frame those clients. But like all of the tech giants, Facebook is all about violating the Bill of Rights and eventually destroying the republican system it is mean to protect.

In the same essay, I also added that it seemed ridiculous to worry about Russian meddling in U.S. elections, when the governing elite condones and profits from their not-so-secret status as the paid assets of Jewish-American leaders and organizations and Israel, the former’s country of first allegiance. Indeed, it would only take Mueller and his band of Hillary-acolytes two days to discover that three-quarters and probably more of the U.S. Congress, and an untold number of senior U.S. civil servants and general officers are the willing and paid agents of a foreign power named Israel. Any national discussion of the issue of prolonged and devastating foreign intervention in U.S. politics, elections, and media can only start in one place, and that is in Israel. By-the bye, is it not odd that President Trump’s attackers are demanding that he provide the specific content of his one-on-one discussions with President Putin – which are the result of a legal meeting of the U.S. and Russian presidents, and which was the duty of both – but not once in my lifetime has anyone asked for the specific content of the private, unsupervised, and so illegal one-on-one discussions that have occurred in past decades between the Israeli prime minister of the day and U.S. politicians, civil servants, and opinion-shapers, cretins such as Schumer, Nadler, Joe Lieberman, Bill Kristol, John Bolton, Wolfowitz, Graham, McCain, Behner, Feinstein (when not busy selling-out America to China), Wolf Blitzer, Rahm Emanuel, and, literally, many hundreds of others. Why the secrecy? Why the lack of interest in finding what game is afoot? Well, because every time an Israeli prime minister shows up in the United States it signals the start of the treason season.

I have nattered on here longer than I intended. To sum up, I found my unexpected hiatus to be useful in learning that the tech giant Godaddy – like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter – fully condones and, indeed, advocates and is working for:

–1.) The curtailment and eventual abolition of the U.S. Bill of Rights, or at least, at this stage, the 1^st, 2^nd, and 4^th amendments. That is, tyrannical rule over an enslaved U.S. citizenry is not only okay with, but is preferred by Godaddy.

–2.) Godaddy is delighted with the on-going murder of white Christian South African farmers by black, Antifa-like South African thugs and the Mandela-ized South African regime, and does not want to slow down the murder-spree there by allowing Americans to learn about its existence. Maybe the tech giants could help to hunt down the white South African farmers just as some of them are helping Beijing to eradicate Chinese political dissidents and Chinese Christians and Muslims, – usually by killing them and then removing and selling their organs. Obama might also send some of his Antifa thugs there to be trained by the black South African murderers of white farmers.

–3.) Godaddy’s commissars are comfortable with the plan for war with Russia that is now being stirred up largely by the lies of the Tech giants, the Neocons, Muellers’ show trials, much of the Congress, members of the CIA and most of the FBI, and the anti-Trump mainstream media. They also seem satisfied with EU leaders who are stoking the threat of war with Russia so that the nearly-moribund NATO alliance again appears necessary, which means, in turn, that U.S. taxpayers will continue to be exploited to pay for Europe’s defense.

–4.) Godaddy has no concerns about the disloyal and subversive activities of Jewish-American leaders/organizations and Israeli leaders and their intervention in U.S. elections. They also support that gang’s purchase of U.S. politicians and civil servants to ensure the U.S. taxpayer gets bilked for billions in annual aid to Israel, and so that those taxpayers’ children always can be used as cannon fodder in wars that are in Israel’s, not America’s, interests.

Maybe I should pay Godaddy a fee for so thoroughly teaching me these deeply held anti-Americans realities about itself during my summer hiatus? Nah, learning  firsthand that Godaddy is led, managed, and censored by pro-tyranny, leftist shitbirds only confirmed what I had suspected, and what was reaffirmed yesterday with the tech giants’ banning of Alec Jones.

Jones has three times more subscribers than CNN has daily viewers. Ten million people a day in America and around the world watch one or more parts of Jones’s programming. Jones was banned for “hate speech”, which is a brain-dead and meant-to-censor concept that is championed only by the Tech gangsters, fools of Reiner’s ilk, disloyal Israel-Firsters, and other enemies of the republic and free speech, all of whom specialize in the type of speech they are accusing Jones of using. The most important takeaway from Jones’s banning is that the four bastards who head the four tech giants have decided that 70 million weekly American and international viewers cannot watch — or listen to — anything that annoys them; the Democrats, pedophiles, and other sexual deviants; the feminists, the Hollywood vermin, and the abortionists; or the communists, Democratic Party-funded terrorists, or any of the other of the human garbage that today occupies the political left and does not know how to use in-door plumbing.

In banning Jones, those on the left again have proven that they are the ones who are seeking to provoke a civil war. My own hunch is that if their provocations work, they will enjoy the reality of war with considerably less gusto than they did while so loudly calling for and provoking it.

“The expropriation of land without compensation is envisaged as one of the measures that we will use to accelerate redistribution of land to black South Africans.”

President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, 21 February 2018 (1)

In world that is fast resolving itself into a sharp confrontation between globalism, and the military tyranny at its core, and a rising tide of nationalism, it is unusual to see a man do the right thing, even when he knows the rest of the world will ignore or revile him for it. But in one quick and generous action, President Putin and Russia appear prepared to do more to protect Christians than any Western leader has done in the past half-century. At the same time, Putin’s plan cannot but help but aid Russia’s agricultural sector.

Putin and his government have offered free homesteads of significant size, for farming or husbandry, to 15,000 white, Christian South African farmers and their families whose lives, culture, wealth, and children are now being murdered by blacks with the unofficial approval of the government of barbarians that now rules South Africa. Putin and Russia will receive no praise from the Marxist Pope of Rome, the irrelevant Archbishop of Canterbury, or any other effete Christian chieftain, nor from any anti-white/anti-Christian European or American political leader.

Indeed, the scourge of the United States, and the world’s racist-in-chief, Barack Obama spoke in South Africa this week and never mentioned the plight of the soon-to-be-murdered Boer farmers and their families. In an enormously long speech, Obama turned night to day by describing the “successes” Mandela and his successors have scored, successes that amount to economic collapse and an open season for hunting white humans. As always, Obama has no trouble whatsoever with the murdering of whites. In gratitude for his silence on the issue, perhaps the rotten Mandela-spawn that now govern South Africa took Obama on a hunt for some white Boers during his visit.

This execrable, Obama-led class of leaders were betting that the white South African farmers would surrender and go to their and their children’s death in a cowardly silence, and that no world leader would focus on the racist eradication of whites that is being condoned by the black butchers who rule South Africa. They won their bet on Western leaders; save for Putin, not one major world leader has tried to focus attention on the blacks-led, government-acquiesced-in murder crusade against white South African farmers. But the Boer farmers and their families will never surrender and die in silence and cowardice, ask the British queen about her forebearers’ prolonged, agonizing, well-merited, and highly lethal experience with Boer farmers.

Since the unfortunate and deadly implementation of the Thatcher-Reagan policy of “constructive engagement” toward South Africa — which always was a plan that would end in the slow-track extermination of whites — and the installment of the talentless government of the ex-terrorist Nelson Mandela, South Africa, under black rule, has declined from being the reliable economic powerhouse of the African continent to being just one more African basket case where poverty grows, economies free fall, anti-white racism spreads, and foreign aid becomes the fuel of domestic tyranny, a fuel that is today powering the murderous racism of South Africa’s ruling blacks

The Pope, EU leaders, multiple U.S. administrations — including, to date, Trump’s –and most of the world’s Christian leaders have not and will not act to try to stop the Black South Africans’ ongoing massacre of white South African farmers. Well, a pox on them, and may they all rot slowly and painfully in hell. Better yet, may they one day be ruled, persecuted, and terminated by black South Africans, whose constitution U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg considers sublime and able to provide governing principles that are far better than the American Constitution. Ginsburg said she particularly likes the human-rights provisions of the South African constitution, you know, those provisions that are now being applied to murder white South African farmers.

Obama and Ginsburg, as always, are champions of globalism, tyranny, and the full destruction of the Western tradition, and, as always, they seek to disguise that fact with endless oral flatulence about human rights, which for them, is the right of non-obedient human beings to be killed by their government or, even better, a world government.

All told, Mr. Putin is the only world leader that has shown the moral courage to at least try to do something for the white South African farmers, and — if it works — that something will be fine because it will benefit Russia, the Boers, and Russian agriculture. Australia, New Zealand, and the United States would do well to follow Putin’s example. (NB: Forget Canada, though, under Trudeau it will be rooting for the black murderers.)

Happily, it will also leave the Boer’s black South African murderers and their governmental abettors in quite a bad fix, as white farmers grow about two-thirds of all the crops in South Africa, an abundance that now suffices domestically and allows exports to several other, often ill-fed African nations. Following is what these murderous morons are intent on wiping out.

South Africa’s 35,000 remaining commercial farmers (down from 60,000 in 1996) are vital to the food security of 54-million South Africans (up from 40-million in 1995). They also contribute 3.9% of the country’s gross domestic product, employ more than 650,000 mostly unskilled people and help to boost exports and hold down the current account deficit. They generally have good relationships with their workers and don’t pay less than the statutory minimum wage. Many have also done all they can to mentor new black farmers and generally help with the process of land reform. (2)

What’s that story about the great danger that lies in killing the goose that lays the golden egg? Guess its either not a popular story in South Africa, or maybe its just that the witless Mandela-ites killed and ate ye olde goose long ago.

Endnotes

1. https://www.sovereignman.com/trends/south-africas-brand-new-president-wants-to-confiscate-land-from-white-farmers-22993/ and http://www.businessinsider.com/south-africa-cyril-ramaphosa-wants-to-confiscate-white-farmers-land-2018-2
2. Quoted at “Ethnic hatred with an SA twist: Evil truths about farm murders — Ed Herbst” (https://www.biznews.com/africa/2017/12/27/ethnic-hatred-sa-farm-murders-herbst/)

The answer to this piece’s questioning title is a simple “nothing.” That title should be, rather, making all commonsensical Americans shriek with laughter.

Why should any American worry about the unending, manic claims that Russia interfered in the 2016 election? This story, after all, has been made up and perpetuated by aspiring traitors like Clapper, Hayden, Tapper, Acosta, Hillary Clinton, Comey, John Podesta, Maddow, McCabe, Brennan, Page, Strzok, Wray, the reporting staffs of the Washington Post and the New York Times, the Council on Foreign Relations, and most of all, by the foreign-born Obama. To believe this crew’s statements about anything at all is to believe that John McCain and Lindsay Graham can open their mouths without lying us into yet another interventionist war.

These are the same persons, you will recall, who lied about not collecting electronic intelligence on all U.S. citizens; who deliberately undermined America by selling 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia, and who then divvied up $150 million in bribes; who used the IRS to persecute conservative organizations; who made up from whole cloth the repeated claim that the Afghan military could defend its country without U.S. troops; who, with premeditation, killed Mr. LaVoy Finicum as part of the USG’s lawless attempt to eradicate the Bundy family, their friends and supporters, and the independent spirit of American ranchers; who have facilitated the invasion of the United States by unwanted, unneeded, illiterate, and criminal immigrants who may yet kill the republic; who have so far — under FBI guidance — effectively built a lying narrative about a single-shooter in the Las Vegas shooting, an attack that was actually conducted by Democratic Party-related operatives and killed and wounded hundreds of Americans; and who have covered-up their certain knowledge that Obama always was patently disqualified to constitutionally serve as president.

In the face of what Jefferson surely would call a “long train” of perfidy, treason, obsessive avarice, and murder by the national government, one must ask why would any commonsensical American fail to see that the Russian-meddling narrative is transparently an attempt by Obama leftovers and the seething, quite mad Neocons to push the United States into a new Cold War war Russia, one that would lead to a hot war, as well as a means of keeping themselves out of the slammer and off the gallows.

Indeed, there is not a loyal American citizen who has a single credible reason to believe any intelligence-based claims made by the Obama administration, or the Obama leftovers in Trump’s administration, about Russian interference in the 2016 election. The citizenry’s only fair-minded conclusion is that Obama ordered his intelligence and military lieutenants to stand down on responding to “Russian hacking” in summer, 2016, because no such hacking occurred. Certainly, the two indictments of Russians — written by Obama acolytes led by Rosenstein, Strzok, and old-man, disgrace-to-the-Marines Mueller and his merry band of Trump-hating attorneys — are clearly dreamed-up travesties that would disgrace a first-year law-school student and get him the boot therefrom.

The foregoing is not to say there isn’t foreign meddling in our national elections, but the word that should be used to describe it is “Israeli,” not “Russian.” Now, is it not remarkable that there is never any person of public significance who is willing to discuss the obvious fact that Israel has conducted a half-century campaign not only to meddle in but to ultimately control U.S. national elections?

How to account for this failure to recognize, publicly condemn, attack, and terminate this meddling and its sponsors? What is one to make for, example, of the resolute silence of the 535 members of the Senate and House of Representatives on the crying need to investigate Israel’s suborning of the Congress, as well as senior and juniors officials in Department of Defense, DOJ, the CIA, and the FBI.

What one must make of it, of course, is obvious. It seems certain that most of the Congress, and the senior levels of DoD, DoJ, FBI, the State Department, and CIA, receive regular checks or other valuable perks — while serving and in retirement — that are funneled from wealthy Jewish-Americans and their organizations, through plausible cutouts, to ensure their continued behind-the-scenes support for Israel; to keep them from seeking an investigation of the very public and widespread Israeli perfidy; and to make sure all U.S. national election results serve Israel’s interests before America’s.

There may be a few members of the Congress and the other institutions mentioned who might not be on the take from Israel. Senator Paul and some members of the Freedom Caucus perhaps, but that conclusion is based on nothing more than hoping against hope. It would hardly be surprising to find that all 535 members of Congress are floating about sipping frozen daiquiris in the cesspool of corruption, collusion, and foreign intervention that has been built and kept filled by Jewish-Americans and Israel. And I wonder, also, how many of those 535, as well as members of DoJ, DoD, CIA, and FBI, have been photographed by the Mossad frolicking sexually with children on Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile island resort? Surely, if any on-the-take U.S. official ever wavers in his bribe-funded, unquestioning allegiance to Israel, his or her knowledge that the Mossad has glorious Kodachrome photos and videos of them raping, killing, and otherwise molesting children that will force them back on the pro-Israel straight and narrow.

And, in passing, it also must be assumed that Israel and wealthy Jewish-Americans and their organizations are assisting the long-ago proven efforts of George Soros to destroy the Western tradition, manipulate U.S. elections, and to tear American society apart. Why assume this? Well, what other well-known, flamboyant, easily tracked, pro-Nazi, pro-holocaust, enemy-of-Israel, Jew killer has not been found and tried. or just simply murdered by the Israeli authorities? The first answer: None to date, except Soros. The second answer: Soros — not to mention Epstein — is a prized Israeli asset.

It is far past time to terminate the Democratic/Neocon “Russian-hacking” melodrama and begin to arrest the hundreds of politicians, bureaucrats, and media figures who manufactured it, flogged it ad infinitum, and so merit trial and incarceration. This would benefit and raise the spirit of all people fit to be called Americans. It also would create an opportunity for those citizens to insist that it is past time to investigate and eradicate the intervention in American affairs of Israel, prominent Jewish-Americans, and their host of well-paid human assets in the Congress, the federal bureaucracy, and the media.

Now there is a target that has long proven itself to be more than worthy of merciless annihilation.

As this week’s end, it seems likely that it is quite near time for killing those involved in the multiple and clearly delineated attempts to stage a coup d’état against the legitimately elected Trump government and thereby kill our republic.

• The week saw the alternative media document nearly 300 incidents of violence against loyal U.S. citizens that have been perpetrated by Democrats and the domestic terrorists that the party and its financial supporters keep on their payrolls. The Americans they are abusing and attacking — even those using concealed carry — have so far held their fire and sucked up the pain, trying to give Trump time to forever eliminate their violent tormentors. The well-armed patriot’s patience does not, and must not, last forever.
• The week saw FBI agent Strzok brazenly lie to the Congress, show his own detestation for everyday Americans — it’s their smell, he says — and display facial and other physical quirks that appeared very reminiscent of a demented beaver, a drug addict, or a loyal Democrat.
• The week saw that the FBI, in the person of Strzok, had refused to investigate a foreign address to which 30,000 e-mails from Hillary Clinton’s unsecured server were delivered. It was made clear that foreign address was not Russian, which surely means that the address was that of the Beijing tyrants who have paid the Democrats to surrender to China U.S. manufacturing industries, intellectual property, and much of its technical military prowess.
• The week saw Strzok describe the sacred FBI practice of briefing the leaders of any U.S. presidential campaign that is threatened by foreign influence/interference. The practice was ignored regarding Trump’s campaign, while the FBI — led by Strzok — assisted the British intelligence service’s (MI6) effort to try to ruin the campaign and then the Trump presidency.
• The week saw, on Friday the 13th, Special Counsel Mueller and his Democratic-apparatchik lawyers indict 12 supposed Russian intelligence officers with a laughable amount of evidence pertaining to their purported involvement in the 2016 election. Mueller’s action is a clear and undeniable effort to ruin President Trump’s coming meeting with Putin. It also ensures the continuation of the drive toward war with Russia that Obama and the EU started in 2013 with their direct and multi-pronged intervention in Ukrainian politics and their subsequent overthrow of the country’s pro-Russian government.
• It is worth noting that Mueller has zero chance of ever getting the Russian GRU officers into court, and that the FBI’s files — as well as those of other components of the intelligence community — are packed with the names of GRU officers. This reality leaves open the likelihood that Mueller’s pro-Hillary posse made up the list by randomly picking names, just as they did with the last list of indicted Russians.
• The week saw FBI’s Strzok make it clear under oath that the so-called “Trump Dossier” was available in the FBI and the Department of Justice in multiple copies, each with differing content. He described, in other words, nothing less than an in-process movie script that showed work of the hands of many notoriously anti-Trump writers, each trying to outdo the other in their lying and treasonous intent.
• This week saw DoJ’s Rod Rosenstein request the country’s 93 U.S. Attorneys to select three “federal prosecutors” for his use in vetting Supreme Court-nominee Brett Cavanaugh. Clearly, Rosenstein intends to use the prosecutors to invent a “crime” — as he did with Mueller’s investigation — that can be used to delay or stop Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination, and ruin his reputation and career in either event.
• This week saw Strzok admit that he and his paramour used their personal communication devices for government business and that the FBI allowed them to decide which of the messages thereon dealt with official business and which dealt with their sexual adventures (Good God, let there be no videos of that greasy swamp fest.) This is precisely the same biased-for-Democrats discretion that Strzok and the FBI — including weasel-boys Comey and McCabe — allowed Hillary Clinton and her reptilian coterie, before affording them the opportunity to destroy the remainder by smashing computers and mobile phones.
• This week saw Strzok again demonstrate that the FBI is not corrupt, lawless, and deceitful only at the top, but from top to bottom. Strzok repeatedly emphasized the large number of his colleagues who were involved in the Clinton and Russian investigations, noted that they were of one mind with him, and how they were — as he said he is — honorable, truth-telling, and law-abiding. Since no whistle-blower of any consequence has ever come forward from the FBI’s rank-and-file to disclose and describe to Americans what clearly is the dark, anti-constitutional, and fascist heart of the FBI, it can only be concluded that the entire FBI is in need of rapid and merciless eradication.

Finally, this week saw a significant and quickening advance toward the moment when those millions of well-armed citizens who voted for Trump, and who have been abused or wounded by Democrats, their Antifa-thugs, and their thug-civil servants for exercising their franchise to elect Trump, cannot be, in good conscience, patient for much longer.

Fortunately, they have in hand a long and very precise list of the names and photographs of those who hate and threaten them, their families, their way-of-life, their liberty, their livelihoods and their republic. No self-respecting and determined-to-remain-independent citizenry can let themselves forever be held hostage by thug-civil-servants like Strzok, Comey, McCabe, Page, and Rosenstein; worshipers of tyranny, like the Democratic members of Congress, the Clintons, the FBI, and the Obamas; apparent traitors like Brennan, Hayden, and Clapper; all of the mainstream media; and the tens of thousands of government-admitted-and-protected, violent, criminal, and illegal immigrants.

American patriots have so far, praise God, been remarkably disciplined in not responding to tyranny and violence with violence. For now they must remain so, armed but steady. But the time for such patience is fast slipping away; indeed, that patience is quickly becoming an obviously rank and self-destructive foolishness. If Trump does not act soon to erase the above noted tyranny and tyrants, the armed citizenry must step in and eliminate them.

It is, of course, far better if Trump does so, and I pray and believe he will. That said, the sheer, nay, utter joy and satisfaction to be derived from beholding great piles of dead U.S.-citizen tyrants is not one that will be missed if Trump does not soon do the necessary to save the republic. But if he fails, the citizenry must act to ensure that Hillary’s predictive words are proven correct. “If Trump wins,” she apparently said, “we will all hang.”

As President Trump arrives in Europe, he is readying to encounter a continent in which most nation-states are ruled by parties and leaders who want no part of the West’s historic democratic and republican traditions. For the first time in post-1945 history, an American president has no credible reason to pay even lip-service to the now-clear nonsense that the United States and Europe are a community of democratic societies. Save for nationalist-led governments of Poland, Hungary, and perhaps Italy, the nation-state members of the EU have quietly become tyrannies.

The EU’s leaders and bureaucracies have defied voters from the Arctic Ocean to the tip of Sicily by promoting the invasion of the continent by African and Arab Muslims who hate Christianity — they share this sentiment with EU leaders and bureaucrats — and seek life on the dole; legal preferment for themselves and Islam; practice wide-ranging violence, including the grooming of young girls for individual- and gang-rape; and the legal subordination of native-born Europeans to their will and that of the tyrants who have giddily herded them into the continent.

In Great Britain — the home of many of the political, legal, and philosophical ideas that helped shape the brilliance of America’s Founders — President Trump will meet Tory Prime Minister Theresa May. Mrs. May has locked-up native-born critics of her government’s policies on immigration and is in the midst of defying the majority of voters who approved a referendum that demanded the withdrawal of the UK from the EU’s Brussels-based tyranny. The president, in meeting Mrs. May, will not be meeting a fellow advocate and maintainer of liberty and freedom, but a monster intent on eliminating both in a land that historically was the cradle of American liberty.

Also in the UK, when President Trump meets with Queen Elizabeth II and Mrs. May, he ought to politely but forcefully tell them that the heretofore sacrosanct “U.S.-UK Special Relationship” will be terminated by the United States. The president can preface his remarks by noting that Americans fought and died to help maintain freedom in Europe in two world wars, and afterward paid the freight for Europe’s survival until the USSR collapsed. Since that collapse, the president can add, Britain and Europe have unilaterally disarmed and bred-out — via their media and education systems — any warrior-like character or inclinations in its population. In this light, the president can add, it is ludicrous to think the status quo should continue.

Mr. Trump should then drop the hammer by noting the last straw for the United States was Britain’s direct political, media, and intelligence intervention on the Democrats’ side in the 2016 presidential election, as well as in the Democrats’ post-election efforts to destroy his legitimate presidency. The evidence for this last point is ample, but a document published in Mr. Bill Still’s splendidly patriotic and reliably accurate and biting internet site “The Still Report” cinches the case. The document was written on 17 December 2016 by senior officials at GCHQ — the UK’s NSA — and apparently was approved by UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson. It shows that GCHQ had been collecting electronic communications at Trump’s campaign HQs and — with the May government’s approval — had agreed to a request by Obama and Susan Rice to continue that collection after Trump’s victory. I tried to move a copy of that document into this piece but failed. Mr. Sill’s short but important report, which includes the document, can be viewed here:

Finally, when President Trump deals with NATO, he should announce that he has set a date — say 31 December 2018 — for all NATO countries to meet or exceed their defense-spending commitments; only three of the 28 European/Canadian members are now doing so. The president should make it clear that all NATO members must meet the deadline; one country’s failure to meet the commitment sinks the organization. If the latter case occurs, Mr. Trump should explain that the United States will submit the required one-year notice to leave the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and will exit the organization on 31 December 2019.

Since the end of the Soviet Union, moreover, the NATO Alliance has been nothing less than an unconscionable burden on American taxpayers, though a monetary bonanza for U.S. arms makers and their bribed Congressional backers. Save for a few, the performance of NATO countries in Afghanistan and Iraq could only have been worse if they had not shown up for those wars. (NB: That said, the performance of the U.S. military in both places, 17 years on, has been nothing to crow about.)

More recently, the retired and serving general officers of most NATO militaries have been more than happy to sit by without challenging either their political leaders’ joint decision to allow a mass of Islamist fighters to enter the continent under the guise of refugees, or their decision to welcome home European mujahedin who have fought with the Islamic State, and then put those veterans on the dole and afford them preference in finding housing. The situation is such that the Europeans have neither the capability to defend themselves against the much over-hyped threat from Russia, nor the exquisitely clear threat their leaders deliberately have created for Europe’s citizens by welcoming a non-uniformed, murderous, and skilled Islamist army into their midst.

The United States is not and must not feel compelled to save Europe from its own endemic effeminacy, pacifism, multiculturalism, and moral cowardice. Now, Mr. Trump, is the time for the United States to begin to formally abandon NATO, and to resolve to let the European countries meet their well-merited and surely bloody fate all alone.

On 6 July 1775, the Continental Congress published a document, in the name of all Americans, that was called “The Causes and Necessity of Their Taking Up Arms.” The document announced an impasse between Britain and most of her North American colonies and explained that British North Americans would no longer tolerate British tyranny and were ready to take up arms against their oppressors. Written by John Dickinson and Thomas Jefferson, the document said, in part, that,

We are reduced to the alternative of chusing an unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers, or resistance by force. — The latter is our choice. — We have counted the cost of this contest, and find nothing so dreadful as voluntary slavery. — Honour, justice, and humanity forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them if we basely entail hereditary bondage upon them.

Our cause is just. Our union is perfect. Our internal resources are great, and, if necessary, foreign assistance is undoubtedly attainable. We gratefully acknowledge, as signal instances of the Divine favour towards us, that his Providence would not permit us to be called into this severe controversy until we were grown up to our present strength, had been previously exercised in warlike operation, and possessed of the means of defending ourselves. With hearts fortified with these animating reflections, we most solemnly, before God and the world, declare, that, exerting the utmost energy of those powers, which our beneficent Creator hath graciously bestowed upon us, the arms we have been compelled by our enemies to assume, we will, in defiance of every hazard, with unabating firmness and perseverance, employ for the preservation of our liberties; being with one mind resolved to die freemen rather than to live slaves. (1)

That document speaks to our day as much or more then it did to that of Dickinson and Jefferson.

As Independence Day, 2018, nears, I must admit that I have laid off domestic politics for a while and spent the time trying to understand what is going on in the republic. On the one hand, readers of this space will know that my perception has long been that America was striding toward civil war, and so a heavily armed citizenry was increasingly necessary. On the other hand, I have had an unattractive tendency to retreat from that reality and say no, that can never happen again in the United States. In essence, the reality of what I have seen and heard with my own eyes and ears since the 2016 election was continually questioned by a foolish old man who really did not want to admit with finality that he clearly saw what was approaching.

My cowardly timidity began to end with the shooting in Las Vegas which was explained away with such ludicrous statements that any foolish old man — even me — would be angered by it and at those elitists who thought the citizenry so stupid that it would accept the absurd, always changing stories as truth. My reaction was strengthened when the corrupt from top-to-bottom FBI sent a Comey-friendly, senior officer to keep a lid on the incident’s aftermath and to keep fueling the lie-laden information being dispensed to Americans about a one-man attack that killed and wounded hundreds of their fellow citizens. It is pretty clear that those people were shot by operatives who worked for or with the Democrats precisely because they believed them to have voted for President Trump.

My failings were shredded once for all when Representative Nancy Pelosi identified her — and her party’s and its members — support for the grotesque MS-13 barbarians as “children of God” and worthy of respect as human beings. This, of course, is not surprising as it is pretty clear that Democrats used MS-13 gangsters to murder the DNC’s IT employee Seth Rich. Pelosi’s statement was the end for me, and it left me wondering who the armed citizenry should begin deal with first, any tattoo-faced MS-13 butcher who is seen, or Pelosi and any Democrat who agrees with what she says on almost any topic. My conclusion was that the two groups and most of the media are really just one entity and so all merit the same steady and simultaneous attrition.

Also, helpful for me in making this judgment was the absolutely clear decision by the Democrats that they — and their predatory media — are no longer willing to abide by the election results. Their fantasy that the thief, murderer, and perhaps pedophile, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote and so should be president, speaks clearly to the fact that the Democrats not only do not understand the Constitution but that they want to destroy it and the governing system it inaugurated. They only understand and want permanent power and the riches they can steal therewith.

The simple truth is that no sane American would ever allow the Electoral College to be abolished. Even today, such a change in the Constitution would result in the nut-bag Democrats who run New York, California, Illinois, the states of New England, the Pacific Northwest, and a few mid-Atlantic states, together with the illiterate scum of the earth the Democrats have brought en masse into the republic to vote illegally and deepen its bankruptcy, would be a permanent national government. That government would rule arbitrarily to serve its members’ own overriding interests; namely, (a) permanent dictatorial power, (b) pedophilia and other extreme forms of sexual deviancy, and (c) the acquisition of enormous riches.

I have tried to leave the forgoing without nuance because there is no longer any point in using nuance — too often a tool used to be polite and dull truth’s edge — and even less to give any Democrat the benefit of the doubt. The last indulgence all Democrats should be granted is a short-time period — say until 1 August 2018 — to allow the Trump Administration to act against them as mercilessly as is permitted by using the full weight of the law against them and their transgressions. If this period passes, Americans are in the happy position of already being well-armed and in possession of an initial, partial list of miscreants who are in desperate need of attrition.

Where is that list? I have noted below four videos that are very helpful for the purposes of identification just mentioned. Each video discusses a list of 3,000-plus recently unsealed Federal indictments from a total that now exceeds 40,000. The unsealed indictments — less than a tenth of the total — are arranged in an easily searchable Excel spreadsheet. The data displayed is fascinating on its face, but focus most attention to the last column on the right in the second video, which consists of links that can be clicked open to allow the reader to review what surely appears to be a copy of the separate federal indictments that have been issued for each individual listed on the spreadsheet. (NB: The list includes men and women; Democrats; establishment Republicans; U.S. and foreign political, social, and religious leaders; celebrities; and rich private-sector business people in American and around the world.)  Several of the videos are hosted by a rough-and-ready, independent commentator whose language can be a bit salty, but his on-point commentary on the spreadsheet is an invaluable aid in assessing the list and showing the swamp’s massive, republic-killing population.

All told, the information presented in the videos is quite persuasive. Even more persuasive is the complete lack of interest in this matter so far shown by the mainstream media, the pro-Democrat online media, and even some of the so-called pro-Trump new media.

Take a look at the videos and judge for yourselves.

Endnote:

1. “A Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North-America, Now Met in Congress at Philadelphia, Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking Up Arms, 6 July 1775,” http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/arms.asp