Michael Scheuer | Non-Intervention

Two-plus years of the republic’s life have been stolen on the basis of criminal investigation that had no predicate crime to justify its operations. In other words, it operated on the basis of nothing, no basis whatsoever. Like Hitler, Mao, and Stalin, U.S. investigators targeted the man they want to destroy and then worked to frame a crime for his demise. They also enlisted multiple foreign powers to help them execute their framing project, an action both treasonous and gallows-worthy

But the rigged criminal investigation – like the Nazi Democrat’s rigged 2016 election – failed, and the target was exonerated. All Americans with commonsense know that in the American legal system the prosecutor must make a decision on the evidence he gathers. He either indicts or does not indict. In the latter case, the prosecutor traditionally simply says little or nothing so not to defame the non-indicted, and, therefore, innocent target.

In the present case, a supposedly splendid legal mind said he could not indict or exonerate the target, which is a lie on its face. He did not indict the target because there is no evidence to do so. Again, the rigged investigation failed.

This splendid prosecutor, however, deliberately created a path for the usual Nazi Gauleiters in Congress, along with their we-are-only-following-orders Nazi-Democrat operatives, the media, AIPAC and its disloyal ilk, and their political allies, like the junior Senator from Utah, to keep the republic- and Constitution-destroying hoax alive, so as to continue shattering the republic’s unity and endangering its existence.

All attentive Americans now know beyond doubt that – unless the current administration applies the laws with all permissible severity – there is no equality under the law for anyone who is not part of the National Socialist Democratic Party. It is clear, after all this time, that America’s Nazis, far more in number than anyone imagined, have wanted civil war all along and are now trying to ignite it.

So be it. These goose-stepping American Nazis, however, ought to recall that at times those who get what they want are, in the end, massively disappointed – and, in the best of times, they die. Imperial Japan, for example, got exactly what it wanted by destroying a portion of the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. Japan soon reaped a catastrophic, U.S. Marine Corps-driven whirlwind for getting what the Emperor wanted in Hawaii. Tough shit for Japan.

Today, there are many well-armed Americans who are angered and driven by a fierce hatred for Nazi-American actions meant to destroy the republic. When these patriots have had enough – a point surely near – the American Nazis, will get the civil war they have wanted and then, like Japan, they will die in agony, floating in an ocean of blood. Tough shit for the American Nazis.

Julian Assange’s post-arrest situation is being used by the bipartisan U.S. political elite and mainstream media to add additional chaos to the public square, this on the eve of the reckoning that the Constitution and President Trump and his team are soon going to deliver to those who have robbed the republic of two-plus years of its life.

Assange, of course had nothing to do with the so-called Russian interference in the 2016 election – the claim of which has been a hoax since the start – nor did he join the Russians to hack Podesta and DNC e-mails. The latter were stolen by that rare DNC official, Seth Rich, who balked at the corruption the DNC was using to ensure Hillary Clinton’s nomination. He apparently downloaded the e-mails onto a flash-drive – a process proven a senior NSA internet expert via his examination of the time it took to download the data – and then passed the e-mails to Assange’s people in a manner about which I am ignorant. Rich paid for this action with his life, probably murdered by DNC-paid, illegal MS-13 immigrants, and then left to die in a Washington hospital room as DNC Chair Donna Brazile reportedly patrolled the corridors until Rich breathed his last. Hopefully, Brazile will be among those who are administered a hefty dose of painful constitutional retribution, and has time to think about it before she is hung.

Assange, now under arrest in the UK and awaiting an extradition hearing, has moved the U.S. governing elite and its media whores to strive to use him to increase political and media chaos and to slow the advance of their approaching doom. The senators, congressmen, mainstream media, groveling-to-Disney FOX commentators, bound-for-prison folks like Brennan, Clapper, and Comey, puffed-up and always defeated and far-from-the-battlefield generals, and most of what passes for the legal profession are baying like rabid hounds for Assange to be punished severely “for endangering American lives”. The charges against Assange, as I understand them, deal with hacking not dealing with the Russians, but no matter, for these anti-American, anti-Trumpers any port in a storm will have to do when they are looking at an appointment with the noose.

The scaborous tide of hatred directed at Assange since his exit from the Ecuadorian embassy and his arrest by the British police has been stunning. As a former CIA officer, I have always damned those who published classified material, and living in northern Virginia, on the doorstep of the Washington Post, there has been such damning to do on a daily basis. Indeed, if Assange’s actions were assessed in comparison to those of such scum as Dana Priest, David Ignatius, Bob Woodward and his ferret-looking sidekick, and so many other Post writers, Assange would be let off the hook scot-free.

Assange’s crowd of howling critics would be far better served if they simply recognize and then attack the massive damage to U.S. national security that has been done by the Post’s large stable of anti-American employees. This is not to say that Assange should be excused from being tried for the laws he is accused of breaking – if there truly are any – but a conviction of Assange would do nothing but again underscore that there is no such thing as equality before the law in today’s United States. Assange, in other words, ought not to go to an American prison unless Priest, Ignatius, Woodward, and the ferret are on the same chain gang making little ones out of big ones.

Back to the Assange haters and attackers. These people have, almost to a person, used a phrase that says ‘Assange endangered American lives”. Now, that may or may not true, only time and a fair trial and an unbiased judge — the last two scarce commodities — can determine that issue. But the scourging of Assange is being used by the mainstream media, the Congress, and the lefty elite as a handy tool with which to prevent any public focus on the idea that Assange might not be alone in “endangering American lives”.

Agreeing that if there is non-invented, unComey-like proof against Assange, he should face a fair trial, what should be done about the following deliberate actions if the standard of “endangering American lives” applied to Assange is to prevail as grounds for criminality. If they are applied to Assange, the same grounds must be applied to every person who is found to be endangering American lives, and that leads to dealing with:

–Every America president since 1945 who has deliberately endangered American lives by starting undeclared, unconstitutional, and unnecessary interventionist wars that he did not intend to win.

–Every American general officer who has led troops in combat since 1945 and has endangered the lives of American troops while knowing that the commander-in-chief did not intend to win the unnecessary war he started.

–Every American President and the politicians serving in the Senate or Congress since 1945 who have endangered American lives and the country’s sovereignty and independence by supporting, signing, and adhering to international agreements alliances, and organizations that are funded by stealing from U.S. taxpayers –monies that ought to go to rebuild our infrastructure, feed malnourished kids, or simply to reduce taxes and debt – and which block the U.S. military from using every available weapon, including, landmines, napalm, cluster munitions, etc., to utterly defeat the republic’s genuine enemies.

–Every American politician serving in the Senate or Congress since 1945 who has endangered American lives by failing to complete the simple task of controlling our southern border, thereby protecting U.S. sovereignty and the cohesion of the American union and the society therein.

–Every American president, politician, judge, churchman, journalist, and professor since 1945 who has endangered the lives of Americans by unconstitutionally supporting — or refusing to effectively oppose — disunion, and so has paved the road to civil war by allowing the creation of “sanctuary” cities, states, and counties as a means of housing and protecting the Third World scum of murderers, rapists, illegal voters, kidnappers, criminals, and the diseased they have welcomed into the country.

–Every American politician serving in the Senate or Congress since 1945 who has endangered American lives by welcoming the illegal immigrants who have killed, raped, enslaved, dismembered, drunkenly run-over, and spread disease among Americans.

–Every leftist American federal judge serving since 1945 who has endangered American lives by preventing effective border control, by demanding treatment of illegal alien criminals as if they were law-abiding U.S. citizens, and by unconstitutionally blocking legitimate Executive Branch actions to protect Americans against illegal aliens.

–Every American politician, journalist, professor, and churchman who has, since 2001, endangered American lives by telling the public the palpable lie that “Islam is a religion of peace”, and then supported extra-legal protections for the clearly non-peaceful Muslims they have brought into the country with little or no vetting, like those who slaughtered Americans at San Bernardino, and those, like Ilhan Omar, who seems to have told us that she wants to see the slaughter of more. (NB: Only the stupid or lawless would try to deny Omar the right of free speech. In Omar’s and many other cases in our history, the 1st Amendment has been an invaluable tool of early warning because it allowed citizens to advertise their hatred for the republic and/or their loyalty to foreign movements and powers, as in the current performances of Omar and Gauleiters Nadler and Schiff.)

–Every American Senator and Congressman since 1945 who has endangered the lives Americans by reaching into their pockets to steal their money, and thereby reduce their families’ economic viability, and then gave that money to foreigners for whom neither America’s citizenry nor the government it owns – and can dismiss via the vote or, if necessary, the rifle and noose – bear even the slightest responsibility.

–Every technology titan, legacy media owner, and fact-checking guru since 1995 who has endangered the lives of Americans by censoring the dissemination of news so as to hide conservative and libertarian viewpoints in favor of the leftist tyranny that is now strangling to death the Constitution and the civil liberties it guarantees.

The foregoing list, of course, only contains ten of the many thousands of post-1945 instances where those most “endangering American lives” were well-known Americans who intended to do what they were doing. They were and are Americans who held positions of elected power and trust; individuals who commanded attention and influence because of their wealth, celebrity, or religious, military, judicial, academic, or civil-service authority; or because of their status as industrial, media, or financial leaders. Assange must face the accusations that are leveled against him, but, whatever the resulting decision is on that issue, it alone will not move the United States one inch closer to the restoration of republican government, a strong union with all states treated equally, and equality before the law for all.

As noted here, there are today many thousands of far more criminal, and much more deadly people to hunt than Julian Assange, and the hunt for them is now underway. If the hunt fails and is not reattempted by the government or the people, the republic will die.

But if the hunt fails because the hunters are found to lack the stomach for destroying the republic’s domestic enemies through constitutional means, the end of constitutional options for the termination of those enemies is not at hand. A well-armed and purposeful citizenry will still have its chance to act constitutionally and, indeed, act as the Founders intended them to act, which is — with determined faces, hardened hearts, and steady trigger fingers — to accept that it is their “right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security” and thereafter act accordingly.

A good many important events are swirling around, most unreported by the mainstream media. The marvelous ongoing destruction of the reign of the French emperor Macron by twenty-one weeks  of the yellow-vests’ activism — seasoned with increasing police violence against them — is virtually unknown to Americans. Ironically, interested Americans have to depend on big, bad Putin’s RT for live coverage of the revolt against the French tyrant.

Anyway, the French story is one for a day when I am better educated about it. For know the four following items must suffice.

Brexit. UK Minister May – the smug, self-ordained slayer of British liberty– appears to be on the verge of proving that the UK is no longer a nation where power is lodged in the citizenry. For the three years since the British people ordered their leaders to remove the country from the EU, May has strung out the process and then, at the last moment, tried to create an emergency situation that would permit a Brexit agreement that ties the UK even closer to the EU and surrenders more of its sovereignty and wealth to the tyranny in Brussels. The British political process appears chaotic at the moment, but it seems to be drifting toward telling the British majority who voted to leave the EU to drop dead. With no privately-held arms and armed only with votes that clearly mean nothing, the British electorate is powerless. By helping the effort to overthrow President Trump, May also has proven that the only U.S.-UK relationship that remains special is that between Britain’s political parties and the U.S. Democratic Party. All of them are corrupt, tyranny-peddlers, and all merit being erased from the face of the earth.

Joe Biden. Here is a man who is now the pale shadow of a former nothing. He accomplished nothing during forty years in the U.S. Senate, assisted Obama’s systematic destruction of the U.S. constitution, hates being white, and appears to be involved in extensive illegal financial activities – along with other members of his family – with Chinese and Ukrainian entities. These activities, he thinks, make him worthy to be president of the United States. Clearly, only an unthinking ass could come to such a conclusion, but as being an ass is the basic requirement for being a Democrat or supporter of the party, Biden may have a crack at gaining the party’s presidential nomination.

Before anyone decides to support Biden, even lamebrain Democrats, however, three videos are worth a look. The first is a video of an apparently drunken Biden behaving as an out-of-control fool. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmRXH7RkCZQ) Who would give command of the republic’s nuclear weapons to such a lush? The second is a video that contains clips of Biden fondling young female children in public on multiple occasions. This film strongly suggests Biden is looking to be far more than simply “affectionate” with the targeted kids. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWabeiBwKq8, Clips start at 17:23) The third video simply shows the kind of perverse, corrupt, and criminal adults and activities Biden eagerly has teamed up with and embraced for all his political life. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSSMG0MaEnQ )

The Monroe Doctrine. It was inevitable that John Bolton, Secretary Pompeo, Vice-President Pence, and Trump’s other Neocons would begin bleating about the necessity of using the Monroe Doctrine to overthrow Venezuelan President Maduro and evict the Russian and Chinese officials and troops that reportedly have arrived in Venezuela to support the ruling regime. The Neocons, however, are at least fifty-years too late to credibly use the Monroe Doctrine for anything.

Proclaimed in 1823, the Monroe Doctrine was a U.S. warning to the European powers against having any ambition to reestablish their empires in the western hemisphere or to create new colonies therein. This doctrine was the handy work of strong and credible men, JamesMonroe and John Quincy Adams. But that was long ago.

With our post-1945 political class’s naïve, even mindless assistance, the Europeans and Third Worlders reestablished beachheads in North America with the creation of the UN in 1945 and its placement on U.S. soil. Today, it is clear we have less to fear from Europeans in America than the Third Worlders. These unwanted, unneeded, largely illegal immigrants are remaking the once sparkling cities of San Francisco and New York into wastelands, contaminated by a growing number of diseases spread by people who are too stupid to know how to use indoor plumbing. Portland and Seattle are reported to be the next cities to be ruined and diseased by shitty people, shitting outdoors.

The Monroe Doctrine, moreover, was meant to be a two-way street. We certainly warned off the Europeans, but we quite clearly promised that, in return, the United States would stay out of Europe’s internal affairs, especially its wars. U.S. leaders, however, first violated this pledge by staging the unnecessary and ruinous U.S. military intervention in World War I, and then by Roosevelt’s deceitful manipulation of public opinion and crucifixion of Colonel Lindbergh — both activities aided by the overt and covert help of British intelligence and Jewish-American leaders — so as to be ready to repeat Wilson’s interventionist disaster when Japan attacked and Germany declared war, actions that allowed the portrayal of an unnecessary war as necessary. Not surprisingly, Roosevelt chose to save Europeans by focusing first on Germany’s defeat, instead of focusing America’s military fury on those who attacked Pearl Harbor.

The final straw that shattered the Monroe Doctrine’s quid pro quo occurred in 1949, when NATO was formed and the United States unnecessarily became, in matters related to war and peace, a European country. Since then, the republic has played the indentured servant to the European elites, becoming the hewer of weapons and drawer-down of U.S. national wealth to serve effete European leaders who had no intention, then or now, of defending their countries unless the United States was willing to shed far more blood, limbs, and money than those leaders were in Europe’s defense.

In other words, the Monroe Doctrine is a dead letter and that may be a good thing as the U.S. military has not won a war since 1945. Regarding Venezuela, Trump – unless he goes berserk – has let his little gang of juvenile Neocons play out their game to failure. These geniuses have killed the popularity of their hand-picked substitute president, and increased the likelihood that Maduro would be reelected by the people who elected and reelected him in the first place. Regarding the Russians and Chinese now in Venezuela, let them pay the freight for engaging in a certain-to-fail effort to feed and rebuild that demolished nation. For the United States, the only thing the Neocons ever wanted in Venezuela was war and oil. Trump must not become today’s General Smedley Butler, a man who led his Marines in battle in multiple unnecessary U.S. military interventions south of Texas. Those U.S. military operations were always conducted in the name of spreading democracy, but, as General Butler said, their sole goal was to preserve and expand the economic interests of J.P. Morgan, Chase Manhattan, other financial titans, and their shareholders.

The Gaulieters and Israel. The latest hate-driven operations by the Iron Cross-seeking Gaulieters Nadler and Schiff will lead to nothing substantive, but they will harass and defame the president, while robbing the republic of two more years of its life. What is it that has driven Jewish-Americans, seemingly as a whole, to hate a president who, despite their united and virulent opposition, has improved American living and economic conditions far more in two years than the Jewish-American-loved Obama-Biden regime did in eight?

In part, it is because of their disregard, even contempt for all Americans who are not part of their community, as well as those Americans who oppose the policies that the community’s spokesmen, media, celebrities, and political leaders make clear they love best; namely, abortion/infanticide; identity politics like those of Nazi Germany; Islamophobia; ending the electoral college,; open borders; minority rule; sexual deviancy redefined as normal behavior; white people, the climate-change hoax; demented feminism; neutering the 1^st, 2^nd, and 4^th Amendments; hating Americans from the southern states and the Midwest; and, most of all, Israel.

The Jewish-Americans’ deep-seated hatred for President Trump has existed since he announced his candidacy and today is broadcast far, wide, and daily. Starting with Bill Kristol’s anti-Trump obsession – yielding the destruction of his own magazine and, currently, his own hilariously self-demeaning role on CNN – leading members of the Jewish-American community in all walks of life have heaped hatred, vitriol, and lies upon Trump, his administration, and his family. Under this downpour of Jewish-American hate, Trump has conducted himself with more of the actions of a true Israel-First shill than almost any of his predecessors. The president has moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem: he has recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights; in his campaign to significantly reduce wasteful and often stupid foreign aid, he has made no mention of reducing the $38 billion in taxpayer funds that Israel is extorting from the U.S. Congress it owns; he has lavished praise on an apparently corrupt Israeli prime minister; and he has used his son-in-law to do Israel’s bidding in the farce known as the Middle East Peace Process. In other words, short of converting, Trump could not have done more in terms of behaving like an Israel-Firster – the direct opposite and deadly enemy of America First — and kowtowing to Jewish-Americans and Israel. Nor could he have done more in less time to solidify hatred for the United State in the minds of Muslims in America and around much of the Islamic world.

Which leaves two questions: Why do Jewish-Americans and their leaders and journalists so universally hate Trump? And why, in response to their mocking, scurrilous, and lying hatred, has the president continued to act as their pathetic yes-man?

I have no definitive answer, but I do have a speculation. The blazing hatred for Trump from Nadler, Schiff, Bloomberg, Wasserman-Schultz, Kristol, Durbin, Finestein, and so many other leading Jewish-Americans in politics, the media, the academy, and Hollywood could well mean that these creatures believe Trump will ultimately stop his slow application of an America First foreign and military policy by lethally turning on his, America First’s, and the republic’s greatest domestic enemies, of which there are five main groupings.

The first four are (a) the mid- and senior-levels of the federal bureaucracy, (b) the Democratic Party, (c) the academy, and (d) almost all of the media. The federal bureaucracy is already being culled of its richly verminous manpower – note the panic of Brennan, et. al — and the pace of that delightful process seems ready to pick up considerably. The Democratic Party is being destroyed by its socialist majority, and before long many dozens of its leaders will be facing the splendid pain inherent in the coming return of equal treatment under the law. No longer immune from the law that applies to all other Americans, these Democratic grandees will be humiliated, incarcerated, and forever vilified. The academy, too, will soon be  imploding as a consequence of the 1^st Amendment being restored to campuses. The academy’s hoard of two-bit, badly educated professors will confront the end of their courses on righteous feminism, anti-American U.S. history, gender studies, statue destruction, Antifa-sanctifying, the glories of sexual deviance, pedophilia, multiculturalism, and diversity, and a host of other useless topics once classrooms are again open to students who know these subjects are worthless and can be debated into oblivion by a bit of commonsense and the 1st Amendment’s ironclad protections. Not much needs to be said about the media. These Bloomsbury-like, faux intellectuals and sexually-uncertain weaklings have destroyed their own credibility, and will, if there is any justice, drown in the stinking cesspool they created and call home, all the while shrieking about Russian interference.

The republic’s fifth lethal enemy, unsurprisingly, is much of the country’s Jewish-American community and the state of Israel. It seems ridiculous to have to try to persuade Americans of this reality, especially after they have seen the Congress vote near unanimously to try to remove 1^st Amendment protections from a sitting, though reprehensible and dumb as a rock, congresswoman, and, again, near unanimously vote to give $38 billion to Israel. This rare unanimity comes at a time when the Congress cannot muster enough votes to fund relief for 16 million malnourished American children, for preventing infanticide, for restoring U.S. sovereignty, for stopping the inflow across open borders of fentanyl, heroin, pedophiles, MS-13 gangsters, women for forced prostitution, criminals, and young children for the pleasure of pedophiles.

Why would the 1^st Amendment be mangled and $38 billion given to Israel by massive congressional majorities, while solutions for America’s most serious and pressing problems cannot be passed? The answer: Jewish-Americans own the U.S. Congress and command majorities in both houses whenever they demand them. Their motto is “Everything for Israel, let Americans be killed, raped, starved, and addicted”.

But, if my hunch is correct, President Trump knows the depth, breadth, and power of these corrupting Jewish-American Israel Firsters. He surely also knows the enormous range of anti-American espionage operations – from suborning U.S. citizens to spy for Israel, to the theft of our intellectual property and technology – conducted by Israel’s intelligence services, with help from Israel-First U.S. citizens and some federal servants at all levels. If you will recall, when the fake FBI-DOJ Russian investigation began to unravel, the media reported that members of Israel’s diplomatic and intelligence services were involved in anti-Trump operations with the British, Australian, and Italian services. The reported Israeli role in the attempted coup has long-since disappeared from the media and, as far as I could find, the White House has never mentioned it.

My bet is that President Trump will make the disloyal Jewish-Americans and their country of first allegiance the last target on the above list of the five deadly enemies of the republic. The president seems to have insulated himself – through his butt-kissing praise for Israel and such Neocon stupidities as his decisions on Jerusalem and the Golan Heights – from any accusations of anti-Israeli thoughts, words, or behavior. When the time comes, Trump will have massive, and massively persuasive, data that will disclose to Americans the details of Israel’s longtime corruption of the U.S. Congress; campaign of espionage against the U.S. government and military; and practice of sharing U.S. technology and other classified information with the republic’s enemies. When Trump does this, Israel and Jewish-American Israel Firsters, together with the extraordinary damage they have done to U.S. foreign policy and the republic as a whole, will be, at long last, just an annoying memory.

During the years of the Muellar investigation the terms “treason” and “sedition” have been prominent in many discussions of the legal penalties appropriate for the government officials who set the witch hunt of President Trump underway and then prolonged it as far as possible. Now that the investigation is over and the President was not indicted, the full power of the law must be applied against those who deliberately robbed the republic of more than two years of its life solely because they lost an election and hate the man who beat them.

In other words, this episode is not finished, and it will not be complete until the Department of Justice cleanses itself and the FBI of those who began and abetted the witch hunt, and the President orders the directors of NSA, CIA, and any other participating federal agency to do the same. The number involved in this fraud probably will be in the hundreds. Ideally, all such disloyal people should be indicted and tried for their illegal behavior, but at a minimum they must be publicly named, fired, disenfranchised, and permanently banned from future employment with the national government.

For the high-ranking civil servants and politicians at all levels involved in the witch hunt, now is not a time for Americans to engage in the forgiveness and reconciliation they have shown themselves capable of in the past. In many ways, the past two-plus years posed more of a threat to the republic’s survival than the civil war. At worst, a Confederate victory would have would have created two North American republics with nearly identical Constitutions. A victory for the unconstitutional, Obama-led witch hunt against Trump, on the other hand, would have led to the removal of a legitimate president for no reason save his foes’ hatred and lust for power; the further accretion of power to the federal government; the federalization of elections, the simple description of which is tyranny; the end of, at least, the Electoral College and the 1^st, 2^nd, and 4^th Amendments, and open borders and unlimited immigration. The legal retribution against those who have acted in a manner meant to destroy the republic must be precise, as fair as possible, and it must be conducted in public, go wherever the evidence leads, and led by prosecutors who proceed remorselessly.

On the issue of treason, it seems likely that an indictment of Barack Obama would lead to a trial in which he would be found to have met the Constitution’s definition of treason, and would be convicted and, if justice prevails, executed. We already know, for example:

–That Obama asked Britain’s sigint agency and government, through Susan Rice passing on his request, to maintain its clandestine coverage of Trump, For this we have a document signed by the head of UK’s sigint service that was passed on and approved by Britain’s foreign secretary.

–That, at Obama’s request, Britain’s Mi6, with the Italian, Australian, and Israeli intelligence services, worked with parts of the CIA and FBI to wreck Trump’s campaign and, afterwards, to overthrow his administration. All of this assistance had to have been arranged by former CIA Director John Brennan, and none of those services would have given him the time of day on such an issue if he did not have, and prove that he had, Obama’s authorization to do so.

That, to reconfirm the foregoing, we know that the multiple “foreign governments” that Obama enlisted to attack the republic have interceded with President Trump and asked that he not declassify documents showing that they knowingly and willingly assisted Obama and his lieutenants to try to stage a coup d’état against a legitimately elected U.S. government.

Obama’s deliberate arranging of this already well-documented and large-scale intervention by foreign powers to subvert a presidential election and then a sitting administration must surely meet the Constitution’s rightly rigorous requirements for a treason charge and, ultimately, conviction.

Another of the Founders’ foremost teachers among the English republicans, Algernon Sidney, nicely summarized the meaning of a country’s leader secures the assistance of foreigners to attack his countrymen:

And whatever Prince seeks assistance from foreign Powers, or makes Leagues with any stranger or enemy for his own advantage against his people, however secret the Treaty may be, declares himself not to be the Head, but an enemy to them. The Head cannot stand in need of an exterior help against the Body, nor subsist when divided from it. He therefore that courts such an assistance, divides himself from the Body; and if he does subsist, it must be by a life he has in himself, distinct from that of the Body, which the Head cannot have. (1)

Replacing the word “Prince” with “Obama” catches exactly what Barack Obama apparently did to attack all Americans in an attempt to destroy their republic, their liberties, and their independence. He deliberately separated himself from the citizenry and now stands isolated and deserving of being described as the treasonous enemy of the Constitution and equality before the law. Such an allegation of treason must, of course, be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt in open court proceedings.

That said, if Obama is indicted for his seeming treason and is convicted, I pray that the rotten bastard swings.

–Endnote:

–1.) Algernon Sydney. Discourses Concerning Government. Indianapolis, In: Liberty Fund, 1996, p. 540. (This editor of Sydney’s book was Professor Thomas G. West)

A bullet from the back of a bush took Medgar Evers’ blood
A finger fired the trigger to his name
A handle hid out in the dark
A hand set the spark
Two eyes took the aim
Behind a man’s brain
But he can’t be blamed
He’s only a pawn in their game

–Bob Dylan, Only a Pawn in Their Game, 1963

Only in the English-speaking could this keep happening. An Australian shooter — perhaps a new version of the brilliant Mr. Dylan’s pawn — goes to New Zealand, murders fifty Muslim citizens, and the world again is subjected to two inevitable events. First, the anti-gun activists who know and care nothing about the dead Muslims in Christchurch have started the inevitable grief festival – candles, flowers, notes, and other crap – as well as chanting the Islam-is-the-religion-of-peace mantra. Second, an obviously unfit, nerdy, and anti-gun New Zealand Prime Minister — Jacinda Ardern – launches an attack on her own people because her intelligence and police services failed to track the attacker, and then took forever to get to the scene of the murders. Like Barack Obama’s consistent behavior in similar situations, Ardern’s first instinct was anti-gun, and she swore to disarm New Zealanders in short order.

Now, let’s get this straight. The Australian attacker, given his behavior during the attack, clearly is a trained and skilled mercenary. This judgment is backed by what the press has reported about his globetrotting itinerary, which shows that he focused his travel on countries where fighting and drug trafficking are commonplace. Are we really to believe that New Zealand’s intelligence and security services were stupid or lazy enough not to have watch-listed this man, asked the Australians to keep close tabs on him in that country, or shared the data about him with MI-6 and CIA, both of which are better positioned than New Zealand’s services to keep track of him as he traveled, as well as to provide early warning of his ill-intent.

If you do not accept that such an utterly complete failure occurred, you would almost think that “Five-Eyes” cooperation in regard to this attack was meant to assure that the Australian shooter succeeded. After all, parts of the British, Australian, and U.S. external intelligence services cooperatively worked with Obama, the Democratic Party, and the international media to overthrow the legitimately elected Trump administration. In this light, it is not at all odd that the attacker’s so-called manifesto amounts to one stone that hit two of the Democrats’ favorite birds, their goal of undermining and eventually eliminating Trump, and their desperate eagerness to end the ability of private citizens to possess the guns needed to prevent the authoritarian, one-party state they want to install in the United States.

There also are the facts that former-DNI James Clapper was in Australia for visit in November, 2018, and former-DNC chief John Podesta was in New Zealand for several days in March, 2019. Both men fully support the elimination of President Trump and the U.S. Democratic Party’s policy of creating and managing armed terrorist wings like ANTIFA, BLM, and BAM to riot, burn cars, destroy other property, and intimidate and attack people – usually Trump supporters — in the United States. Only idiots would accept the two visits as simple coincidences and reject out of hand a hunch that either or both men had something to do with the Christchurch attack. Both men should be seen as “persons of interest” until their presence and meetings in both countries are thoroughly investigated and fully explained to the public.

The official story of the shootings cannot, at this point, be accepted at face value. Unless an explanation comes forth that contains more commonsense, and far less nonsense, one will have to conclude that what the public so far has been told is a lie, and the Christchurch attack, like the Las Vegas attack in the United States, was sponsored by forces antithetical to individual rights, free speech, and the ability of people to defend themselves against the armed terrorists who are on the payrolls of the Democratic party and its sister parties around the world, especially in the English-speaking world.

To cap off this badly played farce, New Zealand Prime Minister Ardern – the female complement to Barack Obama – decides to take immediate, savage, and Obama-like political advantage of fifty dead Muslims even before their blood congeals. Because of the attack, she announces her intention to disarm New Zealanders; the media say that some Kiwi patsies have already surrendered their weapons. Ardern, thank God, looks likely to have a pretty quick end to her political career. This dimwit wants to disarm her countrymen at precisely the moment when the country must begin preparing for a near-certain and major Islamist attack in New Zealand. If anyone thinks the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, or East Asia-based Islamist groups will fail to avenge the Muslims’ murder with an attack on New Zealand’s people and interests, they could be sold a pyramid or a warehouse full of 2016 Hillary Clinton for president posters.

Ardern also has asked the next G-20 meeting to take measures that would amount to the international censoring of articles and sites on the internet and social media that G-20 leaders and their advisers deem dangerous. You can bet your last dollar that any such effort would yield regulations to exterminate the presence of conservative, anti-establishment, and anti-globalist commentators, as well as global-warming skeptics, from the internet and social media, while protecting the advocates of each of those causes. In simple terms, if Ardern succeeds, the fascists win.

For the countries and peoples of English-speaking world, it is more important than ever before that the citizenry be as heavily armed as possible. Never before have they encountered as powerful and self-avowed domestic enemy of their freedoms, civil liberties, traditions, histories, religions, and language as they now face from those who call themselves “Progressives”. If the time comes to definitively end this growing progressive oppression, armed citizens will find that targets are both plentiful and more than deserving of being sent to eternal pain.

Nearly three years ago, the majority of the British electorate voted in a referendum to leave the EU. The British voters were sick of Brussels’ authoritarians strutting, preening, and acting as their masters; the EU-sanctioned flood of unwanted, diseased, unskilled, uneducated, and violent migrants; the refusal of their own government to protect them from that wave of human refuse; and the increasingly clear reality that the power of the British Parliament, judiciary, and laws was being blunted by EU institutions. It also was clear — though nearly all British media ignored this fact — that the civil liberties of Britons were being constricted in favor of giving legal preference to migrants. So much is this the reality, that a native-born Briton defending himself against a threat by, say, a knife-wielding Muslim, is more likely to be damned than helped by the law.

While shocked by the public’s support for what was, in essence, a freedom referendum meant to make sure that Britons once again would be ruled by Britons, and that British sovereignty, independence, and nationalism could again flourish, Britain’s political class stayed cool. The oh-so-wise. British upper-class – long ensconced in the parts of the Conservative Party — joined with other Conservative, Liberal, and Labor leaders, business titans, and almost all of the nation’s media to undermine, slow-roll, terrify the citizenry, and, eventually, undo the result of a legitimate referendum that approved the UK’s departure from the EU. To date they have succeeded. With very few exceptions, those working to keep the UK mired in the EU swamp have used every possible artifice to disguise their obvious contempt for the pro-exit voters’ because of lower socio-economic status, lack of Oxbridge educations, and cheeky uppityness in challenging what their betters had so kindly done for them by making Britons the groveling subjects of the mighty EU.

As the March 29^th, 2019, deadline for the referendum-sanctioned UK withdrawal from the EU approaches it is emphatically clear that neither the Prime Minister, the Parliament, the House of Lords, nor the political establishment as a whole intend to do what the voters demanded they do. Instead, they will debate, comment, introduce new withdrawal plans, and create organizations that support a second referendum to overrule the first. The second referendum, like the 2018 U.S midterm elections, will turn not on the re-expression of the people’s will but on the number of illegal ballots that are needed to ensure vote totals that keep Britain in the EU.

These past three years of debate on withdrawal from the EU demonstrate, not the concern of the British governing class for the country’s economic future or the population’s welfare, but rather the fact that the governing elite does not have the least fear of the people who vote for them, and thereby instruct them  about what to do. Britain’s upper-class governing elite has been conditioned to regard their countrymen as docile, non-threatening semi-humans who will take any amount of disenfranchisement or other forms of abuse the elite chooses to dispense. After all, the British elites believe:

–We dismantled the UK immigration-control system and let in a plague of unwanted Muslim and other economically and socially debilitating migrants, and they did nothing.

–We allowed Brussels to pass judgement on our laws and virtually all governmental policy decisions, and they did nothing.

–We sent tens of billions of pounds to Brussels to be dispersed to the EU’s long line of loser states and Third World shitholes, and they did nothing.

–We passed laws to give legal preferment to Muslim migrants and reduced the civil liberties of the native-born, and they did nothing.

–We read or listened to all of their electronic communications, and even sent them to jail for their thoughts or speech, and they did nothing.

–We have killed and maimed their children in the military by starting unnecessary wars that we did not intend to win, and they did nothing.

–We limited the ability of the police to apprehend or kill the many Muslim migrants who have made knifing the native-born their main recreational activity.

–We have turned a blind-eye to Muslim migrants who are grooming young, native-born British girls for future raping, and they did nothing.

These people, these voters, the British elite has concluded, will abide any pain, poverty, humiliation, betrayal, and legal degradation we fix on them, and they will do nothing but vote us back into power. The pro-exit voters may be Britons, the pro-EU elite has concluded, but if they are, they are mindless British sheep.

And now these British elitists, these so superior politicians, journalists, professors, businessmen, pundits, etc. will brazenly prove, by ignoring the exit-referendum’s results, that the sheep can vote whatever they they want, but we will still do want we want. Britain will remain in the EU forever, under any terms we decide to shackle on Britons, and they will do nothing.

How can this be happening? The answer is simple and the lesson is clear. The elite have ensured that Britons have long been virtually unarmed, and that their schools have taught students only to obey, not to think. What, then, have these elitists to fear from those in whom all power supposedly rests? To date the answer has been nothing. A politician, journalist, professor, parliamentarian, businessman, or prime minister, who does not keep a slight but always present fear in the back of his mind that people can only be pushed and abused for so long, historically is the stuff that sneering tyrants and popular anti-regime violence are made from. In Britain, today, there is an enormous number of the former, and none of the latter who, being disarmed, cannot put a sense of fear into their tyrannical masters.

It appears to be too late for Britons to protect themselves, and save their laws, their culture, and their nation from the UK’s elite, EU-worshiping tyrants, but it is not too late for Americans beat off their domestic grandees. So long as Americans maintain their 2^nd Amendment rights – even by killing those who would dare try to neuter them – they will be following the all-to-true warning of, oddly enough, an Englishman whom the American Founders respected and, obviously, took to heart for themselves and their posterity.  “[O]ur ancestors were willing,” John Milton wrote in his Defence of the People of England

“to put anything into the king’s power rather than their arms and the garrisons of their towns; conceiving that that would be as if they went about to hand over their liberty to the unrestrained cruelty of their kings.”

John Milton was saying that free men must never allow the power of the sword to belong to the king alone. By allowing themselves to be disarmed, Britons long ago handed over their liberty to the “unrestrained cruelty of their kings.” It seems much too late for Britons to recover their lost liberties, but it is not too late for Americans. So long as they protect the 2^nd Amendment, Americans will have a chance to recover their eroded liberties and defend themselves and their republic.

Who knows, perhaps the Americans-killing, no votes on border control by the MS-13 faction of Republican U.S. Senators on 14 March 2019, may be close to the last straw for those who oppose that kind of consistently bloody-minded, callous disregard for the citizenry’s lives and welfare. Endangered Americans ought to recall a few of the other words written by the estimable Mr. Milton: “[I]t is in the highest degree agreeable to the law of nature, that tyrants should be punished….”

When I was a kid, our high-school classes spent several afternoons, over four years, watching films of events from the Nazis’ long list of atrocities, especially of the concentration camps as they were when liberated in the spring of 1945. The films were terrible at first, after four years of high school they were still terrible, and they remain terrible today. But the shocking impact they had at first lessened, and the repetition gave rise to questions of why do we have to keep watching. It was terrible, it must not happen again, etc., etc., etc. We got it at the first showing, owned it after the second, and were respectively silent but much less interested the third and fourth times through.

The one exception for me was the film of the flamboyantly arrogant, taunting, and deeply cruel Nazi judges sentencing to death those who were said to oppose the regime, and later those accused of trying to kill Hitler in July, 1944, individuals who were often hung with piano wire. The sneering faces of those judges have stayed with me over all of the succeeding years. And it was only decades later that I began to recognize that all the kids who watched those films were being conditioned never to question, no, to be afraid to question, the republic’s ties to Israel. Quiet simply, the films taught American kids not only the horrors of Hitlerism, but that a person criticizing Israel would be identified and damned as an anti-Semite

The enduring and still horrible memory of the film of the judges in action makes it rather startling to see two Jewish-American Democratic congressmen act so much like those Nazi judges since becoming heads of congressional committees. Both Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler are now publicly behaving in much the same arrogant and flamboyantly cruel manner as the hanging-judges in Hitler’s service. After designating human targets for removal, the Nazi judges and the regime’s prosecutors made up dossiers of false events and fabricated evidence, photographs, and testimonies. They then identified this body of lies as “proof”, and convicted the targeted individual, who was then sent to prison or, more often, to death. This was a swift and efficient legal system, but it had nothing, of course, to do with justice.

We have now seen much of Adam Schiff. Nearly three years of his frantic, guilty-like behavior, bulging, frightened eyes, cascades of highly classified leaks, and accumulating internet reporting about his own illegal and deviant actions. Like Nazi judges, Shiff maintains a smug and condescending presence in the Congress and media, apparently believing the swamp is all powerful and eternal, the same attitude that Nazi judges mistakenly held about the thousand year Reich.

Nadler is even worse. After watching Nadler in committee sessions and media interviews dealing with President Trump, you can understand the workings of the minds of those Nazi judges. No evidence, no witnesses, no photographs, no admissions, no recordings or films, no matter, Nadler’s performance says, Trump is guilty because we say so, and we will be rid of him by drowning him in a tide of lies, innuendo, and media bias. Nadler may not be able to string Trump up with the Nazis’ favorite brand of piano wire, but his desire to hang a man against whom nothing has been proven is as palpable as that manifested by the National Socialist jurists.

Underscoring the appalling nature of the words and actions of Schiff and Nadler is the fact that they are attacking one of their own countrymen. Like most Jewish-American politicians, organizations, media outlets, voters, community and organization leaders, movie stars, journalists, and pundits, Schiff and Nadler hate Trump. Why?

Well, my own view is that they hate Trump because of those two marvelous and increasingly popular Lindberghian words “America First”. Despite the president’s nauseatingly lofty rhetoric in favor of Israel, Schiff and Nadler know that Trump, if he is to regain American sovereignty and independence in full, ultimately must cut the ropes that hold the republic like Gulliver in the thrall of Jewish-Americans and their country of first allegiance, Israel. Indeed, Schiff, Nadler, and their kind will never shy away from destroying the name, reputation, and career of any American who does not toe the Israel-First line, even if following their lead means shoveling out $4-plus billion a year to Israel, while 16 million American kids go to bed malnourished every night. Improving the nourishment, health, and lives of even 1,000 of those kids would be of infinitely more value to the republic than Israel ever has been or ever can be.

I also have to acknowledge that I experienced Gauleiter Nadler’s scorched-earth passion to annihilate those of his fellow Americans who refuse to lick the boots of Israel and their thug-like –e.g. Rahm Emanuel — Jewish-American supporters. In October, 2013, I testified before the Congress’s homeland security sub-committee on the issue of what motivates young Muslims to become jihadis. In that session, I listed six motivators, including a half-century of U.S. support for Arab tyranny, and the U.S. government’s humiliatingly womanish willingness to do Israel’s biding and defend nearly everything it does. The video of that session was on YouTube until the Democrats retook the House in 2018. It has since been removed. About nine minutes of the video of my discussion with Peter King and a decidedly odd fellow named Stewart, the latter a budding Joe McCarthy from Utah, can still be seen, for now, at https://mondoweiss.net/2013/10/relationship-americans-fighting/.

On 18 October 2013, Herr von Nadler gave the media paragon BuzzFeed a statement about me. He also apparently gave it to all House and Senate members. BuzzFeed printed Herr von Nadler’s diktat, and it said, in part,

“Dr. Michael Scheuer’s extreme views toward Israel are well known. The fact that the Republican majority invited such a blatantly outspoken anti-Israel activist is inexcusable. Dr. Scheuer’s testimony before the Homeland Security Committee recommending that America ‘dump the Israelis tomorrow’ couldn’t be more wrong. A strong U.S.-Israel relationship is absolutely vital to the national security interests of the United States. I’m not sure why the Republican-controlled Homeland Security Committee would want to be amplifying Dr. Scheuer’s harmful message.” (1)

Not surprisingly, I was never again asked to speak to the Congress. I also lost my adjunct professorship at Georgetown University almost immediately after the statement was published. Oddly, I was teaching in the 2013 fall semester and no one at Georgetown told me that I had been dismissed. I did not find out until early January, 2014, when I realized the usual request from the university’s bookstore for a list of books I needed for the spring semester had not arrived. I called the head of my department to let him know that I had not received the list, and his response was akin to, “Oh, I owe you an apology. We decided last fall that we did not need you or your course on al-Qaeda and jihadism any more, but I forgot to tell you.”

Thus, the hate, malice, and destructiveness of the Israel-Firsters toward fellow Americans who object to Israel’s chokehold on the republic and its treasury, Congress, and media, extends from the great, like President Trump, to the truly insignificant, like me.

During Mr. Trump’s recent visit to the U.S. troops still ridiculously based in Iraq, he told them and all Americans, that the United States would no longer play the “sucker” to the rest of the world. It surely is true that the President has alleviated some of the republic’s longstanding status of international sucker-hood, but perhaps the most dangerous and expensive case of our sucker-hood will remain cemented in place so long as the republic continues to willingly play the fool for Israel and Jewish-Americans, and allows Israel-First cretins like Schiff, Nadler, and their like to abridge the free-speech rights of Americans.

It would be well, I think, for Mr. Trump to read and take to heart a 1796 letter from George Washington to Alexander Hamilton. Washington’s usual reserved demeanor was, in this instance, noticeably absent. In the letter, he vigorously damned reports that the Directory of revolutionary France was going to send an envoy – perhaps accompanied by a French fleet — to demand from him the “annihilation” of the Anglo-American agreement known as Jay’s Treaty, or face war with France. “We will not,” Washington told Hamilton,

be dictated to by the Politics of any Nation under Heaven, farther than Treaties require of us. … But if we are to be told by a foreign Power (if our engagements with it are not infracted) what we shall do, and what we shall not do, we have Independence yet to seek, and have contended hitherto for very little. (2)

Washington also knew that such a French demand would be supported by disloyal Americans who allied themselves with the French, even to the point of wanting the republic to join France’s war against Britain and much of Europe. Washington said that such support amounted to “the misconduct of some of our own intemperate people, who seem to have preferred throwing themselves into the Arms of France (even under the present circumstances of that country) to the manly, and Neutral conduct which is so essential, and would so well become us, as an Independent Nation.” (3)

Washington, with these words, provides contemporary Americans and their president with a precise description of the situation the republic today faces with Israel. The pro-Israel senators and representatives who place Israel’s interests above those of America’s have indeed thrown themselves into the “Arms of Israel”, and are eager to arrange the “annihilation” of any U.S. citizen’s free speech, income, and reputation if they dare to express loathing and anger for pro-Israel Democratic and Republican politicians in Congress, the men and women who have created and maintained the republic’s decades-long, sucker-like readiness to play the role of Israel’s slave.

If you are serious about America First, Mr. President, release the documents that show the part that Israeli diplomats and intelligence agents played – in cooperation with their colleagues from the UK, Australia, and Italy – in the attempt to overthrow a legitimately elected U.S. government. You could also throw in the proof you have in your possession of Israeli espionage operations in the United States, its theft of intellectual property from American businesses, and its provision of U.S. technology to China and Russia. You might even add to the mix the fact of Israel’s dastardly, murderous, and Imperial-Japan-like attack on the USS Liberty. Taken together, these items would be more than enough justification to give Israel and its Jewish-American operatives the heave ho, leave them to their own devices, and finally erase the word “sucker” from the republic’s forehead.

Endnotes:

–1.) https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/democratic-congressman-blasts-republicans-for-inviting-anti and https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20140203-former-cia-officer-tells-security-committee-i-d-dump-the-israelis-tomorrow/

–2.) George Washinton to Alexander Hamilton, 8 May 1796, in W.B. Allen, (Ed.). George Washington. A Collection. Indianapolis, IN; Liberty Fund, p. 630

–3.) Ibid., p. 631

In the senate career of Rand Paul, the first two months of 2019 have been revelatory. After running for the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016 – and appearing to have no reliably substantive and consistent stance on many issues – he seemed to become a steady, America First conservative in 2017-2018. Now, in less than ten weeks, Senator Paul has been (a) rather  quiescent in the face the Trump neocons’  loud and accelerating drive for regime change in Venezuela; (b) unfazed by the continuation of open borders and, seemingly, unlimited imports of fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamine, heroin, illegal voters, child-trafficking for pedophile consumption, dole-seekers, illegal criminal aliens, etc.; and (c) eager to canonize the wretched Koch brothers, who seem to stand for the same things and have many hundreds of thousands of dollars to send the Senator’s way. In Rand Paul’s case, it increasingly appears that the apple has fallen very, very far from the tree, and, miraculously, turned into a jackass.

FOX’s morning show’s slogan “Mornings are better with friends” apparently has been changed to “Mornings are better with Israel-First, no American can question that fact”. This morning, Doocy, Kilmeade, and their female echo all attacked the lunatic congresswomen from Minnesota not because she is foul-mouthed, a dufus, unfit to serve, and anti-American – which she obviously is – but because she criticizes Israel and believes the Congress is controlled by Jewish-American money and media power. Imagine that. All of the statements by Ms. Omar prove is that even a dufus from Minnesota is right once in a while. Just as in the case of the late and not lamented Khashoggi, the House of Representatives has asked “how high?” when AIPAC and the Jewish-American congressional members ordered “Jump, lackeys, and neuter Ilhan Omar!” No matter how regrettably, Omar is a U.S. citizen elected by other U.S. citizens to serve them. Both as a citizen and now as a representative she owes no allegiance, respect, or silence to Israel; she has an irrefutable right to say – without fear — what she pleases about that foreign, and not infrequently anti-American nation; and has a duty to try and expose the enormous extent to which Israel and their disloyal Jewish-American allies have corrupted both houses of the Congress. The republic would be better off without Ms. Omar – as it would have without John McCain — but it would be eternally better off without having to pay Israel $4-plus billion per year; defend Israel at every turn, even by robbing U.S. citizens of their protections under the Bill of Rights; and serve as Israel’s servile military protector against a billion Muslims.

There are so many significant events occurring that it is hard to determine which are the most important. Therefore, the following comments treat just three of the issues.

–Venezuela: The ongoing U.S. intervention in Colombia is as pure a Neoconservative operation as it is possible to imagine. The Neocons want to kick out one socialist president and install another socialist president, a process they describe as an effort to reestablish a Venezuelan democracy.

Now, why would any American believe this? We have seen the Neocons do the same thing in Libya, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, etc. and none of those mad crusades yielded anything approximating a democratic or republican system of government. What they yielded were dead and maimed Americans and a bankrupt U.S. Treasury. Indeed, while the Neocons insist that they are spreading democracy in Venezuela, they are resolutely backing their colleagues in the NATO governments, even as most of those regimes are actively adopting laws suppressing free speech; ignoring majority votes of the electorate; arresting and jailing citizens for opposing government policy, especially on immigration; limiting the right of assembly; and, naturally, increasing efforts to stop any flow of weapons to their long-disarmed and now migrant-and regime-besieged citizenry, knowing that civil wars are coming in several NATO countries.

In Venezuela, the Neocons will eventually arrange a well-choreographed, violent event – just as their direct ancestors the Nazis did by staging “Polish attacks” on German border posts on the morning of 3 September 1939 – that will be used to further propagandize Americans to support the addition of the U.S. military to the Neocons’ growing intervention in Venezuela, an operation that is meant to do only one thing; namely, enable U.S. oil companies to acquire control and then exploit Venezuela’s massive oil reserves.

Why Trump and Senator Paul are on the side of this Neocon intervention is beyond understanding because what has happened in Venezuela under Chavez and Maduro has not cost a single American life or limb, which, of course, is exactly the case that existed during most of the war in Syria – until the U.S. military intervened. They also must know – and are ignoring — an irrefutable fact that was written most succinctly by George Kennan in 1996. “Nothing in the vast historical record,” Kennan wrote in response to the idea that U.S. military intervention can remove non-democratic regimes and ensure democracies take root, “justifies the common American assumption that anyone who opposes oppression would, if he were to succeed in overthrowing it, inevitably govern more humanely himself.” (1) Quite simply, what Trump’s Neocons are doing in Venezuela has zero to do with democracy or humanitarian relief, it has only to do with oil and their own lust for unending war.

–Andrew McCabe: MaCabe is an odd duck, although he and Mrs. McCabe probably are living a temporary, upper-class high life, before justice of one sort another hits them for the $700,000 in help-Hillary-money given the latter by Terry Mcauliffe. McCabe is wandering around the country hawking a book in which he acknowledges that he and many other senior DOJ and FBI officials plotted to remove a legitimately elected president. He seems proud of the unconstitutional effort he began, and seems to deem himself immune from legal retribution for his seditious or treasonous activities.

Well, maybe he is. Both Clintons, both Podestas, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, Eric Holder, and Adam Shiff, are all walking the streets with smug, McCabe-like attitudes. Some of them – with President Obama, John Kerry, and Senator Finestein – also appear to be involved in deliberately passing highly classified intelligence to China, either automatically via Mrs. Clinton’s unsecured basement server or simply by traveling to China to hand over the classified data to their paymasters in Beijing.

Never, I would estimate, has the American citizenry been treated to such a clear example of the two-tiered U.S. legal system, where the rich and influential break the law at will and publicly without penalty, while other Americans are jailed for bouncing a $100 check, buying marijuana, shoplifting, or driving under the influence. This reality must be very publicly destroyed by constitutional means – which must include public executions for the guilty – or it will be destroyed, probably with much less precision, by a well-armed and, in many cases, combat-experienced America-First citizenry supplied with an endless supply of sturdy, made-in-America rope. Much of the citizenry, I sense, has had enough and wants no more debate on how to fix all that is broken or ignored in the republic’s legal system. It seems a time for action, not more feckless “national conversations”.

–The 2020 Presidential Election and after: This is a rather natural follow-on to the above piece on McCabe. Although Steve Bannon said last weekend that 2019 will see the most important, if scabrous political debate since the last few antebellum years, but I doubt it. Who will listen? Americans who voted for Trump and those who have converted to his side since the 2016 election have heard all the need to know about what the Democrats intend to do to them, their families, and their republic. The also have seen that intention acted out dozens of times in the videos of police across the country standing back and letting the Antifa militia destroy property, burn cars, and attack citizens for their political, social, and religious beliefs. Yesterday, they also saw a target list of 43 Democratic senators support the murdering of new-borns because they were lucky enough to evade the blade of a smiling AMA butcher seeking kill them in the womb.

These Americans know in their gut that America simply cannot survive the continuation in office of the kind of lethal human scum that is found in the likes of McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strozh, Obama, Powers, the Clintons, Rice, Kerry, Admiral McRaven, and so many others who have served in or for Democratic administrations at the national, state, and city levels. Likewise, they know that America could not survive the election of another Neoconservative government like that of George W. Bush, a war-mongering bunch that featured far too many of the Neocons who are now poisoning Trump’s plans for an America First foreign policy.

We have had too many presidential elections that have been described as “turning points”, and those thus described – like the elections of Bush and Obama – were singular and near-fatal disasters for the republic, just as a victorious Hillary Clinton campaign would have been the fatal icing on an already baked, republic-killing cake.

No, the 2020 presidential election will not be a turning point for America, but rather it will be a final reckoning. Americans know the stinking uselessness, war-mongering, and double-crossing of the Republicans, save for the House’s Freedom Caucus and perhaps a dozen Senators. They also know the endless lawlessness, greed, corruption, infant-murdering, treason and sedition, Christianity-hating, war-mongering, and election-rigging of the Democrats, as well as the approval of most of the media and the average Democratic voter for that behavior.

The rigged 2018 mid-term elections, moreover, reinforced the anti-republicanism and anti-constitutionalism that has festering in the hearts and minds of Democrats since their party led an unjustified secession from the Union in 1861. The 2018 election brought into office an odious gaggle of bigoted, insane, and deviant congressional representatives – mostly from the lunatic, leftist fringes of minority groups and, not surprisingly, mostly women. Together these facts make the idea of the Democrats regaining the White House intolerable as a possibility, and one that, as a reality, would make civil war not a necessity, but a constitutional duty.

The historical point just alluded to deserves a further comment. When Jefferson Davis and his governing colleagues led the Confederate States of America (C.S.A.) out of the Union in the spring of 1861, they were motivated to act on the basis of fears about what detrimental policies Lincoln and his administration might try to impose on the South. They particularly feared that the north, under Lincoln, would seek to end slavery. That worry worry was as much a fantasy as a fear. Lincoln knew without equivocation that the North was unwilling, in 1861, to fight a war to end slavery. If Lincoln had called for a military response to Davis’s bombardment of Fort Sumter and openly identified it as war to free the slaves – an absolutely unconstitutional action – he and his lieutenants would have not been able to raise a force capable of even remotely approaching that goal, let alone one eager and able to defeat the South’s armies, which, in such a war, would have been legitimately defending the Constitution. Lincoln, instead, identified the war as an effort to save the Union, an identification that brought northern men to the flag and battlefield in large numbers for the duration of the war.

In 2020 presidential election, the other side of the 1861 coin will pertain to the republic. The Americans who eagerly will take up arms, pens, and prayers to annihilate the 2020 Democrats, if they prevail in the election they surely will rig, will be acting, unlike the C.S.A., not on often-unfounded fears of the future, but on a detailed knowledge of ugly facts – the brain-dead, anti-human socialism of Sanders and Cortez; the violent attacks by Antifa, BLM, and BAM; and the greed, lawlessness, and treason of so-called “centrist” Democrats — as well as on the hard-earned lessons taught them by the Democrats’ decades-long sordid and lawless behaviors, and their steady and always expanding preference for anti-American rhetoric, policies, and actions.

Never, in U.S. history, have Americans confronted a domestic enemy at once so arrogant, lethal, and detestable as the Democrats; one that truthfully can boast of a thoroughly documented history of hatred for and violent actions against the interests and future of the republic and its citizenry; and one that much more than merits a ruthless, root-and-branch annihilation.

The 2020 election and its aftermath, then, will determine whether America’s republican experiment is at an end, or if that experiment can be reinvigorated and joyfully rebuilt on the steadily mouldering bodies of the Democrats who clearly intended to first pervert and then to kill it.

Decuple: A word from Middle French via Latin and meaning “an amount ten times as much or as many”. (1)

A new national day of commemoration is in order, and a bill should be submitted to Congress to designate the occasion. The republic already has two holidays commemorating and honoring all of those who have died in its wars; Memorial Day – originally for the dead of the Civil War – and Armistice (now Veterans’) Day. Both days are set aside to rightly honor and mourn the nearly 700,000 Americans who have died in combat in the republic’s wars, necessary and unnecessary.

The Jewish-Americans’ recent commemoration of “Holocaust Day” set me thinking about a new American day of commemoration. So as not to distract from that somber Jewish day of remembrance, I thought it best to seek a different name for this solely American day of remembrance. After some reflection, I think the day could be named “Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day”, meaning  “Ten-Times-the-Holocaust Remembrance Day”, Let me explain.

The world, as is well-known, has been the scene of mass-murders for almost as long as man has walked the planet. The Mongols’ sack of Baghdad and the Crusaders’ multiple massacres of Muslims in Jerusalem and the Holy Land are just two early examples. In the 20^th century, however, mass murder hit its full stride. Hitler and his Nazis killed six million Jews, Gypsies, and others they deemed unfit or racially inferior. Imperial Japan mirrored the Nazis and killed at least the same number of non-combatants during its eight-year rampage in Asia. (Is there a day honoring these murdered Asians?) Smaller mass murders also have occurred in Africa (Rwanda) and Southeast Asia (Cambodia).

The big-genocide masters of the 20^th century – Mao, Stalin, and their successors – never seem to get their due. Their regimes each arbitrarily killed about 60 million human beings, making Hitler and his murderous followers look like bumbling and underachieving amateurs. These c. 120 million executions surely have been marked and condemned by many nations of the world, but there were no Nuremberg-like trials for Stalin’s aged lieutenants and legatees when the USSR vanished, and Mao died in his bed, neither he nor his lieutenants, legatees, or executioners facing justice. Indeed, the United States and its Asian and European allies have not only ignored the thoroughly documented, seven-decade-old Chinese charnel house – save for boiler-plate calls for “human rights” in China – but they have lavishly assisted China to become a world-class economic and military power. (Are there days set aside to honor those murdered by Stalin, Mao, and their successors?)

Amidst the mass murders of the 20^th and now 21^st centuries, however, no people have suffered more from the phenomenon of arbitrary mass murder than the citizens of the United States. Since the installation of the natural successor to the Nazis’ anti-human Nuremberg Laws, in the form of the Supreme Court’s decuple-holocaust-producing Roe-v-Wade decision in 1973, more than 60 million innocent Americans have been murdered in the womb. (2) And these days, we are seeing the natural successor to Roe-v-Wade in the laws of seven states that sanction the murder of Americans as they are being born, or just after.

We Americans, as result, have more than enough to reason to designate a day of commemoration for the decuple-holocaust we have lived through over the past 46 years. Our 60 million arbitrary murders are a match for any of history’s other leading mass-murdering outfits. Indeed, no one but Mao and Stalin can hold a candle to the record accumulated by the United States via the scalpels and surgical scissors of the American Medical Association. Why just imagine for a moment that,

–The United States, using its own Nuremberg law called Roe-v-Wade, has murdered 86 times more American innocents than the number of U.S. military personnel who have been killed in combat all of the republic’s wars. (60 million to 700,000)

–America has out-killed Hitler and the Nazis by a ratio of 10 American innocents to one Jewish innocent. (60 million to 6 million)

–The United States has murdered a number of American innocents that is three times greater than the total number of civilian and military deaths in World War I. (60 million to 20 Million) (3)

–America has killed innocents in numbers that match – and now probably surpass — all of the civilian and military deaths in World War 2. (60 million to c. 60 million) (4)

–The United States has killed more than 300 times the number of innocents that were killed by the 1945 nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. (60 million to c. 200,000) (5)

All told, only the United States can match the mammoth holocaustian achievements of Stalin and Mao, and, now that the USSR is gone, Mao’s successors are America’s only real competitor in the field of exterminating innocents. Why should this staggeringly bloody American accomplishment go without recognition or commemoration?

I would propose, then, that the Congress officially designate January 22^nd – the day Roe-v-Wade was decided by the Supreme Court — as America’s official “Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day”. It would be a day of reflection, solemnity, and deep shame for Americans, who have thus far failed to stop the unprecedented slaughter, and now see that the process of annihilation begun in 1973 is progressing to the murder of the just born and the dismembering of these dead Americans so that their well-developed body parts can be sold for profit. It also will be day of wonder, a wonder focused on why most of those Americans who mourn their own losses on their own “Holocaust Day” can, at the same time, be full-throated, whole-hearted, and rhetorically vicious defenders of laws that authorized the murder of 60 million fellow Americans, and made the republic’s Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day a necessity. One can only conclude that, for those phony mourners, the public use of the phrases “never again” and “never forget” are simply theatrical, and so amount to meaningless cant meant to keep cultivating guilt in Americans and to extort foreign aid for Israel from the Congress.

This day of commemoration would be not a holiday, but rather a day that our ancestors called a “Day of Public Humiliation, Prayer and Fasting”. On 12 August 1861, four months after the civil war began, for example, the unchurched but hardly atheist Abraham Lincoln issued a proclamation calling for a day of “public humiliation, prayer and fasting” on which, he said, it would be “peculiarly fit” for Americans “to recognize the hand of God in this terrible visitation, and in sorrowful remembrance of our own faults and crimes as a nation and as individuals to humble ourselves before Him, and to pray for His mercy.” Lincoln’s day of “public humiliation, prayer and fasting” was conducted on 26 September 1861. (6) Lincoln, in essence, believed that all Americans, by their deeds, words, and failure to act to end festering national problems, had contributed to bringing on the war.

Lincoln’s day of humiliation – and others he declared during the war – did not end the war as quickly as the president desired. It continued until 9 April 1865, just before his death. In the weeks preceding his assassination, Lincoln, in his second inaugural address, suggested that the blood-filled catastrophe Americans had brought onto themselves had run a course that the divinity had intended it to follow. “The Almighty has His own purposes,” Lincoln said on 4 March 1865,

 “Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!” If we shall suppose that American Slavery is one of those offences which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South, this terrible war, as the woe due to those by whom the offence came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a Living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope — fervently do we pray — that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether” (7)

A final thought on commemorating Decuple-Holocaust Remembrance Day. Over time, memories fade and attention wanders, and so some more substantial, visible, and enduring item would be a valuable means of making sure, as the saying of some goes, that the phrases “never forget” and “never again” remain strongly, honestly, and forever in the hearts and minds of those Americans who at last resolved to act in a manner, to paraphrase Mr. Lincoln, that ensures this “mighty scourge of Americans murdering innocents may speedily pass away.”

Whether a sizeable statute, a large mural, or a memorial like that of Mr. Lincoln, it must not be a fixture that seeks to comfort or promote forgiveness, but rather one that immediately reminds the viewer of the murderous horror that was once commonplace in the republic, and visually warns him or her of the eternally true fact that demented and worthless human beings have always walked the earth, still do, and have often gained arbitrary power over populations. On this issue, I lean toward a good-sized mural picturing Mao, Stalin, and Hillary Clinton joyfully striding — home at last, you know — toward a rapturous welcome at the mouth of hell, the perimeter of which is surrounded by a crowd of death-wielding American medical doctors, murderous feminists, pro-choice Jewish-Americans, and pro-choice Christians – priests, ministers, bishops, popes, and laity like Biden and Pelosi – individuals of a kind that surely must be among that abode’s most desired, respected, and honored inhabitants. The impact of seeing such a mural, and knowing that it presents an irrefutable truth, would be a fearsome warning, one not soon to be forgotten.

With the mass murdering ended, the prospect of retribution for the republic would still remain. If Mr. Lincoln believed that the republic’s unprecedented suffering in lives, limbs, treasure, and ruined land and cities was divine retribution for the holding of four million black slaves, what might the future divine penalty be on the same republic for allowing the murder of 60 million innocent Americans? That is a question whose answer may be pondered with some discomfort.

–Endnotes:

–1.) https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/decuple

–2.) https://www.lifenews.com/2018/01/18/60069971-abortions-in-america-since-roe-v-wade-in-1973/

–3.) http://www.centre-robert-schuman.org/userfiles/files/REPERES%20%E2%80%93%20module%201-1-1%20-%20explanatory%20notes%20%E2%80%93%20World%20War%20I%20casualties%20%E2%80%93%20EN.pdf

–4.) https://www.nationalww2museum.org/students-teachers/student-resources/research-starters/research-starters-worldwide-deaths-world-war

–5.) http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/MED/med_chp10.shtml

–6.) https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1801-1900/president-lincolns-fast-11630524.html

–7.) https://cdn.loc.gov/service/mss/mal/436/4361300/4361300.pdf