Michael Scheuer | Non-Intervention

“For in the upshot,” the Roman historian Livy wrote, “liberty has come to mean at Rome, that a man respects neither senate nor magistrates, nor laws, nor ancestral customs, nor institutions of the fathers, nor military discipline.” Replace the word “Rome” with the term “Washington, DC”, and you have much of the cause for the republic’s steadily collapsing constitutional system.

The lawlessness of contemporary America has been a topic often raised in this space. But these past weeks have so brightly underscored that lawlessness that it can only be assumed that the Democrats deem themselves prepared for the civil war they so badly want to cause. Well perhaps they are, but I find it hard to believe. Their direct forebearers — the champions of slavery, secession, and civil war — also thought they were ready for war and even boasted that one of them could “kill ten” of their foes. That boast proved ill-founded.

The current Democrats’ judgment in this regard is no doubt based on the Republican establishment’s decades-long record of lame responses and supine acquiescence to their flamboyant lawlessness. With barely a whimper, the Republicans have never stood their ground to defeat one of the Democrats’ unrelenting attacks on the law and the Constitution. In just the past decade we have seen multiple criminal and, in the case of Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and their pack of fellow rabid rats, probably treasonous acts. All of these perpetrators remain walking about, spending their ill-gotten gains, and smirking at all U.S. citizens who obey and believe in obeying the law.

Among the most recent Democratic crimes to which the Republicans have not aggressively sought to apply the law are:

–Obama’s IRS spying on and persecuting American conservative organizations to tip elections in the Democrats’ favor.

–Holder’s DOJ refusing to prosecute Black Panthers who harassed and threatened white voters on election day.

–Hillary Clinton deliberately compromising classified material via a private unsecured server, a tool on which she installed a feature that send a copy of each document – incoming and outgoing — to her paymasters in Beijing.

–Obama, other Cabinet members, senior officials, and probably Brennan and Clapper used pseudonyms for conducting correspondence with Hillary through her compromised server. As a result, they knowingly broke the espionage laws and aided Hillary’s transfer of classified material to China and any other country that could afford to hire an amateur, teenage hacker and task him to attack the unsecured server.

–Obama illegally raiding the funds of other government agencies to pay for his parasitic health care program, unconstitutionally amending congressional legislation to suit his desires, and refusing to enforce immigration and border-control laws.

–Hillary Clinton arranging the murder of the U.S. ambassador and his security team in Tripoli to prevent exposure of her and Obama’s program to run guns to the Islamic State, and then lying about it, and, months later, dismissing the episode and the American deaths as no longer being important or relevant.

–Obama and his senior intelligence officials – Brennan and Clapper – lying about the imminence of the North Korean nuclear threat. They assured the nation that Pyongyang would not have a useable weapon for several years, and then suddenly revealed the sky was falling as soon as Trump was elected. Q: Why do you think Obama warned Trump that North Korea was the biggest problem he had? A: Because he and his administration had lied to Americans about the advanced state of development of the North Korean weapon.

–This point is a confident speculation. But collapse from a two-year period before Pyongyang would have a nuclear weapon and an ICBM to deliver it, to a stage of an imminent and then quickly demonstrated threat is extraordinarily unusual on the issue of nuclear-weapons development by rogue states. The technology; the talent, experience, and intuition of the veteran military and intelligence personnel tracking and analyzing the development; and the top priority and ample funding assigned to determining the pace of development all but assure that estimates of when North Korea would become a nuclear threat to the United States would not collapse from two years to right now. Bush and Cheney seem to have lied about Saddam having nuclear weapons; Obama and his criminal gang appear to have lied about when North Korea would have them.

–Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazil, Hilary Clinton, and John Podesta apparently arranged the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich, after he leaked DNC e-mails to Wikileaks.

–Debbie Wasserman Schultz facilitated the successful espionage campaign conducted against the U.S. Congress by the Pakistani Awan brothers.

–The Democratic governors of New York and California, and the Democratic mayors of multiple major cities — including New York, Chicago, and San Francisco — are refusing to obey federal laws meant to protect the security of the nation and the safety of the citizenry. In so doing, they are expanding lawlessness, abetting killers of American citizens, and shredding the republic’s social cohesion. In essence, these Democrats have revived the doctrine of nullification —  the claim that states can nullify federal laws they oppose — that was designed by John C. Calhoun, a South Carolinian who served as Democratic senator, vice-president, and secretary of  war. Calhoun’s doctrine was  supported by those who eventually formed the Confederate States of America. Calhoun also was a champion of slavery, which he described as a “positive good”.  The Democrats’ authoritarianism and eagerness to enslave people never, ever changes.

–Obama, Hillary, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Mueller, Strozkh, Lisa Page, Valarie Jarrett, Rosenstein, Susan Rice, John Kerry, myriad State Department officials that Secretary Pompeo has inexplicably yet to can, and the premier intelligence organizations of, at least, the UK, Australia, and perhaps Israel cooperated to try to defeat candidate Trump. They then conspired to try to stage a coup – indeed, a war against the republic — that would negate a legitimate presidential election, as well as overthrow the president and administration that election produced. For the latter action, the U.S. citizens named above merit indictment, trial, and conviction for treason – by either civil or military courts — and then the execution warranted by that conviction. In passing, it must be assumed that Senator Feinstein will at some point be fitted for the same noose for accommodating a Chinese spy and facilitating his activities for at least 20 years.

If any more impetus is needed to be prepared to give the Democratic Party the civil war it is seeking, it is the farce surrounding Judge Kavanaugh’s hearings. In many ways, the treatment of Kavanaugh should be seen as a direct attempt to invalidate the most indispensable tenet of U.S. law and legal tradition, namely, that every U.S. citizen is innocent until proven guilty. The Democrats’ argument is basically that which they have used to defend the criminal and traitor Hillary Clinton: anything a woman says is true and those she attacks are unquestionably guilty as charged, even if the woman cannot provide a shred of evidence to support her accusations or defend her actions.

Ms. Blasey Ford wandered into the hearing room, after consulting with her California “beach people”, to claim the nominee had sexually assaulted her 36 years ago. She could not, however, name the place, day, time, or any events that occurred in the time frame of the supposed incident. During her testimony – which those who think or pretend to believe women are superior creatures and incapable of lying have daftly called “compelling” – Ms. Blasey Ford cried but produced neither tears, nor red eyes, nor a need for a Kleenex; moved ably from being choked-up to giggling like a pre-teen; and repeatedly changed the tone of her voice from that of a mindless Valley girl, to that of a dramatic Hollywood victim, to that of a well-rehearsed and veteran liar. The latter after all is the traditional role of a leftist professor. Quite simply, if Ford had been questioned in the manner Kavanaugh was she would have been exposed as the unscrupulous conniver, lying fraud, and terminal adolescent that she is.

No matter that all of those people she claimed were witnesses to the event have sworn it did not happen; that Kavanugh made a highly credible argument that correctly identified the Democrats’ obvious conspiracy to destroy him as a means of undermining Trump; or that the Democrat’s production of two other so-called victims of Kavanaugh yielded two pathetic women who are transparently mentally ill, or liars, or Democratic Party employees, or all three, the Kavanaugh nomination was delayed for another week, but more likely the process has no end in sight.

And if this not enough of a demolition of the American justice system, the FBI was assigned the task of investigating the already proven false accusations of the insipid Blasey Ford. The FBI? Really? For more than two years the FBI and the Department of Justice have shown themselves – from top to bottom – to be an unbelievably corrupt, and a completely partisan, wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.

With the Democrats irrefutably showing that they, their tech-giant allies, and their blowhard billionaire clowns Bloomberg and Steyer mean to remove the Trump and his administration, and then shackle the deplorables into a state of slavery in which their civil liberties would truncated to the point of extinction, one can only conclude that they want a war to the knife, a bloody civil war.

As said above, this elitist alliance of vermin think they can win such a contest. I think not. But who knows. The best advice seems to be to vote for Trump’s agenda in November’s mid-terms and thereby allow President Trump a little more time to reinvigorate the Constitution – civil and/or military – by properly and severely applying the rule of law.

The Democrats, however, might not wait. If they are ready to begin the fight, then the words of an American patriot denote the proper course of action. “Stand your ground,” Captain John Parker told his militiamen at Lexington green early on 19 April 1775. ‘Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here.”

The image below is of what seems to be a genuine British GCHQ document, dated 17 November 2016. It is taken from the always careful and accurate “Still Report”. The admirable Mr. Bill Still posted it on 14 February 2018, and it can still be found at: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22still+report%22+gchq.

I urge you to view that splendid video for yourselves, as the document makes a hash out of the oft-repeated lie that only the retired MI6 agent Steele was in the Democrats’ pay. It turns out Obama had one the core components of the UK intelligence community working against Trump.

The document clearly shows that Obama — through Susan Rice — is asking GCHQ to “continue” its SIGINT collection against Mr. Trump, which began in September, 2016. Indeed, Obama and Rice specifically are asking for a “renewal” of the program. GCHQ is to continue its Trump collection after candidate Trump became the President-elect. In other words, President Obama requested the aid of a foreign power to spy on President-elect Trump with the goal of invalidating a legitimate election and overthrowing the president it produced.

What word comes to mind when a sitting American President seeks the aid of a foreign power to help overthrow an election, the President-elect, and the incoming administration? The word that comes to my mind is “treason”.  Apparently that word came to General Washington’s mind, too, in similar circumstances. Writing in December, 1778, Washington said that American traitors were working with the British Army to destroy the new republic, that they were numerous, and that they must be lethally handled.

“It is much to be lamented that each State, long ’ere this, has not hunted them down as the pests of Society, & the greatest enemies we have, to the happiness of America. I would to God that one of the most attrocious in each State was hung in Gibbets, up on a gallows five times as high as the one prepared by Haman—No punishment, in my opinion, is too great for the Man, who can build “his greatness upon his Country’s ruin.” (1)

What better description could there be of Obama than one of “the greatest enemies we have”? And who, pray tell, better merits a trial for treason, conviction, and then a date with “a gallows five times as high as the one prepared by Haman”?

–Endnote:

1.) https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-18-02-0452

–I apologize for the imperfect quality of the image below. I had to take it in two screen shots and then try to meld them into one. As you will note, I did not fully succeed in that attempt.

The “allies”, it is always the “allies”. We must defend them, we must politically support them, we must send our soldier-children to die for them, and we must spend U.S. taxpayer money to make up for the refusal of the “allies” to pay for their own defense.  And for our efforts we get what?

We get the “allies” deliberate cooperation with and support for the Obama regime’s comprehensive and illegal operation to subvert the presidential campaign of Republican candidate Trump, and then to overthrow President Trump’s legitimately elected administration. The known, slug-like “allies” involved in this operation are – so far – Britain, Australia, and Israel. How about them apples? I wonder what the governments of these three countries are doing to subvert their own political/electoral systems and the civil liberties of their citizens.

We also get John Brennan, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, and – since the activities continued after Trump’s inauguration – possibly DNI Dan Coats coordinating this foreign intervention to overthrow the U.S. domestic political system and the presidency of Donald Trump. The lieutenants of these officials also must be presumed to be players in this deliberate subversion. The knowledge and exposure-to-prosecution of these lieutenants are, of course, keys to discovering how broad and deep the rot of disloyalty is in the key components of the U.S. intelligence community. We are already getting a good look at the startling depth and breadth of this disloyal rot in the U.S. Civil Service via the current series of excellent, under-cover video reports by Project Veritas.

It also is highly likely that – besides Obama, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, and Valerie Jarrett — leading U.S. media personalities, their journals and television programs, and senior Democratic U.S. senators and representatives – especially those who are Jewish-Americans – were knowledgeable of and involved in this clear effort to subvert the American republic. Recall Senator Shumer’s warning that the intelligence community will “get Trump.” Shumer’s threat, of course, was seconded and verified by Clapper, Mudd, and Brennan. Well, each of those base cretins ought to know.

This subversive gang wanted to replace Trump’s administration with the authoritarian, racist, Obama-like, and Bill of Rights-destroying regime of Hillary Clinton. How dear and probably bloody would have been the cost to patriotic and pro-Trump U.S. citizens and their children if the intervention of America’s “closest allies” had succeeded in helping the Democrats and disloyal Jewish-Americans to defeat or evict Trump? That cost beggars the imagination and ought to make trigger-fingers itchy.

President Trump should release all the documents he judges to be pertinent as soon as possible, without redactions, and including those that prove our closest “allies” are vermin of a type identical to that which runs the Democratic Party and the mainstream media. He also should have the loyal parts of the U.S. military secure an ample supply of sturdy rope so as to be ready for the definitive remedial activities which must come at the hands of either the legitimate national government’s judiciary or – failing that – the armed citizenry.

And, in passing, given that the UK government intervened to subvert a U.S. presidential election, and then a U.S. administration, why we would not suspect that its claims that Russia’s agents poisoned two Russians staying in Britain were lies meant to subvert Trump’s non-interventionist, America First foreign policy; to put the Washington and Moscow at daggers-drawn; and to ensure U.S. dollars, equipment, and troops continue to flow into NATO to ward off a Russian threat that was fabricated by May’s government, other European NATO regimes, the Neocons, and the Israeli Firsters?

The European NATO countries and their U.S.-based accomplices, after all, know the simple truth; namely, that without a vastly overstated Russian threat, there is no reason for NATO, and without NATO they would be deprived of the defense-related gravy train that, since 1949, has been funded by U.S. taxpayers.

 “Toils, dangers, death itself carry their charms, when we brave them for the public good, and ennoble that being, which we generously sacrifice for the interests of our country.” David Hume (1)

Now, readers of this space will know that I have long argued that the United States is drifting toward civil war, and that those who want to preserve the republic devised by the Founders ought to be outspoken, well-armed, and ready to act if the national government either fails to eliminate the republic’s Democratic and socialist/communist enemies, or if it sides with them.

These Democrat-led enemies have, since election day in 2016, wasted two years of the republic’s life through the violence of the terrorist groups they support, the secessionist policies they practice under the guise of sanctuary-ism, and their always unanimous refusal to assist President Trump in trying to restore sustainable strength and vibrancy to the U.S. economy; to return sanity and constitutionality to the Supreme Court; to improve the lives, jobs, spirits, and incomes of the American people; and to deport all illegal aliens, most of whom contribute nothing to America but crime, social division, disease, violence, untold expense, and illicit left-wing or socialist/communist votes.

The Democrats in the House and the Senate – with aid from their brethren at the state and local levels, the media, the FBI, DoJ, and parts of CIA, much of the federal judiciary, and some Republicans — have robbed the republic of two years of its life, two years that have seen miraculous economic improvements due solely to the efforts of a man named Trump, his team, and the enthusiasm, patience, and loyalty of the Americans who elected them.

The enemies of the republic and its citizenry, however, have pledged to reverse all the good that has been achieved. They have stated that they will do so by raising taxes; by cozying-up even closer to the false-science based, global-warming extortionists at home and abroad; by restoring and increasing regulations on businesses; and by installing the other authoritarian, constitution-ending, and economy-wrecking policies that have been devised by such slithering maggots as Corey Booker, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren, as well as the additional perverse policy prescriptions that have been presented by the Democrats’ new generation of half-witted freaks, people like New York’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Florida’s Andrew Gillum.

In addition, the Democrats, the mainstream media, and the ripe-for-retribution masters of Silicon Valley have collaborated to censor and/or shutdown a large number of conservative and libertarian alternative-media outlets so as to cut down the flow of accurate data to the tens of millions of patriots who are Trump supporters. As this censorship proceeds, the Democrats and their allies also are bombarding those to whom the truth has been denied with the fabricated, anti-America swill published by the New York Times and the Washington Post, and the stinking, Obama-like, and America-hating vomit that flows so easily from the pestilential mouths of Pelosi, Schumer, Cuomo, Durbin, Sanders, Bloomberg, and Warren.

Last weekend, I watched an excellent video in which the commentator, at one point, compared the intense anti-Trump and anti-America censorship campaign being conducted by the alliance of Democrats, mainstream media, and the tech gangsters to the burning of books by the Nazis. I thought that an apt comparison, but must say that the U.S.-based entities really are far worse than Adolph and his crowd.

In the first place, the Nazi-wannabe Democrats already have executed nearly 65 million innocent Americans. The Hitler-led Nazis executed only a paltry 6 million innocents. The Democrats, in fact, make the Nazis look like pretty small beer when it comes to conducting genocide.

In the second place, the Nazis burned books to deny German citizens access to writers and information that ran counter to their ideology; their bonfires were frequent, blazed brightly, and consumed much material. But there were other sources of information that for a time evaded Nazi censorship: books that were shelved in large and small home libraries; radio and shortwave broadcasts; all sorts of views and news published or broadcast in adjacent countries and so were available to German readers and listeners, as well as to traveling Germans; and in letters from the foreign acquaintances with whom Germans corresponded.

Today’s censorship of American conservatives, libertarians, and patriots is electronic and quiet, but it is still a very Nazi-like book-burning by the Democratic and media/tech elites, all of whom have greatly sharpened their authoritarian intentions and skills since they destroyed Judge Robert Bork and tried to electronically lynch Justice Clarence Thomas. Indeed, they almost certainly are the authors of a more complete denial of timely information to their domestic opposition than that which the always efficient Nazis were able to manage.

This is the case not only because the pro-America alternative media can be silenced in its entirety with a flip of a switch by the malicious tech moguls, but because almost all of the U.S. and European mainstream media, in the midst of widespread and growing censorship, is every bit as vile, deceitful, propagandistic, and loyal to the Democratic Party and the other enemies of liberty, as were the German media arms — which were built and then guided by Dr. Goebbels and his murderous enforcers — to Hitler and his Nazi Party.

It is almost humorous to reflect on the fact that, if alive today, Dr. Goebbels would be intensely jealous of the comprehensive evil that is being meted out by his obvious contemporary analogues, Zuckerberg, Dorsey, Bezos, Slim, et. al. And can it really be just a coincidence that Goebbels had the “Brown Shirts” to repress free speech and impose tyranny, while the Democrats, the media, and the tech gangsters have their own “Brown Berets” – as well as Antifa, BAM, and BLM – to do the same?

Goebbels also would be startled, and probably a bit bemused, by the fact that the much more comprehensive campaign of Nazi-like censorship and tyranny in the United States is being championed, orchestrated, and executed by many Israel-Firsters and Jewish-American leaders in Congress, the media, Hollywood, the universities, and the business community. An unrelenting aspiration to impose tyranny, it seems, makes for strange bedfellows. The next thing you know we will be hearing Beyonce, Streisand, Rihanna, and various foul-mouthed/tiny-brained rappers warbling Die Panzerlied, Die Wacht am Rhein, and, most especially the Horst-Wessel Lied all across the land.

Overall, it is clear that the Democrats, the mainstream media, and the Silicon Valley chiefs are intent on savaging the 1^st Amendment by censoring and then closing the alternative media outlets that are capable of providing accurate reporting about the current political, economic, and societal situations in the United States to those who legitimately elected Trump or who have come to his support since the inauguration. It also appears that Trump cannot yet force his administration and its law-enforcement agencies to end the growth of this widespread and unconstitutional oppression and then bring the purveyors of that oppression to book.

For Americans who are having their 1^st Amendment rights erased by this scurvy pack of U.S.-born Nazis, their response to the attacks they are under must be a steady courage, an outspoken opposition to tyranny, and a readiness to forcibly overthrow a Democratic victory in November. “Lastly, it is my fervent wish,” the great and incisive English republican John Milton told his fellow Englishmen in his Second Defense of the English People (1653),

“that you should not be afraid to listen either to truth or falsehood, of whatever description that may be; but that you should listen the least of all to those, who never fancy that themselves are free, unless they deprive others of their freedom; who labour at nothing with so much zeal and earnestness, as to enchain not the bodies only, but the consciences of their brethren; and to introduce into church and state the worst of all tyrannies – their own misshapen customs and opinions. May you ever take part with those, who think it just, that not their own sect or faction alone, but all citizens alike should have an equal right to be free.” (2)

Thusly, four-plus centuries ago,  John Milton described with extraordinary prescience and  precision the nature and intentions of the republic’s current Democratic, mainstream media, and tech enemies — all of which are, as the phrase goes, enemies of the people. These contemporary core components of America’s National Socialism are, indeed, groups “who never fancy that themselves are free, unless they deprive others of their freedom; who labour at nothing with so much zeal and earnestness, as to enchain not the bodies only, but the consciences of their brethren; and to introduce into church and state the worst of all tyrannies – their own misshapen customs and opinions.”

Today’s task for lovers of the republic, its history, traditions, and constitution, and their own personal liberty is, therefore, to get out and vote for Trump-supporting congressional candidates in November, and also to be ready to take up whatever tools they find available, and, under an appropriate battle flag, use them to utterly destroy the National Socialist tyrants if they they can fix the elections and win control of the Congress.

–Endnotes:

–1.) David Hume, “The Stoic,” in Eugene F. Miller, (Ed.). David Hume. Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc.,

–2.) See, John Milton. Aeropagitica and other Political Writings of John Milton. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc. 1999, pp. 407-48

Now that the funeral festival staged for John McCain has concluded, it is worth considering a couple of attendant issues.

The first is a question. Why were veterans’ organizations so insistent that the flag be flown at half-mast for McCain for multiple days? Yes, he was a veteran and a POW. He also consistently sought ever-larger appropriations for the Department of Defense. But in the ranks of today’s veterans there are an inordinate number of men and women who survived the unnecessary and interventionist wars that McCain relentlessly advocated and often caused. These men and women are also the comrades of the many thousands of Marines and soldiers who were killed, wounded, or maimed in those unnecessary wars, or who have killed themselves from the enduring, debilitating, and ultimately fatal impact of their military service.

These younger veterans know that they were sent to wars in which the republic did not have a dog in the fight; that they were sent to wars that their political leaders and generals were not going to allow them to win; and that it was people like McCain that drove a slow-motion, overseas U.S. military bloodbath for most of the past 30 years. One day at half-mast would have been more than enough – perhaps too much – to honor McCain as a former POW. He surely did not merit the four days of officially mandated grief, which was stage-managed by the bilateral and thoroughly Neocon political and media establishment. Their program was intentionally inflicted on veterans who suffered from the endless, always McCain-led war-making, as well as on the parents and families of those that McCain insisted be sent to their deaths in his always ego-satisfying but always unnecessary, useless, and unending wars.

The second issue lies in the nature of most of the crowd that filled the National Cathedral for McCain’s third – but not last – funeral service. Taken as a whole, those who filled the pews are the enemies of all Americans who value the lives of their soldier-children, who believe a war only ought to be fought in self-defense, and the growing numbers of those who are seeing the extraordinary costs in lives, limbs, treasure, and civil liberties that the political establishment’s post-1945 military interventionism abroad has yielded.

The elite crowd in the National Cathedral wept and spoke as if they were praising McCain, but the attendees were really there to praise interventionism and unnecessary wars, and to make an arrogant but – pray God — specious assertion that they are still in control the nation’s destiny. That assertion was their priority, and those attending the service did not care enough about honoring McCain’s memory – after all, he can no longer cause more wars – to prevent them from turning the occasion into an attack on the current president, the economic successes his team has scored, and the unnecessary wars he seems intent on gradually snuffing out. That this outrageously inappropriate, in-church, partisan political attack was led by McCain’s daughter suggests that more war is more important to these people than anything else, even the solemnity of the event and her Dad’s memory.

The final issue is a more hope than fact. It seems appropriate that McCain went to his reward just as an issue emerged that would have wet his war-mongering whistle. The media reports that the Russian and Iranian militaries are preparing to stage a campaign in the Idlib area of Syria, which is identified as the “last” Islamist stronghold in the country. This contention, of course, is the standard media/military/government lie; Islamist guerrilla groups remain present throughout both Syria and Iraq, and, although they solidly hold little ground, they are attacking in both countries, particularly in Iraq. Anyway, the reality is, for Americans, that it does not matter a whit whether Iranian and Russian forces are triumphant or are beaten like a drum. The outcome will be what it will be, and neither result will be any skin off the republic’s nose. The media also report that the coming campaign may create a “humanitarian disaster” in Idlib, a message that McCain and his war-adoring ilk loved to mix with their hatred of Russia, Iran, or any other of their endless enemies-of-the-day as a formula for forcing America into unnecessary wars.

Well, McCain is gone, and, so far, no other voice has replaced his as the major war-demanding advocate in Washington. One may yet arise, of course, on the issue of Idlib. But the fact remains – as it did when McCain was alive — that no American life or interest has been killed or damaged in Syria since the war began there in 2011, save for the losses caused by the unwise decisions to go there by several American journalists and NGO workers, and the national government’s mindless decision to uselessly risk of the lives of U.S. Marines and soldiers.

Overall, the destiny of Idlib, its combatants, and its people are a matter of supreme indifference to Americans, who will get along just fine no matter what happens Syria. If those war-mongers who attended McCain’s funeral service, and those who follow and support them, are concerned about Idlib, let them go there and participate in the fight. At the least, each should send a few million dollars of their spare and probably ill-gotten change to the inhabitants. Let them for once, put their own lives and money at risk, and leave the rest of the country alone.

Without McCain, the citizenry now has a chance to see the republic gradually return to sanity by becoming involved in wars only if its survival is at stake. Such wars will be few and far between, unless we are forced by the Democrats to fight a civil war here at home to preserve the republic they seek to destroy. No post-McCain military interventionist has the insulation from criticism that McCain had from being a former POW and from never letting anyone forget it. With his demise, perhaps President Trump, Senator Paul, and their lieutenants will be able to reteach the citizenry the worth and constitutional-appropriateness of an America First foreign policy in terms of preserving the lives, limbs, and minds of our soldier-children; accruing financial savings that fuel domestic infrastructure reconstruction and debt reduction, the full restoration of the civil liberties savaged by the national government since 9/11, and the reliable application in full of the 1^st, 2^nd, and 4^th Amendments for all citizens.

So often in life goodbyes are bittersweet, but today it seems there are particular goodbyes that are far more sweet than bitter.

–THE MAN:

–HIS LEGACY:

Sources:

McCain photo: https://www.ktts.com/news/local-news/missouri-leaders-share-reactions-to-john-mccain-passing

Arlington National Cemetery photo: https://people.howstuffworks.com/culture-traditions/national-traditions/arlington-national-cemetery-is-running-out-space.htm

What can one say about the U.S. general officer who said the following after President Trump correctly, and at long last, removed former CIA Director John Brennan’s security clearances.

“Few Americans have done more to protect this country than John. He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question, except by those who don’t know him. Therefore, I would consider it an honor if you would revoke my security clearance as well, so I can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency.”

Those words were spoken last week by dear, faux-noble Admiral William McRaven, a man who is identified in the media as the architect and leader of the “raid that killed bin Laden.” Funny, I would have thought the raid’s leader was the officer who commanded the attack team on the ground in Abbottabad – you know, where the danger was — not the officer who was heavily guarded by friendly forces in whatever headquarters he safely sat, drinking coffee, while the operation occurred.

Nonetheless, dear, self-promoting Admiral McRaven ought to be taken at his word, and the president should terminate his clearances. In fact, why should any retried U.S. general officer retain his or her clearances? The president should take away the clearances from all of them.

Indeed, why would any U.S. administration want the advice of any of America’s retired general officers, a band of arms-manufacturing company directors who share one central and shameful trait with all post-1945 generals; namely, not one of them has won a war in which America was involved. And, oddly, these men-of-constant-defeat are treated by the citizenry as demigods, even though they have willingly got our soldier-children killed and maimed in all the unnecessary wars they knowingly lost in the past seven decades. The public’s misplaced trust and respect ought to stop immediately, and heckling ought to commence whenever one of these wretched losers begins to speak.

Given this hard but true fact, one must ask the question: “Why has no U.S. general officer ever criticized a president who ordered them to war with no intention of winning it?” Are these general officers simply lovers of losing, is all their talk about caring for the lives of their men just hype, or have McRaven and the rest of his brother non-winners simply decided to speak-up now because Trump will knock them off their dependable, post-retirement corporate gravy trains if he continues to keep us out of new wars and seeks to limit our exposure to being drawn into wars for others. I believe it is the latter.

As for Brennan, no one will be able to find a professional and successful U.S. intelligence officer who would utter — without a gun to his head — the words: “Few Americans have done more to protect this country than John. He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question.” Brennan, dear unperceptive – or is it deceitful? — Admiral McRaven, is a duplicitous ass, whose career was made by lies and back-stabbing, kissing the butt of every intelligence officer, general, or politician for whom he worked, abusing his subordinates, and by his eager willingness to ensure that their interests and wallets, and never the republic’s security interests, always came first.

Indeed, dear, self-righteous Admiral McRaven, you would not have had to risk the lives of your men at Abbottabad in 2011 to kill bin Laden – if, in fact, you were concerned about their survival – if Brennan had not made sure he protected Saudi Arabia’s interests by siding with George Tenet, Bill Clinton, and Richard Clarke to prevent the United States from trying to kill bin Laden on any of the ten occasions, in 1997-1998, that were afforded them by the CIA officers risking their lives on the ground in South Asia.

I wonder, dear, showboating Admiral McRaven, if there is anything worse than a man like Brennan – who kept bin Laden alive, covered-up for Hillary’s murder of Americans in Benghazi, and helped Obama illegally fund the Iranian mullahs? If there is, it can only be you and so many of your war-losing band of brothers, men and women who always have their eyes on the main chance – riches from the arms-makers in retirement.

And, by the way, Admiral McRaven, I do know Brennan, and he is a lying, anti-American cur. And in my book, Admiral, so are you.

Last week, the Democrats and the media had their pitchforks, torches, and nooses out for FOX’s Laura Ingraham after she told the absolute truth; namely, most Americans dislike the republic-killing demographic changes that have and are being tyrannically forced on them by the bipartisan governing elite.

In other words, America’s Bolsheviks are now after Ms. Ingraham for telling the truth. This is, of course, the modus operandi always seen among the zombies, intellectuals, racists, murderers, and other half-baked people who refuse to think for themselves and have followed Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Hillary Clinton. Then, there also is that peculiar species of moron that follows the utterly nonsensical claim of Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and their ilk of mentally deranged diversity/multiculturalism mongers that “diversity makes us stronger”. Only a fool or a liar could say such a thing with a straight face, and only an idiot could think it true.

The fact is that Ms. Ingraham spoke the unquestionable truth and so it was unrecognizable to the mainstream media, huge numbers of millennials — thanks to their extortionate and useless educations — and, again, to the average Democrat, all of whom are dependably below average but more than adequate parrots.

The irrefutable fact is that the Democrats and most of the Republicans have presided over a hostile foreign invasion of the United States. They facilitated the invasion because it promised the former an endless supply of loyal ignoramuses for voters, and assured the latter an endless source of cheap labor. Both parties, of course, understood but chose to ignore the fact that the Founders had a built a republic that could only be maintained by a largely homogeneous population and one that was religiously inclined toward Protestant Christianity.

The Founders also believed that the foreigner who did not precisely fit the foregoing model could, albeit regrettably, be admitted — there was a lot of land to fill up, after all — but that they must be dispersed among the native population and educated in schools that taught them the country’s history, the English language, and their civil responsibilities. The Founders also warned against allowing immigrants to settle in groups, thereby forming closed communities that would not assimilate and would become hostile toward those that gave them a chance live in America. As always, the Founders were exactly correct. Our major cities now host such angry and armed anti-American enclaves.

How do we begin to end this decades long and entirely politician-created demographic shift toward awarding the United States the always-to-be resisted status as a Third World shithole? Well, here are a couple of sure-fire methods:

–1.) Voters must dismiss, with absolute finality, all politicians with plans to continue undermining the republic by implementing the policies attendant to the anti-American theories of diversity and multiculturalism. Such a rejection would have nothing to do with ethnicity, race, religion, or gender. It would be done because the concepts themselves are unimaginably stupid, elitist, and destructive. They were and are designed by Ivy League professors to help the Democrats destroy the American republic. Nothing, repeat, nothing, can restore our society’s cohesiveness, and begin to strengthen our gradually splintering Union, so long as additional immigrants and illegal aliens are admitted who do not intend to assimilate, and who the Democrats mean to be their party’s slave-voters and whom the Republicans want as cheap-laborers.

–2.) We must establish a requirement for a moderate English-speaking capability for anyone applying for permanent entry into the United States; those with the highest such capability should be placed at the head of the applicant line; and no immigrant should be made a naturalized citizen without passing a test that shows an English-language competence sufficient to use the language in all everyday activities conducted outside the home, especially in the workplace

This action would have the bonus of saving enormous amounts of educational funds by gradually returning  to the commonsense situation in which instruction in all schools is conducted only in English — save for the study of foreign languages — thereby ending the multi-lingual instruction that the Democrats have designed to prevent assimilation, keep everyday dealings between native-born Americans and immigrants difficult at best, and to maintain the party’s new slave plantations of frightened immigrants who are unable to understand and adapt to their new surroundings because they do not speak competent English. The Democrats and Republicans deliberately have made the republic a modern Babel from which they exploit immigrants for votes and labor, as well as make them the enemies of the native born. Mandatory English-for-all would level the economic, academic, political, and social playing fields for all legal Americans, and would return the republic to a rough linguistic homogeneity which is, of course, an important key to its survival and cultural renewal. 

–3.) We must also accept the fact that the U.S. Constitution’s provisions pertain only to U.S. citizens, and is meant solely to protect them, their liberty, and their republic. In other words, the Constitution cannot sanely be construed as applying and giving rights to any foreigner living outside sovereign U.S. territory, or of giving Americans the duty to feed, clothe, protect, fund, nurse-to-health, educate, rescue, or host any foreigners who claim such help as his right. Such actions are rightfully the work of religions, charities, rich Tech Giants (fat chance), but never that of the national government. The Constitution, in other words, belongs solely to Americans, and they and their elected representatives can use it in any manner that suits them and their republic’s needs, when it comes to devising policies dealing with foreigners located in foreign lands. The rest of the world’s views on the matter amount to irrelevant nattering to be listened to politely, and then entirely ignored.

Armed with this fact, U.S. citizens and their elected representatives also should ignore any federal judge who decides issues before him in a manner that is based on a belief that anything in the Constitution covers and protects non-U.S.-citizen foreigners living outside the United States.

If, for example, the citizenry wants to completely ban Muslim immigration for the next decade — after having grown weary of Muslims and their genital mutilation of young women, camps for training young children to shoot-up schools, wife beating, creating of armed enclaves in major cities, honor killings, acid throwing, armed attacks, and penchant for protecting Muslim murderers while they are planning to massacre non-Muslims — there is nothing in the Constitution that prevents such a ban on Muslim immigration. A judge who finds that there is, is an ass who was educated in fake law schools meant to destroy, Justice Ginsberg-like, the U.S. Constitution.

Likewise, there is nothing in the Constitution that can be construed so as to prevent Americans from deciding that would-be immigrants will not be admitted if they are diseased, mentally deranged, or illiterate. Americans also are not compelled by the Constitution to admit people who emanate from societies that work only because of systematic corruption, tribalism, misogyny, socialism, crime, or tyranny.  None of these traits stop at the border, and all would be imported by their carriers into the republic, where they would be injected into and then further corrupt its politics.

The Constitution authorizes only Americans to decide who is or is not welcome in their country. Such a decision belongs to a sovereign people and that, by definition, means that what U.S. actions the dung hill-dwelling leaders of the UN, the EU, and the Third World, as well as that damned Marxist Pope and the media, demand regarding the republic’s immigration policies do matter not a whit to the citizenry. In a short tweet, they all should be told to go pound sand.

Finally, while the greedy Republicans are complicit in this immigration disaster, the responsibility for prolonging, broadening, and sharpening its negative and destabilizing impact lies solely with the Democrats. In August, 1894, Theodore Roosevelt wrote that,

“No government that cannot command the respectful support of the best thinkers is in an entirely sound condition; but it is well to keep in mind the remark of Frederick the Great, that if he wished to punish a province, he would allow it to be governed by the philosophers. It is a great misfortune for the country when the practical politician and the doctrinaire have no point in common, but the misfortune is, if anything, greatest for the doctrinaire.” (1)

If here today, President Roosevelt would denounce the fact that his fellow citizens had permitted themselves to be governed by the Democrats’ crackpot philosophers since  Lyndon Johnson began his party’s war to destroy the middle class — black and white — and to build slave plantations of black voters bound to the party by the funds that the national government stole from black and white middle-class taxpayers and gave to those it trained to be dole-addicted. All of this was conducted under the leadership of Ivy League professors and the Democrats they educated, and they, too, have been at the helm of the diversity and multicultural doctrines that have made America the demographic nightmare it is today.

I have long held — and argued in this space — that the Democrats must be recognized as the party of the four S’s; that is, as the champions of slavery, secession, segregation, and socialism. Now they have won their fifth “S” by becoming the champions of making America a shit-hole via immigration.

So, today, the Democrats and their pet philosophers are slavers, secessionists, segregationists, socialists, and, shit-hole builders. If Roosevelt was correct, and in politics he usually was, they — those he called “doctrinaire” — will soon find a richly merited and, pray God, indictment-fueled misfortune catching up with them. Though rotting in prison until they die seems too good an end for them, I suppose you never get everything you want. 

And Roosevelt, by the way, surely would ask why his fellow citizens have tolerated the Democrats’ tyranny for so long without an appropriate and punishing response. “There must be sincere purpose to push forward and remedy wrong,” he wrote in June, 1918, “but there must be firm refusal to submit to the leadership of the criminal fringe or the lunatic fringe.” (2)  That refusal, Roosevelt could be reassured, will definitely be felt by the Democratic criminals and lunatics if their indictments do not soon flow forth.

Endnote:

–1.) https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1894/08/the-college-graduate-and-public-life/304483/

–2.) Quoted in Daniel Ruddy. Theodore the Great. Conservative Crusader. Washington, DC: Regenery History, 2016, p. xiv

I have been on a two-week hiatus courtesy of Godaddy’s decision to kill my blog because, they claim, I was “spamming and abusive”. In the e-mail announcing the blog’s demise, Godaddy added that they did not want to hear from me because their diktat could not be questioned by me or anyone else.

Now, those who have read my work well know that my computer skills are marginal. I generally break the key used to open a can of spam, and so electronically spamming people is, for me, a complete impossibility. As to abuse, the Lords of Godaddy seem to have have missed the vile, threatening, and half-baked messages sent to me by hundreds of semi-literates via twitter and as comments to my last three blogs. I answered many of the blog comments with disdain and sarcasm, all of which were mild in comparison to the incoming.

Still, the destruction of my blog site by what seem to be aspiring communists at Godaddy has been useful in helping me to understand – first-hand – the power of such tech giants to destroy the constitutional rights of targeted individuals who annoy them and their Democratic partners — or is it puppets? It also provided an invaluable insight into what the tech world views as the proper role for all non-elite Americans in the world they are building and mistakenly think they will survive to see.

Godaddy’s actions came after my last three blogs. In the first, I argued – using the impeccable authority, on this point, of John Milton, Algernon Sydney, John Dickinson, and Thomas Jefferson — that if Trump cannot/will not enforce the law and arrest, try, incarcerate, and, if the law allows, execute those who believe and act as if they are above it, American citizens will have to do their duty by using their weapons to snuff out the authors of tyranny; namely, those who neither enforce or obey the law and those who support them. This seems to have worried many of my critics, not to mention the Godaddy commies-in-waiting, and left them confused as to whose was – and is – calling for civil war.

On that score, I stand not as an inciter, but rather as the incited and as a responder to the clear threats of civil war that are rampant among those in the Democratic Party; namely, the anti-free-speech mainstream media; the academy; the financial and technology industries; the much-aggrieved and always badly educated Democratic terrorists in Antifa, BAM, MS-13, and BLM; the unable-to-teach, teachers’ unions; the minority groups, feminists, felonious illegal aliens, and sexual deviants who demand legal preference; and the society-murdering advocates of diversity and multiculturalism. Those are the sources that are solely responsible for the civil war that is nearing.  That they are ignorant, or feign ignorance, of that fact will add to their surprise if the time for Rob Reiner’s war comes and so many of them find themselves reaping the armed whirlwind they and ol’ Rob have sown.

In the second blog, I made reference to the revelatory nature of the now ongoing events in South Africa, where the government – made up of Mandela’s naturally terrorist spawn – is either directing or turning a blind eye to a campaign by black thugs to kill white, usually Christian South African farmers. The black murderers want to permanently evict the white farmers from the land they own, and, of course, to simultaneously enjoy a merry bit of blood sport. Apparently not satisfied with having destroyed the South African economy, Mandela’s murderous heirs are now actively allowing the murder of the farmers on which all of the country depends on for food. Underlying the planned and casual nature of the regime’s murder-condoning policy, was the silence of Barack Obama on the issue. On the day before I wrote, Obama was in South Africa giving a narcissistic, two-hour speech to praise the communist Mandela and to then talk endlessly about himself, how he feels, what he thinks, what people pain him, and what he plans to do. He mentioned not one word about his hosts’ campaign of murder against white farmers, which was not unusual as he always has cared about murders only if the murdered were blacks or emanated from one of his party’s slave plantations. In the piece, I also noted that it is interesting that the only world leader who is seeking to aid the white South African farmers is President Putin by allowing them to emigrate to Russia and, on arrival, receive substantial and free homesteads that they can work to make a living. I also gave a well done to Putin, and I give it again here, and give it enthusiastically.

The third essay dealt with the frenzy about Russia’s supposed meddling in U.S. elections that is being whipped up by the Democrats, the Neocons, and their media shills. Such meddling by Moscow is a nothing-new event that has been occurring since Lenin ordered the massacre of the Czar and his family in an Ekaterinburg basement. I noted in the piece that there is no reason to believe anything that comes out of the FBI or the CIA on this issue as, after two years of investigation (presumably grounded on the threat the FBI and CIA claimed to exist), Mueller and his 17 lying Democrats have not found any perpetrators of the meddling whose guilt or innocence can be decided in a court of law. Perhaps sensing that the citizenry was not buying their unsubstantiated claims, the Intelligence Community’s Grandees arranged to have Facebook race to capitol hill and report that the nasty Russian meddlers had placed 32 pages of diabolical material on their platform that had to be removed from the Facebook system. Now, why would anyone with a lick of commonsense believe anything that a Facebook employee had to say about anything? Facebook is an organization that would have made Joe Stalin drool, stealing personal data from its clients and selling it to buyers – private- and public-sector – who will use it to manipulate or track or frame those clients. But like all of the tech giants, Facebook is all about violating the Bill of Rights and eventually destroying the republican system it is mean to protect.

In the same essay, I also added that it seemed ridiculous to worry about Russian meddling in U.S. elections, when the governing elite condones and profits from their not-so-secret status as the paid assets of Jewish-American leaders and organizations and Israel, the former’s country of first allegiance. Indeed, it would only take Mueller and his band of Hillary-acolytes two days to discover that three-quarters and probably more of the U.S. Congress, and an untold number of senior U.S. civil servants and general officers are the willing and paid agents of a foreign power named Israel. Any national discussion of the issue of prolonged and devastating foreign intervention in U.S. politics, elections, and media can only start in one place, and that is in Israel. By-the bye, is it not odd that President Trump’s attackers are demanding that he provide the specific content of his one-on-one discussions with President Putin – which are the result of a legal meeting of the U.S. and Russian presidents, and which was the duty of both – but not once in my lifetime has anyone asked for the specific content of the private, unsupervised, and so illegal one-on-one discussions that have occurred in past decades between the Israeli prime minister of the day and U.S. politicians, civil servants, and opinion-shapers, cretins such as Schumer, Nadler, Joe Lieberman, Bill Kristol, John Bolton, Wolfowitz, Graham, McCain, Behner, Feinstein (when not busy selling-out America to China), Wolf Blitzer, Rahm Emanuel, and, literally, many hundreds of others. Why the secrecy? Why the lack of interest in finding what game is afoot? Well, because every time an Israeli prime minister shows up in the United States it signals the start of the treason season.

I have nattered on here longer than I intended. To sum up, I found my unexpected hiatus to be useful in learning that the tech giant Godaddy – like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter – fully condones and, indeed, advocates and is working for:

–1.) The curtailment and eventual abolition of the U.S. Bill of Rights, or at least, at this stage, the 1^st, 2^nd, and 4^th amendments. That is, tyrannical rule over an enslaved U.S. citizenry is not only okay with, but is preferred by Godaddy.

–2.) Godaddy is delighted with the on-going murder of white Christian South African farmers by black, Antifa-like South African thugs and the Mandela-ized South African regime, and does not want to slow down the murder-spree there by allowing Americans to learn about its existence. Maybe the tech giants could help to hunt down the white South African farmers just as some of them are helping Beijing to eradicate Chinese political dissidents and Chinese Christians and Muslims, – usually by killing them and then removing and selling their organs. Obama might also send some of his Antifa thugs there to be trained by the black South African murderers of white farmers.

–3.) Godaddy’s commissars are comfortable with the plan for war with Russia that is now being stirred up largely by the lies of the Tech giants, the Neocons, Muellers’ show trials, much of the Congress, members of the CIA and most of the FBI, and the anti-Trump mainstream media. They also seem satisfied with EU leaders who are stoking the threat of war with Russia so that the nearly-moribund NATO alliance again appears necessary, which means, in turn, that U.S. taxpayers will continue to be exploited to pay for Europe’s defense.

–4.) Godaddy has no concerns about the disloyal and subversive activities of Jewish-American leaders/organizations and Israeli leaders and their intervention in U.S. elections. They also support that gang’s purchase of U.S. politicians and civil servants to ensure the U.S. taxpayer gets bilked for billions in annual aid to Israel, and so that those taxpayers’ children always can be used as cannon fodder in wars that are in Israel’s, not America’s, interests.

Maybe I should pay Godaddy a fee for so thoroughly teaching me these deeply held anti-Americans realities about itself during my summer hiatus? Nah, learning  firsthand that Godaddy is led, managed, and censored by pro-tyranny, leftist shitbirds only confirmed what I had suspected, and what was reaffirmed yesterday with the tech giants’ banning of Alec Jones.

Jones has three times more subscribers than CNN has daily viewers. Ten million people a day in America and around the world watch one or more parts of Jones’s programming. Jones was banned for “hate speech”, which is a brain-dead and meant-to-censor concept that is championed only by the Tech gangsters, fools of Reiner’s ilk, disloyal Israel-Firsters, and other enemies of the republic and free speech, all of whom specialize in the type of speech they are accusing Jones of using. The most important takeaway from Jones’s banning is that the four bastards who head the four tech giants have decided that 70 million weekly American and international viewers cannot watch — or listen to — anything that annoys them; the Democrats, pedophiles, and other sexual deviants; the feminists, the Hollywood vermin, and the abortionists; or the communists, Democratic Party-funded terrorists, or any of the other of the human garbage that today occupies the political left and does not know how to use in-door plumbing.

In banning Jones, those on the left again have proven that they are the ones who are seeking to provoke a civil war. My own hunch is that if their provocations work, they will enjoy the reality of war with considerably less gusto than they did while so loudly calling for and provoking it.

“The expropriation of land without compensation is envisaged as one of the measures that we will use to accelerate redistribution of land to black South Africans.”

President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, 21 February 2018 (1)

In world that is fast resolving itself into a sharp confrontation between globalism, and the military tyranny at its core, and a rising tide of nationalism, it is unusual to see a man do the right thing, even when he knows the rest of the world will ignore or revile him for it. But in one quick and generous action, President Putin and Russia appear prepared to do more to protect Christians than any Western leader has done in the past half-century. At the same time, Putin’s plan cannot but help but aid Russia’s agricultural sector.

Putin and his government have offered free homesteads of significant size, for farming or husbandry, to 15,000 white, Christian South African farmers and their families whose lives, culture, wealth, and children are now being murdered by blacks with the unofficial approval of the government of barbarians that now rules South Africa. Putin and Russia will receive no praise from the Marxist Pope of Rome, the irrelevant Archbishop of Canterbury, or any other effete Christian chieftain, nor from any anti-white/anti-Christian European or American political leader.

Indeed, the scourge of the United States, and the world’s racist-in-chief, Barack Obama spoke in South Africa this week and never mentioned the plight of the soon-to-be-murdered Boer farmers and their families. In an enormously long speech, Obama turned night to day by describing the “successes” Mandela and his successors have scored, successes that amount to economic collapse and an open season for hunting white humans. As always, Obama has no trouble whatsoever with the murdering of whites. In gratitude for his silence on the issue, perhaps the rotten Mandela-spawn that now govern South Africa took Obama on a hunt for some white Boers during his visit.

This execrable, Obama-led class of leaders were betting that the white South African farmers would surrender and go to their and their children’s death in a cowardly silence, and that no world leader would focus on the racist eradication of whites that is being condoned by the black butchers who rule South Africa. They won their bet on Western leaders; save for Putin, not one major world leader has tried to focus attention on the blacks-led, government-acquiesced-in murder crusade against white South African farmers. But the Boer farmers and their families will never surrender and die in silence and cowardice, ask the British queen about her forebearers’ prolonged, agonizing, well-merited, and highly lethal experience with Boer farmers.

Since the unfortunate and deadly implementation of the Thatcher-Reagan policy of “constructive engagement” toward South Africa — which always was a plan that would end in the slow-track extermination of whites — and the installment of the talentless government of the ex-terrorist Nelson Mandela, South Africa, under black rule, has declined from being the reliable economic powerhouse of the African continent to being just one more African basket case where poverty grows, economies free fall, anti-white racism spreads, and foreign aid becomes the fuel of domestic tyranny, a fuel that is today powering the murderous racism of South Africa’s ruling blacks

The Pope, EU leaders, multiple U.S. administrations — including, to date, Trump’s –and most of the world’s Christian leaders have not and will not act to try to stop the Black South Africans’ ongoing massacre of white South African farmers. Well, a pox on them, and may they all rot slowly and painfully in hell. Better yet, may they one day be ruled, persecuted, and terminated by black South Africans, whose constitution U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg considers sublime and able to provide governing principles that are far better than the American Constitution. Ginsburg said she particularly likes the human-rights provisions of the South African constitution, you know, those provisions that are now being applied to murder white South African farmers.

Obama and Ginsburg, as always, are champions of globalism, tyranny, and the full destruction of the Western tradition, and, as always, they seek to disguise that fact with endless oral flatulence about human rights, which for them, is the right of non-obedient human beings to be killed by their government or, even better, a world government.

All told, Mr. Putin is the only world leader that has shown the moral courage to at least try to do something for the white South African farmers, and — if it works — that something will be fine because it will benefit Russia, the Boers, and Russian agriculture. Australia, New Zealand, and the United States would do well to follow Putin’s example. (NB: Forget Canada, though, under Trudeau it will be rooting for the black murderers.)

Happily, it will also leave the Boer’s black South African murderers and their governmental abettors in quite a bad fix, as white farmers grow about two-thirds of all the crops in South Africa, an abundance that now suffices domestically and allows exports to several other, often ill-fed African nations. Following is what these murderous morons are intent on wiping out.

South Africa’s 35,000 remaining commercial farmers (down from 60,000 in 1996) are vital to the food security of 54-million South Africans (up from 40-million in 1995). They also contribute 3.9% of the country’s gross domestic product, employ more than 650,000 mostly unskilled people and help to boost exports and hold down the current account deficit. They generally have good relationships with their workers and don’t pay less than the statutory minimum wage. Many have also done all they can to mentor new black farmers and generally help with the process of land reform. (2)

What’s that story about the great danger that lies in killing the goose that lays the golden egg? Guess its either not a popular story in South Africa, or maybe its just that the witless Mandela-ites killed and ate ye olde goose long ago.

Endnotes

1. https://www.sovereignman.com/trends/south-africas-brand-new-president-wants-to-confiscate-land-from-white-farmers-22993/ and http://www.businessinsider.com/south-africa-cyril-ramaphosa-wants-to-confiscate-white-farmers-land-2018-2
2. Quoted at “Ethnic hatred with an SA twist: Evil truths about farm murders — Ed Herbst” (https://www.biznews.com/africa/2017/12/27/ethnic-hatred-sa-farm-murders-herbst/)