With Israel, again, and again, and again on the road to the republic’s ruin – Why?

 

It begins, again, to look like an episode of a long-running  freak show that sees Israel and Palestine putting America at the brink of war, long after they and their American supporters have destroyed the reputation of the United States for even-handedness foreign affairs, and now further strengthen the world’s belief that the United States supports to-the-hilt the ghastly conduct of supposedly allied countries like Israel, Palestine, and Ukraine. In truth, though, the fatal fault lies only on the United States president, Congress, bureaucracy, military, and media as there seems not to be more than a dozen men and women in that entire mass of detritus that gives a good damn about U.S. security and the safety of Americans.

Since Truman recognized Israel because he needed money for a presidential campaign, the United States — and especially its double-passported Congress, media, and Jewish-American community – have shaped the republic in only one direction; namely to make it become Israel’s bottomless treasury and monster defender whenever the Israeli government snaps its fingers. It also ensures that the whole world knows that America literally is Israel’s Daddy Warbucks, one that has money but neither backbone nor brain. To identify the American republic as being independent is, today, utter, lying nonsense. How can it be independent when all it takes are orders from Israel instructing America that its wartime, and to initiate the march of American military forces toward the Middle East?

Between Israel and NATO the idea of an independent America, free to decide for itself when it will act internationally and when it will not, is a purely ridiculous assertion, a nonsense. The fact is that the definition of our-war making power lies not in acting according to the Constitution and doing what is best for the United States – which almost always would be a quick decision to resolutely stay at home – but rather to surrender the republic to the control to the likes of Israeli leaders, spokesmen, and Jewish-Americans, the latter threatening to withdraw their donations to schools because some students support Palestinians. Americans also simultaneously run a daily risk that one of the many small and feckless NATO governments will get into a military jam that means automatic war for America. In such case, America immediately begins a must-be-fought war because the North Atlantic treaty has made the republic both the pawn of Western European politics and the longtime funder for the defense of the World’s most woke, week-kneed, and anti-military region.

And where are the mighty Arab leaders? Well, they are where they always have been, sitting on their thrones in presidential or royal palaces, pushing money to Palestine to ease their consciences, while condemning the United States and Israel for killing “poor Palestinians” (or Lebanese, Iranians, or Syrians, or whoever Israel marks as its target of the month). The Arabs will do anything they can to defend the Palestinians, so long as its causes themselves no harm, physical discomfort, unwanted immigration, or undo effort, which amounts – per their own words — to a sort of a Koran-be-damned attitude. Look at a map of the region for a moment and ask why the enormous Arab and Muslim world has failed for 75 years to solve Palestine’s problems with Israel by force or by holding the world hostage via their oil weapon? The answer of course is that the Arab and Muslim governments – like Israel and NATO governments – see the United States government as always ready to play the tied-down-like-Gulliver sucker. That is just a too perfect and hilarious scene for them to tamper with. As long as the republic remains obedient by staying at the end of Israel’s short-leash, and as long as Israel keeps the U.S. Congress, media, and bureaucracy suborned, the Arab leaders can forever preach hatred for Israel, love for the Palestinians, and damnation for the Americans, while all the while hanging around their palaces and living the good life to extreme excess.

The bottom line is that mindless American support for Israel begins to be ingrained in young Americans even before high school. That idea is based on a media-built vision of Israel as a “struggling democracy” and “our only ally”, in the Middle East. In this scenario it is a country surrounded by hate-filled – though militarily impotent – Arab states, and thus the United States must always remain the mighty protector of this “tiny democracy”. No questions asked. To complement this theme – at least when I was a kid, perhaps not now – history teachers showed accurate films about the terrors of the Nazi camps, with the second purpose of instilling pity and love for Israel in naïve children. Thus, in my day, this was the start of mind-controlled adults, ever ready to acquiesce to Israel’s demands. It worked well for a good many years, until the Democrats decided to punish Israel and Jews generally by using their professorial ideologues to teach hate for Israel and love for Palestinians and other terrorists, like the party’s very own BLM and ANTIFA. Somewhere along the line, Israeli and Jewish-American leaders lost the thread, failing to see that their donations were being used to pay for the Democrats’ inculcation of anti-Semitism and production of their most important product … hate.

The United States government, under the Constitution, has never had a genuine and binding obligation to defend any nation but its own; other countries and people are not in its purview, unless there is foreign intervention with intent to seize control of territory in the Western Hemisphere. (NB: Our elites, however, have sidestepped their duty under the Constitution, the Monroe Doctrine and commonsense by allowing China to economically throttle the countries south of the Rio Grande.) Despite that constitutional fact, the U.S. government has signed and ratified treaties like the North Atlantic Treaty that created NATO, which, on its face, is unconstitutional because it negates the ability of the Congress to fulfill its sole constitutional responsibility to decide if, when, and against whom the United States will go to war. Truman’s administration and the Congress, of course, signed and ratified the NATO Treaty as much to defend the U.S. government and presidential wars against the will of its own people as to confront the USSR. The treaty was meant to ensure that future American presidents would not – like Franklin Roosevelt – have to be harassed by a pesky and always overwhelming majority of Americans who resolutely oppose the wars for which the sainted FDR and his close associates were panting.

So ardently did FDR and his boys want war that they used economic sanctions to maneuver Japan into a choice between war and complete economic oblivion. The Japanese obligingly did the necessary in spades, on 7 December 1941, and naturally turned America into a country rabid for war, and rightly so. Few of today’s Americans, however, know that in the weeks preceding Pearl Harbor, nationwide polls continued to show seventy-to-eighty percent of Americans opposed any foreign war, this even after they were being attacked by FDR, his cabinet, the FBI and their allies in the British government and security services, which were working independently and covertly in America, with FDR’s okay. The activities of these beauties were intended to break the back of the non-interventionist movement; that is the ant-war will of the American people. For three years before Pearl Harbor that unholy alliance had been waging war to discredit non-interventionists as Pacifists, Nazis, mentally ill, and anti-Americans. FDR’s deceit, illegality, adoration of Britain and its traditional wickedness, and something near treason turned the trick. He got the war he wanted, and Hitler helped him by declaring war on the United States. With Pearl Harbor. the American people seemingly lost forever their right to effectively oppose and so stop a president determined to go to war just because he wants to and does so in violation of the Constitution. Again, the proof of that lies in the treaty that produced NATO. If little Moldova is attacked early tomorrow morning, the United States would be at war before most people had their breakfast and heard the news. It would be yet another Presidential War, which in no way can be identified as a legitimate American war.

Today, Americans see that several carrier task groups, thousands of Marines, sailors, airmen, and soldiers, scads of military aircraft, and many billions of dollars are being sent to the Middle East so the republic can once again play lapdog and do Israel’s bidding against the Palestinian horde the Israel’s are seeking to obliterate from the earth. Another fool’s errand, more dead and maimed U.S. military personnel, and perhaps a nuclear war. If Israel does not scour Hamas from the scene, the remnants of Hamas will regroup, feed of the money and military resources of the Arabs, Persians, and others to rebuild, and before long the United States will be giving increased aid to the Israelis and playing the role of a brain-dead military automaton, like a rich old Dad who forever goes to the rescue of an errant child who can never seem to grow up or care for his own. What’s the point? The continued existence of Israel is about as low on the totem pole of genuine U.S. national-security interests as you can get; perhaps only Ukraine and Palestine could be lower.

The bottom line for America is to stop doing things in the foreign-policy realm that do not matter, unnecessarily risk war, or are just plain stupid. As a nation, we are now flush with all three. The security of the United States is not dependent on the existence of Ukraine, Israel, Palestine, or NATO. Indeed, each drains our resources, expands our commitments, betrays our strategic stupidity, deepens our debt, and needlessly increases – because of a long war-mad, suborned, and constitutionally irresponsible Congress — our chances of getting into a war for peoples and/or entities that are, at base, worthless to us and from whom we earn only scorn, threats, and less national security

The U.S. government’s responsibility rests on only five principles; namely, (a) the protection of America’s territorial integrity and people, the maintenance of all of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, (b) ensuring there is a vibrant republicanism nationally and in each state; (c) displaying an appropriate and genuine level of thankfulness for God’s gifts to Christian America, among which are the broad oceans that flank the republic, deep harbors, abundant natural resources, navigable rivers, endless fertile land, ample potable water, the best-kept environment in the world, and (d) the consistent use of the stern commonsense and measured pessimism that characterized the republic’s founding. The Lord’s gifts are things that only fools would dare to ignore or deliberately cock-up. Sadly, since 1917 our republic’s elites, as a whole, can best be described by the term “fools a’plenty”, bent only on causing wars and filling their pockets, while our children die in the unnecessary wars they are sent to fight but never to win. Thus, the failure to win any war since 1945.

Since 1783, this republic has never had an ally that it would not be better off without, nor a foreign nation whose disappearance or destruction would matter a lick. Americans need to examine the shocking and debilitating mess that both political parties deliberately have made of the republic, its wealth and economy, its once ethnically compatible and patriotic population, its social cohesion, its borders, its respect for religion, and its fierce detestation of foreign wars and the idiot idea of taking orders from foreigners and foreign institutions they had no voice in electing or creating. Having done that review, Americans worth the name will know what needs to be done. The republic’s existence now depends on whether they decide to do it.

Posted in Articles | 19 Comments

Pope sends FBI more “evidence” against Catholics

The New World Order-obsessed Pope has sent FBI and its DOJ masters more Vatican-backed “evidence” for listing, harrassing,  prosecuting, and probably imprisoning American Catholics as “terrorists”. The Pope pictures American Catholic traditionalists as backward and dangerous, and implies they are trying to hold back what he sees as progress — which means the worldwide implementation of communism, replacement migration, and the continued inoculation with lethal vaccines, all goals of the Pope-supported New World Order.

A piece published in by the Associated Press on 18 October 2023 merits a read by all American Catholics and Christians. In it the Pope sounds less  like a cleric eager to protect his flock, and much more like the head of a Vatican-based press gang who is ready to chain his American opponents to the oars of a a 16th century Spanish galleon.

It also is worth noting that the Pope is directly attacking the American political system. When he says Americans have “replaced religion with ideology” he is expressing his hatred for Trump, his supporters, the Founders, individual liberty, and free speech, as well as  our most important state documents, the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, On the Necessity of Taking up Arms, etc. At the same time he is supporting a mass of lethal and authoritarian American miscreants like Biden, the Bushes, the Obamas, the Clintons, and the whole of the Democratic Party.

The Pope also forgets that it was the long fight put up by American Catholics and their allies in other Christian sects that finally brought an end to the  the U.S. federal government’s protection of murder-by-abortion, which yielded the deliberate killing of 63 million American infants, from which profit was derived by the murderers from selling the body parts of the slaughtered. Believers know that this was an achievement expected of them by the Lord, and those who were murdered by callous and well-paid doctors-killers should be honored each year by a presidential “Declaration of a Day of National Humiliation, Fasting, and Prayer.” The Pope of course should likewise issue such an annual proclamation at a success that pleased God, but he will not. It would offend his authoritarian partners, all of whom are striving to kill many more human beings of all faiths and colors with additional lethal vaccines, as well as to reduce those who are not killed to abject poverty and starvation.

The AP article follows. The Pope’s threat in it can be heard loud and clear. It demands the utmost opposition and denunciation from American Catholics, Christians, and all loyal to Christ and/or the First Amendment.

“During the meeting, a Portuguese Jesuit told Francis that he had suffered during a recent sabbatical year in the United States because he came across many Catholics, including some U.S. bishops, who criticized Francis’ 10-year papacy as well as today’s Jesuits.

The 86-year-old Argentine acknowledged his point, saying there was “a very strong, organized, reactionary attitude” in the U.S. church, which he called “backward.” He warned that such an attitude leads to a climate of closure, which was erroneous.

“Doing this, you lose the true tradition and you turn to ideologies to have support. In other words, ideologies replace faith,” he said.

“The vision of the doctrine of the church as a monolith is wrong,” he added. “When you go backward, you make something closed off, disconnected from the roots of the church,” which then has devastating effects on morality.

“I want to remind these people that backwardness is useless, and they must understand that there’s a correct evolution in the understanding of questions of faith and morals,” that allows for doctrine to progress and consolidate over time.”

During the meeting, a Portuguese Jesuit told Francis that he had suffered during a recent sabbatical year in the United States because he came across many Catholics, including some U.S. bishops, who criticized Francis’ 10-year papacy as well as today’s Jesuits.

The 86-year-old Argentine acknowledged his point, saying there was “a very strong, organized, reactionary attitude” in the U.S. church, which he called “backward.” He warned that such an attitude leads to a climate of closure, which was erroneous.

“Doing this, you lose the true tradition and you turn to ideologies to have support. In other words, ideologies replace faith,” he said.

“The vision of the doctrine of the church as a monolith is wrong,” he added. “When you go backward, you make something closed off, disconnected from the roots of the church,” which then has devastating effects on morality.

“I want to remind these people that backwardness is useless, and they must understand that there’s a correct evolution in the understanding of questions of faith and morals,” that allows for doctrine to progress and consolidate over time.

Francis has previously acknowledged the criticism directed at him from some U.S. conservatives, once quipping that it was an “honor” to be attacked by Americans.”

Endnote:

1.) “Pope says some ‘backward’ conservatives in US Catholic Church have replaced faith with ideology.” See, https://apnews.com/article/pope-francis-vatican-conservatives-abortion-us-bbfc346c117bd9ae68a1963478bea6b3

Posted in Articles | 2 Comments

The Pope yearns for New World Order tyranny

More than seventy years after my baptism, the great enemy of Catholicism and Christianity and the champion of abominations, Pope Francis, has cemented his  well-earned reputation as just one more New World Order-Marxist shill. For me it’s doubly painful because he also is a Jesuit, an order of men from whom I received a rigorous undergraduate education and a reinforcement of my faith. But that was fifty years ago, and it has taken me most of that half-century to realize that the Jesuit men from whom I learned are long gone, and have been replaced by an order of new-age fruit pies who behave not as “soldiers of Christ” but as mercenaries for a church-crushing Pope and the project of humanity crushing led by the like of Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Joe Biden, the UN, the Papacy and their associated gangsters.

In hindsight, I failed to see the clues that were are all too apparent from the start of this Pope’s pontificate. Most especially, I paid too little attention to the deluge of praise from the mainstream media, the Democratic Party, and the enormous mass of Jesus-only-on-Christmas-and-Easter American Roman Catholics and Protestants, all of whom appeared overwhelmingly delirious and even mad in their gushing welcome for the Pope on his first trip to America. At the time, I thought how disappointed this mass of Americans would be when the new Jesuit Pope gave them a proper what for.

But this Pope never gave them what for, he gave them abominations, climate fraud, persistent anti-Americanism, and a steady and aggressive campaign to destroy traditional Catholics and Catholicism. He revealed himself — through consistent words and deeds — to be at one with the Marxist New World Order. The joy he found on his arrival in America was because his acolytes knew he was one of them, a Pope who would begin to give them a softer ride toward salvation after they has been been battered by the always correct but at times stern words of John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Those two men always were empathetic toward their flock, but they never let them forget that the road to salvation is not a broad, smooth, and unobstructed highway, but rather a grinding, lifelong effort to get the camel through the eye of a needle.

It took only a short time to realize that this Pope was cut from the same cloth as typical Latin-American Marxists, as well as the cloth produced by the new-age Jesuits and their theorists when they manufactured the violence-causing and bitter-envy producing secular dogma of Liberation Theology. The latter is perhaps best summarized as the following message to people who achieve success in all ranks of society: “You have too much, we will take it from you, and leave you nothing.” Which, not surprisingly, is the motto which is emblazoned on the banners of the authoritarian WEF, the UN, and the NWO.

Since assuming the Papacy, this Pope’s every word and action has been aimed at destroying traditional Catholicism. His special priority is eliminating the the Latin Mass and those “Traditional Catholics” who love it. Thanks to the Pope’s well-advertised fingering of the Latin-Mass lovers among American Catholics, who also have been fingered by the most despicable private-sector, FBI/DOD/DHS-paid U.S. media organizations are — or soon will be — on the FBI’s terrorist watch list on the basis of their religious beliefs and preferences. This week, the Pope again deliberately made life dicey for American Catholics, and Americans generally, because they have refused to obediently support a unneeded, anti-human Carbon tax and its accompanying poverty-boom. This once again proves that the Pope’s driving motive in his Papacy is to instill in his flock unquestioning obedience to authority. The Pope does not seem to know that among the many glories of Christianity is the unbreakable link between the faith and liberty.

This Pope’s endless use of the mantra “this planet is our common home”, also the favorite mantra of globalist leaders, is nothing more than a sledge hammer to break nationalism, to condition the people to learn an equation whose answer amounts to “saving our common home” = living under vicious  authoritarian world government, which already has killed millions of people with the Chinese Virus; plans to kill billions more with additional biological-attacks, forced starvation, water rationing, ending the cultivation of rice, greatly limiting the acreage used for growing food; the witless slaying of huge numbers of cows and chickens, halting the manufacture of nitrogen-based fertilizers that is irreplaceable for grain growing, and ending agriculture production in The Netherlands, the world’s second largest producer of foodstuffs. (See, UN, WEF, NWO documents and statements and — if your stomach can take it — the speeches, statements, and musings of John Keery/Czar of all the Climate- frauds, as well as the stupidest American who ever lived)

This Pope is uninterested in following Christ’s cross but is publicly eager to follow the familiar symbols of  the kind of life on earth that he wants champions, one which flies as its flag the hammer-and-sickle, the swastika, the red flag of China, the Democratic Party’s terrorist flag of Antifa, and whose saints are Che, Castro, Zelensky, Netanyahu, Gates, Schwab, Trudeau, Biden, the Clintons, the Bushes, the Obamas, and every other authoritarian who has slithered or is now slithering on the earth. By becoming a mindless advocate of the knowingly murderous and science-free Climate Change experts, and throwing the power of his influence behind the New World Order, the Pope has proven his goal is not in saving souls, improving lives, and keeping the peace, but rather the creation of a New World Order featuring an omnipresent tyranny of the elites.

Finally, two sections of the Pope’s most recent message “Laudate Dei” (Praise God), are worth noting. First, the Pope’s new document is about glorifying the fraud of climate change and, as a whole, reeks of his detestation for Western Culture. It betrays, I suspect, a career spent seeking to undermine it on every possible occasion.

In the document, the Pope first lashes out at a key component of that culture, namely the idea of individual merit and, therefore, the indispensable importance of rewarding each individual for achieving  meritorious goals. His goal apparently is  to place equity over equality, meaning that the application of the lowest common denominator at all levels of human enterprise. He seems to argue that both the most talented and least talented must be assigned — by a government of the elite, of course — equal outcomes in life. In the American context, this would mean forcing Americans to believe in the equality of the achievements of George Washington and Joe Biden, of Dwight Eisenhower and Joan Rivers, and of Jesus and Stalin.  On this issue, the Pope writes:

Mistaken notions also develop about the concept of “meritocracy”, which becomes seen as a “merited” human power to which everything must be submitted, under the rule of those born with greater possibilities and advantages. A healthy approach to the value of hard work, the development of one’s native abilities and a praiseworthy spirit of initiative is one thing, but if one does not seek a genuine equality of opportunity, “meritocracy” can easily become a screen that further consolidates the privileges of a few with great power. [NB: These are odd words for Pope as his allegiance belongs to “the few with great power. Are they not his well-loved comrades?]  In this perverse logic, why should they care about the damage done to our common home, if they feel securely shielded by the financial resources that they have earned by their abilities and effort?

Second comes the Pope’s tongue-lashing for Americans on the issue of the climate-change fraud. The Pope supports to the hilt the climate-change quacks’ advocacy of the grotesque lie about man-made climate change, and claims that it is “settled science” and so not questionable.

“If we consider that emissions per individual in the United States are about two times greater than those of individuals living in China, and about seven times greater than the average of the poorest countries, we can state that a broad change in the irresponsible lifestyle connected with the Western model would have a significant long-term impact. As a result, along with indispensable political decisions, we would be making progress along the way to genuine care for one another.”

With these words the Pope again purposefully creates additional and unnecessary tensions among American Catholics, between those Catholics who can see at first glimpse an unscientific, pocket-picking fraud, and those who believe that Jesus taught those with Him in Bethlehem about the bad impact of carbon dioxide on polar bears, and then informed the two criminals crucified on either side of Him that their executions were due to carbon monoxide. No sane man would want to cause a schism in any Christian sect, and yet the Pope’s words throughout “Laudate Dei”, and in many other statements over the years, seem to betray an angry obsession to suppress all people who dissent on issues he advocates — especially American dissenters–  through the tyrannical policies of a one-world-government. The Pope’s clear preference seems to be the second coming of Mao, not that of Jesus Christ.

 

Posted in Articles | 11 Comments

Climate-Change hucksters are history’s most murderous tyrants

One of the moments I recall from my grammar school years occurred in the fifth grade, which is now nearly 60 years ago. We had a school event in the autumn of that year that was called Arbor Day, with an assortment of speakers stressing the importance of all people doing their best to limit pollution and clean-up existing pollution problems.

The highlight of the day, at least for me, was a presentation on carbon dioxide (CO2). The science teacher who spoke described CO2 as, first, a protector of life of all kinds on earth by helping to keep the atmosphere’s temperature livable for the earth’s population. Second, that CO2 is an indispensable building block for all life on earth, as well as for the increased “greening” of the world to ensure the reliable and ample growth of grains and other foodstuffs, meaning that the more CO2 there is in the atmosphere, the more all peoples on the earth will be able to grow better quality and more bountiful crops. This has always been true, it is a hard and irrefutable scientific fact. In short, the more CO2 in the atmosphere the better and more nutritiously the earth’s peoples are fed.

That Arbor day’s presentation ended with a marked emphasis on the importance of planting and nurturing as many  trees as possible, as they are master CO2 producers. Needless to say, Bill Gates is calling for the destruction of millions of acres of trees. Again, the main theme of that Arbor day was that without plentiful CO2 in the air, human and all other life on earth would end.

Today, the climate-change hucksters are loud and well-spoken individuals who endlessly defend the indefensible and, frankly, murderously anti-science position that claims that CO2 is a poisonous danger to all people, and that if CO2 is not eradicated from the atmosphere — along with the destruction of much of the world’s forests — life on earth will eventually disappear. In other words, the Climate Changers position on CO2 is 100-percent inaccurate and an anti-science lie. They and other so-called scientific and medical experts often arrogantly claim that they “own the science” and that is true. The science they own — at least that on climate change — is a death-dealing science they invented and are delivering to be used against all non-elite human beings on earth. The science they own — and claim to be “settled” — should be more accurately titled “The Universal and Massive Population Reduction Strategy.” These scientists, their funders, and the elites to whom they answer are dedicated not to improving the earth’s environment and so the quality of human life — except for their own lives, of course — but, rather, they are bent on annihilating the great bulk of humanity with their so-called settled, anti-science science.

Now, I readily admit that my scientific knowledge is no more than average, if that. Fortunately, a good friend of mine sent me the article that is appended below. The scientist-author who is the subject of this article, Dr. Indur Goklany, is an acknowledged climate expert, as well as “a 35-year veteran of the global warming (now climate change) debate. This presentation of Dr. Golkany’s science-based argument is compelling, and just as importantly it puts paid to the claims of such Climate-Change fraudsters as Biden, John Kerry, Justin Trudeau, all EU leaders, nearly all major universities, the media, the UN, the World Economic Forum, the Nobel gang and other prize-givers, and the American and European climate academics who supply the foregoing with the fake-science needed to support their murderous climate lies in exchange for substantial “research grants”. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospherics Agency (NOAA) lends these criminals a hand by altering historical climate records to make it appear that the corrupted data supports the lies that are dominant in what the political and scientific climate-change gangsters and cretins like Obama call the “settled science” of climate change.

Fossil Fuels Are the Greenest of Energy Sources

by Gregory Wrightstone, 26 September, 2022;  https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/09/26/fossil-fuels-are-the-greenest-of-energy-sources/

A 35-year veteran of the global warming debate says fossil fuels are the “greenest” of energy sources. In a recently published paperDr. Indur Goklany notes that carbon dioxide emissions from industrial activity and transportation have increased plant growth and that fertilizers and pesticides derived from fossil fuels have boosted crop yields so that more food can be produced on less land.

“Contrary to the claims of proponents of the Green New Deal and Net Zero, fossil fuels are the greenest fuels,” says Goklany. “First, uniquely among energy sources, fossil fuel use emits CO2, which is the ultimate source of the elemental building block, carbon, found in all carbon-based life — virtually all life on Earth.”

Referencing several studies, Goklany reports that up to 50 percent of global vegetated areas became greener between 1982-2009 and that 70 percent of the greening has been attributed to carbon dioxide emitted by the burning of fossil fuels.

Overall, Goklany credits 87 percent of the greening to fossil fuels. In addition to CO2 emissions, nitrogen deposition from fossil fuel-derived fertilizers and modest warming of the climate together account for another 17 percent of the greening, he says.

One researcher found that global leaf area had increased by 5.4 million square kilometers between 2000–2017, an area equivalent to the Amazon rain forest. Another reported global tree cover had grown by 2.24 million square kilometers from 1982–2016 through reforestation of former agricultural lands rendered surplus by improved farm productivity and of former deserts.

“Use of fossil fuel technologies has enabled human beings to spare 20.4 percent of global land area (GLA) for the rest of nature,” said Goklany, the author of several books and a former U.S. delegate to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. “This exceeds both the habitat lost currently to cropland (12.2 percent of GLA) and the global cumulative area currently reserved or identified as conservation areas (estimated at 14.6 percent of GLA).”

In other words, the amount of land preserved from conversion to agriculture because of fossil fuel-related productivity increases is 25 percent larger than the North American continent, said Goklany.

Increased agricultural productivity has allowed cropland in many areas to revert to forest or other non-agricultural use, he said.  For example, between 1990 and 2020, forests in the U.S. and Western Europe increased 2.4 percent and 10.1 percent despite population increases of 30 percent and 11 percent, respectively.

Making coal, oil and natural gas even greener is their relatively small footprint for power production, says Goklany. To generate the same amount of electricity as fossil fuels, solar would need more than three times as much land; wind, five times as much; and hydropower, 25 times as much.

Finally, the International Energy Agency notes that solar and wind energy typically require more metals and minerals than their fossil fueled counterparts. A typical electric vehicle, for example, requires six times the mineral inputs of a conventional car. An onshore wind turbine takes nine times more mineral resources than a natural gas-fired plant, while offshore wind requires 15 times as much as gas.

Dr. Goklany’s analysis underscores that policies forcing the replacement of fossil fuels with solar panels and wind turbines are counterproductive, exacerbating some of the very problems attributed to global warming. Specifically, they would increase global hunger and reduce biodiversity.  Even if such an energy transition would “improve” the climate — which it won’t — the remarkable benefits of carbon dioxide for humanity and the rest of nature are too great to risk negating. Moreover, coal and natural gas are by far more economical and reliable as power producers.

If any technology is to be favored by policy makers for electrical power generation, Dr. Goklany suggests, that it probably should be nuclear power because of its relative overall cleanliness. Even then, planners would be well advised not to put all their eggs in one basket. Nuclear-heavy France currently is working on mechanical problems at multiple plants in the midst of an energy shortage being solved in part with fossil fuels. In any case, fossil fuels are currently indispensable for manufacturing fertilizers and pesticides that are critical to producing adequate food supplies at reasonable prices.

This commentary was first published at Real Clear Energy, September 26, 2022, and can be accessed here.

Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist; executive director of the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Va.; and author of “Inconvenient Facts: The science that Al Gore doesnt want you to know.

 

Posted in Articles | 4 Comments

Seeking America’s destruction: The ADL, Jewish-American Supremacists, and Israel

Does any patriotic American really question the obvious fact that Jewish-Americans – apparently most of them — are right near the top of the list of the republic’s most virulent domestic enemies? These people are anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-nationalist, and, perhaps most of all, tyranny-loving. They irrefutably are seeking to utterly destroy the United States. Now, there is no reason to question this fact. It is not a conspiratorial delusion, disinformation, malinformation, or simply lies. It is just the plain truth. To question this reality can only mark the presence of a liar, an idiot, the deaf, or a Jewish-American hater of the American republic.

The U.S. government, its bureaucracy, most of the media, Hollywood and almost all economic, academic, business, political, and banking leaders, as well as a multitude of Christian pastors refuse to stand and confront the minuscule number of Jewish-Americans in the overall U.S. population. We all need to stand up and politely tell them to bugger-off, drop dead, move to Israel, or take your riches, kid-killing religious values, censorship, lethal pharma companies, all-out support for sexual depravity and stuff them up your collective ass or, better yet, up Yuval Harari’s well-reamed Nazi butt. Or maybe one of several old sayings might suffice, “What goes around comes around” and “Vigilantes always run out of time, protection, and life” come to mind. These Jewish-American supremacists – allied with the U.S. government — must be defied and eventually brought down hard if the republic is to survive.

The current head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Jonathan Greenblatt acts as if he is the chief public voice for what seems certain to be Jewish-America’s intense and bloodthirsty anti-white, anti-Christian, and anti-Constitution policies, as well its lust for tyrannical-government control over all Americans but themselves. The organization Greenblatt leads – with its lickspittle cohort, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) – are gathering data about Americans that they alone pick to define as terrorists, anti-Semites, white supremacists, right-wing conservatives, traditional Protestants and Catholics, Christian nationalists, etc. Then – after payment of course –  they turn the material over to the Democrat-commanded federal government, the DOD, and other anti-American federal agencies. The data names and locates the people the ADL has designated to be rounded-up, incarcerated, and probably killed. Among those not to be trusted agencies seem, at this pint, to be DOD, DOJ, IRS, FBI, ATF, NSA, CIA, CDC, FEMA, and FDA.

The ADL and the SPLC – and probably other subordinate organizations yet unnamed, as well as Israeli intelligence – constitute the republic’s first private-donation-funded (Jewish-American funded?) organizations that are bent on annihilating the kinds of people who founded, built, and defended America and have sought to protect its people’s God-given liberties under the Constitution. These two Jewish-American-led organizations arrogantly strut around and loudly proclaim their mission to protect all Americans from various kinds of depredations, an assertion that clearly is bullshit. They are often joined in this deeply deceitful behavior by the overwhelmingly anti-American/Israel-First lobby in the Congress.

These are clearly Jewish-American supremacist organizations that have long labored to control the United States with their fortunes, their stupendous lies, their intimidation, their Holocaust-whining, their media, their fiercely racist attitudes, their unrelenting weeping about supposed discrimination against Jews, as well as with the savage lessons they learned from the Nazis and the Bolsheviks and now practice and help Biden’s administration establish. Stalag Palestine or Labor Camp Siberia anyone? Even the KKK could not fool most Americans with their lethal, barely disguised tripe about protecting the nation’s racial purity and liberty. The Klan’s only plan was to use violence, murder, and torture to “fix the black problem” to the satisfaction of a paltry number of deadly Americans who joined and led the Klan.

The foregoing phrase ‘’deadly Americans” is the exact description of what appears to be the great majority of Jewish-Americans. How do we know this? Well, check my argument by listening to the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt and the issues he and it champions, and then tell me how many Jewish-Americans or their media-outlets have you heard damning the ADL for trying to destroy the American republic and opposing the incarceration of its enemies in the thoroughly criminal Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Biden tyrannies. Remember silence is the surest sign of either acquiescence or support. As I see it, a review of this media strongly shows that most Jewish-Americans have made not a peep criticizing the torment of their non-Jewish, fellow citizens by Greenblatt, the ADL, and its allied organizations and big-money donors. In view of this pervasive silence in the face of the ADL’s fierce public pogrom – and especially given the words, multiple hatreds, and tyranny-love flooding forth from the cancer called the ADL – how could any non-Jewish-American fail to conclude that most Jewish-Americans hate their fellow Americans and that they can be relied on to remain silent while Americans are attacked by their kin and coreligionists.

It is also worth noting that the foregoing is not a new phenomenon. Consider these other beauties that the ADL and its allies have championed or supported:

–Abortion: What can clearly be seen from what has been said in the media and in public statements by most Jewish leaders, is that 63 million murdered infant Americans is a tiny price to pay for what? Oh, yes, a woman’s right to be recklessly promiscuous and utterly and callously murderous. Abortion, of course, was meant to be and is the spearhead for wiping out the republic’s black citizens.  Even in Israel – home of the always whining, never-again/never-forget crowd – murdering babies at will is legal and applauded.

Replacing America’s white population: Jewish-American leaders have long advocated the illegal import of largely illiterate millions of cheap-labor-offering foreigners, people who are already well-trained by Latin American tyrannies to fear and obey government. These foreigners also must be allowed in because they often bring diseases long eradicated in America and so reintroduce them among the Americans the ADL has marked for incarceration and/or execution; namely, white people. There also seems to be no push-back from the Jewish-American community, its media, or its leaders to oppose the Biden regime’s obvious plans to use FEMA, the ATF, the U.S. Military, the IRS, the FBI, the NSA and other agencies, to rid the republic – either by killing them or first incarcerating and then murdering them — of whites, Christians of all colors, and nationalists.

Gun grabbing: One would suppose that no one would be more worried about gun-control – really gun-confiscation – than Jewish Americans, as they via their ancestors learned the dangers thereof from the Herr Hitler. But, no, Jewish-Americans – especially in their wildly out of proportion to population and generally demented Congressional delegation — form a large proportion of the shit-babbling fools, Democrats, and cowards (all synonyms, I guess) who support the removal of the 2nd Amendment. Why so? Because, as Hillary Clinton so often puts it, “guns endanger children,” which must mean that Jewish-American and all other anti-gun crusaders think 63 million murdered un-borns and new-borns are nifty, but no children should be killed by guns before the pedophile-loving Democratic Party and its members and heroes – like Jeffrey Epstein and many big shots in politics, business, the media, and Hollywood – can groom and/or kidnap the little ones and then distribute to them to party members and their supporters for torture events and/or fine dining.

Endless wars: Any war is a good war for the ADL, and apparently for the largely silent Jewish-American community and its Congressional contingent. Any war that Israel likes and supports is okay with the ADL, the Jewish-American community and media, and its bought-and-paid for slop-jar mouthed congressional representatives. One of America’s three great diplomats, George Kennan – the others being Benjamin Franklin and John Quincy Adams – said that the idea of the United States recognizing Israel was tantamount to knowingly signing an accord in which America would be the eternal loser. Truer words were never spoken, given our history of Middle East wars, support for the permanence of the Israel-run gulag Israel in Palestine, the Israelis’ theft of U.S. nuclear secrets, which were key the building of their first atomic weapons, Israel’s suborning of Jewish-American bureaucrats to commit espionage against the United States, Israel’s probable use of American financial aid to purchase the undying, unthinking, and America-damaging loyalty of large, corrupt, and dual-pass-ported majorities in both houses of Congress, the U.S. government’s repeated, haplessly idiotic attempts to defame and defang Islam, the benefit of which accrues only to Israel as the efforts are meant to lead to more U.S.-Arab wars.

–Anti-Semitism: The idea of applying the term antisemitism to any speech that Jewish-American leaders and organizations do not like has long worked like a charm to intimidate those Americans who question whether Jewish-American supremacy over the lives and ambitions of all other Americans is the desired outcome for their society. Often the phrase is just the start of attacks by the ADL and their allies on an individual’s financial, banking, and business interests, combined with pressure on advertisers to abandon the ADL’s target. This is not new, Jewish-Americans leaders and film makers, with U.S.-based British diplomats and intelligence officers, F.D. Roosevelt and his cabinet, and the FBI, worked together in the latter 1930s to force America’s entry into World War 2. Then, when Colonel Charles A. Lindbergh and the America First Committee (AFC) called out this stinking, war-mongering gang between 1939 and 1941, the miscreants worked to undermine the non-interventionists – often using war-wanting journalists and their papers, as well as unconstitutional electronic and physical surveillance — and identify them as Nazis and traitors.

–All of this was done against Lindbergh, the AFC, and America as a whole at a time when nationwide polls consistently showed that about 80-percent of Americans wanted no part of another European war. Given these numbers and his own beliefs, Lindbergh refused to play any part in quietly watching this British-Eastern Elite-Jewish-American subversion of the American will, and, with precision and utter truth, publicly identified Britain, Jewish-American leaders, and Roosevelt’s regime as the three greatest agitators pushing America into a war its people clearly did not want. Lindbergh, America First, and the American people held the line and had some short-term successes until Roosevelt’s engineered war with Japan began at Pearl Harbor, which also produced Hitler’s declaration of war. The revenge exacted on Lindbergh by Jewish-American leaders from 1939 through the present day has reduced Lindbergh’s stature and reputation to dust covered with manure, when, in truth, Colonel Lindbergh was one of the greatest, most talented, most heroic Americans of the 20th century. If you have doubts about the pro-war agitation of Jewish-American leaders from 1939-1941, watch Warner Brothers’ movies from the period; read about Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter’s role as Roosevelt’s agent in promoting the interventionist cause; read the writings of journalist Walter Lippmann as he pushed for war, and review the pro-war activities of the Jewish Telegraph Agency based in New York City.

Finally, I want to thank the ADL and several of its media shills who recently reviewed my work in four articles and found it wanting: Media Matters (2), The Wrap, and Salon. To receive just a tiny percentage of the same oddly written, deeply ignorant, and racist articles from the same kind of Jewish-American hate-hacks that attacked Colonel Lindbergh, I can only regard as a commendation. To my great delight, I have apparently hit the same target (domestic Democratic tyranny and domestic war-lovers) as did Colonel Lindbergh. It is a target I will continue to hit as often as necessary until it is either tamed or destroyed, or I am.

Posted in Articles | 31 Comments

A few points on the great majority of 26 comments on my last post

–1.) Where do you think Israelis and Jewish-Americans learned their style of government: (a) the Nazis, (b) the Bolsheviks, (c) their scriptures, religious writers, and clergy, or (4.) all three?

–2.) I of course bow before your dazzling and in-depth expertise about Q and his falsity. I cannot rule out that possibility, but you have to, in fairness, consider the possibility that there be a few people on earth who know more about Q than you do. Wisdom often lies in never saying never.

–3.) By now it must be clear that I write as a strident nationalist. From that angle, I would ask — what’s your problem with Putin? He faced a neighboring country that was deliberately killing ethnic Russians in substantial numbers. He faced a government created by the West, after it overthrew a pro-Russian regime in Kiev and was ready to offer the country membership in the EU and NATO. He also faced a country that was hosting several dozen U.S.-built-and-controlled chemical weapons laboratories and manufacturing facilities not far from Russia’s border. Some of those labs were building weapons that could be specifically targeted against Slavs. The only surprise we’ve had from Putin is that he did not attack earlier and with far greater savagery Instead, he stupidly followed the always defeated, post-1945 America model of war-making that rejects the infallible rule that only application of overwhelming and indiscriminate military power — like that used this month by Biden and his NWO, UN, and Big Tech buddies (all also Nazis/Bolsheviks/Israelis) against Americans living on Maui) — can deliver the only mercy ever found in war-making — quick and utter victory.

–4.) Thank you all for writing.

Posted in Articles | 24 Comments

A note on some recent reader comments

The last few blogs I’ve written have drawn an odd assortment of comments. The overwhelming theme of some of those messages is that I am a dishonest mouthpiece for Jewish-Americans and Israel.

Now, I have written more than 600 pieces for this blog in the past dozen years. There is no way to read those items and come to the conclusion that I am mouthpiece for the Israel-firsters. Those who do can only be judged half-wits or – perhaps more likely – Israel-firsters trying to make me lash out violently at Jewish-Americans, other Jewish people, and Israel in manner that approximates their own feigned anti-Jewish hatred and credible pro-Nazi demeanor.

I also must note that my criticism has become increasingly strident given that such Jewish-American organizations as the ADL and the SPLC – each a great pool of  mercenary, traitorous, and poisonous scum – are gathering information on white American conservatives and Christians in general and supplying it to Biden, the FBI, the Pentagon, and other government agencies to aid in their plan to wipe out the white conservatives and Christians that the Jewish-American organizations are fingering in return for pay.

I do have a relatively short temper, but I do control it, though at times it takes a concentrated effort. The latter was my experience this time out. That said, I can only suggest, in a friendly way, that Q long ago told us that Israel will come last.

Posted in Articles | 38 Comments

And now it is Niger?

The Biden administration and that ever-reliable loser known as the U.S. military, with the few African lickspittles they have left, are out to intervene in Niger, even as they are getting their asses kicked in Ukraine. Seems time for Senator Paul and the Freedom Caucus to sound out loud and clear in opposition to this week’s war-of-choice.

But will they? Somehow, I doubt it. They have done virtually nothing to stop hundreds of billions of dollars being sent to help Ukraine fully reset itself to Nazism, the latter always the political philosophy of choice for the Democrats. Indeed, the power of war to create a steady flow of graft into the pockets and front-companies of grifting American politicians, generals, and civil servants is unrivaled. It became institutionalized in World War I and has been roaring ahead ever since. We enter wars willy nilly and never give a damn about casualties, wasted tax monies, or victory so long as the tide of money flows during the war and American companies get to lead the immensely expensive projects to reconstruct and paganize the country their president deliberately destroyed.

It is clear that Niger ranks at much less than zero national-security importance to the United States. To whom is it important? Well only France, whose dunderhead leaders have, for at least a half-century, built a 75-percent dependence on uranium from Niger to power their domestic nuclear-powered electrical networks. Niger, of course, is a country that loves the money France spends on uranium, but truly hates their former colonial masters. If someone is to reteach those Paris sees as uppity black people in Niger the fact that colonialism never really ends and they must obey, the French must do it off their own hook.

The mighty Macron has killed his own people with speed and aplomb by lying about the “threat” of Covid and then poisoning them vaccines meant to kill and cripple them, he has punished them by championing EU and WEF fascism and economic idiocy, he has tied the French to the now lost American war in Ukraine, and has knowingly left the French people first without Russian natural gas, and now without uranium to face the coming winter’s cold.

Perhaps, Macron should round up his close partners – Schwab and Trudeau – and fly to Niger and order those disagreeable black people to behave in the traditional French manner; namely, by surrendering to the those who threaten them. With luck, the people of Niger will treat them appropriately, by awarding them a South African welcome — a tire slipped down to their respective middles and then set on fire.

Back to the Congress with a reminder. Neither Ukraine nor Niger are of any interest to the United States, so keep us out of this Macron-made mess. It would be unwise in the extreme for the Congress, the dunce-filled Biden Administration, and its weighed-down-by-graft flag officers to begin a yet another losing war in Niger. After all, if there is one thing Americans have yet to be deprived of it is a nearly endless supply of used and new tires. The time nears to use them, if only to clean up the environment, that’s a trendy issue these days you know.

Posted in Articles | 15 Comments

This Virginian is worth a listen

I heard this song just know and found it pretty realistic about today’s America. The singer is a young Virginian named Oliver Anthony and the song is called “Rich Men North of Richmond”. This fellow Anthony surely is a worthy successor to his Virginia ancestors who fought and died for liberty, independence, and Old Virginia in 1776-1783 and 1861-1865. Give it a go.

Posted in Articles | 17 Comments

It is necessary to apply punishment in the most exemplary manner

It is therefore of the utmost importance to the security and happiness of any state, to punish, in the most exemplary manner, all those who are entrusted by it, and betray that trust: It becomes the wisdom of a nation, to give ten thousand pounds for a head which cheats it of sixpence. Valerius Maximis calls severity the sure preserver and avenger of liberty: It is as necessary for the preventing of tyranny, as for the support of it. Cato’s Letters, No. 20, 11 March 1721(1)

The increasing chaos and lawlessness that is today’s America, I suspect, is a prelude to civil war – surely the governing elites, their sycophants among federal, state, and military bureaucracies, and their allies in business, banking, medicine, pharmaceuticals, and the media have more than earned their own demise. Think, for example, of the current none-of-our-business European war that is bleeding the republic in terms of money, military, weapons, vehicles, and munitions, even as DOD leaders frantically work to queer-up the military. The only valuable aspect of the U.S. government’s Ukraine War has been its duration because it has allowed Americans to see, with utter clarity, that the actions of their leaders regarding the war have been despicable, profligate, unforgivable, dastardly, and directly aimed at hurting them here at home. These miscreants’ culpability for this war-loving/republic-hating behavior leaves them more than worthy of retribution from their countrymen acting in their own defense and on the basis of our founding documents. (Most especially, “On the Necessity of taking up Arms”, 6 July 1775, which I consider – with the Constitution — the best and most important. It was written by John Dickinson and Thomas Jefferson and published as an official resolution of the 2nd Continental Congress. The text of this document is below. It merits, I believe, a few minutes to read in its entirety, as it does a wide distribution as I doubt it is read much today in schools and universities. It also helps to explain why the Founders believed the 2nd Amendment was indispensable and unchangeable, and why our current elites want to erased.)

After reading the work of Dickinson and Jefferson, one question must be asked, “What is wrong with contemporary Americans?” Why do they put up with a national government that threatens and treats its citizenry and their country in a manner immeasurably worse than did the Parliament and ministers of George III? If colonial Americans rebelled against that overbearing regime, the current lack of rebellion – given the manifest and overwhelming crimes against them that are committed daily by Biden’s Administration — is simply inexplicable.

Are today’s Americans more cowardly, more ignorant about their history,and less observant than their predecessors? The first is possible, but the second and third can only be attributable to sloth, given the easy availability the alternative media’s accurate round-the-clock a coverage of the enormous impact on the citizenry and the Constitution-killing nature of Biden’s murderous policies, as well as his and his Cabinet’s witting personal support for such things as child-and woman trafficking; urban arson; gun confiscation, laughably ridiculous, quack-science-based claims of climate change; Black supremacy; death by Fentanyl; Black terrorist groups; population replacement via Biden-mandated illegal immigration to create the first peasant class in American history; illegal war-making abroad and at home; rugged and so treasonous elections; poisoned vaccines targeted particularly at whites; rampant treason in many Executive Branch departments and agencies; extortion by the president, his family, and his colleagues; 1st and 2nd amendment-wrecking; the physical mutilation and rape of children; and accelerating war on Christianity, unflagging support for cultivating Pedophlia and universal sexual depravity; cooperation with foreign narcotics cartels and their Chinese allies, the non-investigated destruction of hundreds of domestic food-processing facilities to help bring on famine; the economic, chemical/biological warfare, and technological empowerment of China, The United Nations, NATO, the Vatican, Ukraine, the World Economic Forum, and the fascist EU; and the growing madness and blood lust of each as well as the Democratic and much of the Republican parties. Each of these entities is a hive of eagerness for eliminating all white people and Christians of any color in the United States and worldwide.

The most pressing need for loyal citizens – and especially for the white and Christian populations which are tagged to be first to the guillotine – is to remove the Biden administration and obliterate every facet of the Democrats/Rinos/Federal Civil-Service’s long adherence to the tenets of the fascist and bloodthirsty orthodoxy of the New World Order. Now, many men and women whose views I respect have long argued that the Democrats’ domestic terrorist groups and perhaps some of those no-longer loyal in the military, FEMA, FBI, ATF, Homeland Security, CIA, NSA, DIA, etc. must be allowed to take the first shot that starts a civil war, just as Lincoln did. Think for a moment and consider if it would not take some kind of military of para-military force to systematically destroy c. 200 food-processing facilities? And then ask, who else but the FBI traitors would make zero effort to stop a nationwide campaign of serial arson that ensures the Biden administration’s plan to eliminate the reliable supply of food for Americans?

I now wonder whether such restraint is any longer appropriate behavior as the Biden-made inflation, war, population replacement, and economic-and-financial destruction continues. Why? First, we have seen nine years (2015-2023) of the brazen wickedness and aggressive inhumanity of elected Democrats at all levels of government and there is no credible reason to think that the republic’s Democrat-Rino enemies have any intention of altering their savage ways. Second, there is no reason to believe that a free-and-fair election will occur in the United States at any point in the foreseeable future. Indeed, the pre-2024 election preparations of Republicans in Michigan last month were disrupted when Michigan’s fascist state government arrested 16 Republicans for preparing for 2024 in in the same manner that has always been found legal for Democrats. We also have the Biden regime and state Democratic regimes refuse to prosecute those who murder whites for sport; those who perform sex-change operations on youngsters without their parents’ knowledge let alone permission; the ongoing and deliberate creation of a sexually depraved military destined to be worthless in battle but a danger to itself and all Americans and their children; the Biden administration’s cooperative operations with Mexican Cartels to bring in UN-mandated replacement population, to create a reliable supply line of kids to be tortured, raped, and dismembered by pedophiles; to continue flooding the country with sure-to-kill fentanyl, for the manufacture of which China supplies the precursors; while all the while Mexico, Panama, other Central American states , together with Biden, Mayorkas, and Austin,  facilitate the illegal entry of several hundred-thousand military-aged Chines men to enter the country.

The foregoing items, I think, cannot be assessed as anything other than direct and intentionally lethal attacks against Americans – especially white Christian Americans – their republic, Constitution, safety, health, employment, and the quality of the nation’s public schools in which teachers are no more than Democratic apparatchiks and apparently willing abusers of every child’s intellect, morals, and body. In addition, the Democrats and their whores in the FBI, local and state police departments, and the judiciary at all levels have already imprisoned hundreds of innocent citizens – mostly white and Christian I’d bet – for more than two years without trail, but with the in-jail application of violence verging on torture. If the foregoing does not amount to a civil war being waged by only one side, I do not know what it is.

So, is it time for a behavioral change among loyal American citizens, or is it still requisite for that segment of the population to patiently accept the above-noted acts of governmental tyranny  and judicial abuse, to acquiesce in the criminal free-for-all of non-punished violence accelerating across the country, quietly watch the ongoing effort to establish the supremacy of those with least merit, empathy, knowledge, and love of the republic, those with no apparent moral conscience and zero sense of civic responsibility, and those with such questionable sanity?

I guess it comes down to deciding whether we accept that the first shots were fired several years ago and many have hit their marks; that no mercy, humanity, or repentance is to be expected from the well-dressed swine who compose the political, economic, academic, and social elites; and that further delay in changing the citizenry’s tolerant behavior towards those who wish them dead, given the republic’s current dying state, will do no more than make its death certain. The decision to fight back is both a hard one and an individual one, but those who make the right decision are not likely to be lonely.

Finally, I thought it was worth including the text of the Dickinson-Jefferson document referred to above as the best example on how our ancestors thought their way through a response to British oppression and decided that the Crown had to go, even if it took a bloody rebellion fought against very long odds. My own view is that the colonists had not been provoked, threatened, and physically hurt by Parliament’s legislation and the King’s actions anywhere near the level that Americans have been hurt by the Biden regime since its installation after an irrefutably fixed election.

–Endnotes: 

–1.) Cato’s Letter, No. 20, 11 March 1721, quoted in Russell Trommer. Tea Time. Cato’s Letters, American Liberty, and the call of the Tea Party, 2016, p. 202. Valerius Maximus was a “Roman rhetorician and writer. His book, Nine books of memorable deeds and sayings, consists of historical anecdotes that were used by students of rhetoric to obtain historical information.” See, http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~duchan/new_history/ancient_history/valerius_maximus.html

–2.) A declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North America, now met in General Congress at Philadelphia, setting forth the causes and necessity of their taking up arms, 6 July 1775

“If it was possible for men, who exercise their reason, to believe, that the Divine Author of our existence intended a part of the human race to hold an absolute property in, and an unbounded power over others, marked out by his infinite goodness and wisdom, as the objects of a legal domination never rightfully resistible, however severe and oppressive, the Inhabitants of these Colonies might at least require from the Parliament of Great Britain some evidence, that this dreadful authority over them, has been granted to that body. But a reverence for our great Creator, principles of humanity, and the dictates of common sense, must convince all those who reflect upon the subject, that government was instituted to promote the welfare of mankind, and ought to be administered for the attainment of that end. The legislature of Great Britain, however, stimulated by an inordinate passion for a power, not only unjustifiable, but which they know to be peculiarly reprobated by the very constitution of that kingdom, and desperate of success in any mode of contest, where regard should be had to truth, law, or right, have at length, deserting those, attempted to effect their cruel and impolitic purpose of enslaving these Colonies by violence, and have thereby rendered it necessary for us to close with their last appeal from Reason to Arms,-Yet, however blinded that assembly may be, by their intemperate rage for unlimited domination, so to slight justice and the opinion of mankind, we esteem ourselves bound, by obligations of respect to the rest of the world, to make known the justice of our cause.

Our forefathers, inhabitants of the island of Great Britain, left their native land, to seek on these shores a residence for civil and religious freedom. At the expence of their blood, at the hazard of their fortunes, without the least charge to the country from which they removed, by unceasing labor, and an unconquerable spirit, they effected settlements in the distant and inhospitable wilds of America, then filled with numerous and warlike nations of barbarians. Societies or governments, vested with perfect legislatures, were formed under charters from the crown, and an harmonious intercourse was established between the colonies and the kingdom from which they derived their origin. The mutual benefits of this union became in a short time so extraordinary, as to excite astonishment. It is universally confessed, that the amazing increase of the wealth, strength, and navigation of the realm, arose from this source; and the minister, who so wisely and successfully directed the measures of Great Britain in the late war, publicly declared, that these colonies enabled her to triumph over her enemies.-Towards the conclusion of that war, it pleased our sovereign to make a change in his counsels.-From that fatal moment, the affairs of the British empire began to fall into confusion, and gradually sliding from the summit of glorious prosperity, to which they had been advanced by the virtues and abilities of one man, are at length distracted by the convulsions, that now shake it to its deepest foundations. The new ministry finding the brave foes of Britain, though frequently defeated, yet still contending, took up the unfortunate idea of granting them a hasty peace, and of then subduing her faithful friends.

These devoted colonies were judged to be in such a state, as to present victories without bloodshed, and all the easy emoluments of statuteable plunder.-The uninterrupted tenor of their peaceable and respectful behaviour from the beginning of colonization, their dutiful, zealous, and useful services during the war, though so recently and amply acknowledged in the most honorable manner by his majesty, by the late king, and by Parliament, could not save them from the meditated innovations.-Parliament was influenced to adopt the pernicious project, and assuming a new power over them, have, in the course of eleven years, given such decisive specimens of the spirit and consequences attending this power, as to leave no doubt concerning the effects of acquiescence under it. They have undertaken to give and grant our money without our consent, though we have ever exercised an exclusive right to dispose of our own property; statutes have been passed for extending the jurisdiction of courts of Admiralty and Vice-Admiralty beyond their ancient limits; for depriving us of the accustomed and inestimable privilege of trial by jury, in cases affecting both life and property; for suspending the legislature of one of the colonies: for interdicting all commerce to the capital of another; and for altering fundamentally the form of government established by charter, and secured by acts of its own legislature solemnly confirmed by the crown; for exempting the “murderers” of colonists from legal trial, and in effect, from punishment; for erecting in a neighboring province, acquired by the joint arms of Great Britain and America, a despotism dangerous to our very existence; and for quartering soldiers upon the colonists in time of profound peace. It has also been resolved in parliament, that colonists charged with committing certain offences, shall be transported to England to be tried.

But why should we enumerate our injuries in detail? By one statute it is declared, that parliament can “of right make laws to bind us IN ALL CASES WHATSOEVER.” What is to defend us against so enormous, so unlimited a power? Not a single man of those who assume it, is chosen by us; or is subject to our controul or influence; but, on the contrary, they are all of them exempt from the operation of such laws, and an American revenue, if not diverted from the ostensible purposes for which it is raised, would actually lighten their own burdens in proportion as they increase ours. We saw the misery to which such despotism would reduce us. We for ten years incessantly and ineffectually besieged the Throne as supplicants; we reasoned, we remonstrated with parliament, in the most mild and decent language. But Administration, sensible that we should regard these oppressive measures as freemen ought to do, sent over fleets and armies to enforce them. The indignation of the Americans was roused, it is true; but it was the indignation of a virtuous, loyal, and affectionate people. A Congress of Delegates from the United Colonies was assembled at Philadelphia, on the fifth day of last September. We resolved again to offer an humble and dutiful petition to the King, and also addressed our fellow-subjects of Great Britain. We have pursued every temperate, every respectful measure: we have even proceeded to break off our commercial intercourse with our fellow-subjects, as the last peaceable admonition, that our attachment to no nation upon earth should supplant our attachment to liberty.-This, we flattered ourselves, was the ultimate step of the controversy: But subsequent events have shewn, how vain was this hope of finding moderation in our enemies.

Several threatening expressions against the colonies were inserted in his Majesty’s speech; our petition, though we were told it was a decent one, and that his Majesty had been pleased to receive it graciously, and to promise laying it before his Parliament, was huddled into both houses amongst a bundle of American papers, and there neglected. The Lords and Commons in their address, in the month of February, said, that “a rebellion at that time actually existed within the province of Massachusetts bay; and that those concerned in it, had been countenanced and encouraged by unlawful combinations and engagements, entered into by his Majesty’s subjects in several of the other colonies; and therefore they besought his Majesty, that he would take the most effectual measures to enforce due obedience to the laws and authority of the supreme legislature.”-Soon after, the commercial intercourse of whole colonies, with foreign countries, and with each other, was cut off by an act of Parliament; by another, several of them were entirely prohibited from the fisheries in the seas near their coasts, on which they always depended for their sustenance; and large re-inforcements of ships and troops were immediately sent over to General Gage.

Fruitless were all the entreaties, arguments, and eloquence of an illustrious band of the most distinguished Peers, and Commoners, who nobly and strenuously asserted the justice of our cause, to stay, or even to mitigate the heedless fury with which these accumulated and unexampled outrages were hurried on.-Equally fruitless was the interference of the city of London, of Bristol, and many other respectable towns in our favour. Parliament adopted an insidious manoeuvre calculated to divide us, to establish a perpetual auction of taxations where colony should bid against colony, all of them uninformed what ransom would redeem their lives; and thus to extort from us, at the point of the bayonet, the unknown sums that should be sufficient to gratify, if possible to gratify, ministerial rapacity, with the miserable indulgence left to us of raising, in our own mode, the prescribed tribute. What terms more rigid and humiliating could have been dictated by remorseless victors to conquered enemies? In our circumstances to accept them, would be to deserve them.

Soon after the intelligence of these proceedings arrived on this continent, General Gage, who in the course of the last year had taken possession of the town of Boston, in the province of Massachusetts Bay, and still occupied it as a garrison, on the 19th day of April, sent out from that place a large detachment of his army, who made an unprovoked assault on the inhabitants of the said province, at the town of Lexington, as appears by the affidavits of a great number of persons, some of whom were officers and soldiers of that detachment, murdered eight of the inhabitants, and wounded many others. From thence the troops proceeded in warlike array to the town of Concord, where they set upon another party of the inhabitants of the same province, killing several and wounding more, until compelled to retreat by the country people suddenly assembled to repel this cruel aggression. Hostilities, thus commenced by the British troops, have been since prosecuted by them without regard to faith or reputation.-The inhabitants of Boston being confined within that town by the General their Governor, and having, in order to procure their dismission, entered into a treaty with him, it was stipulated that the said inhabitants having deposited their arms with their own magistrates, should have liberty to depart, taking with them their other effects. They accordingly delivered up their arms, but in open violation of honor, in defiance of the obligation of treaties, which even savage nations esteemed sacred, the Governor ordered the arms deposited as aforesaid, that they might be preserved for their owners, to be seized by a body of soldiers; detained the greatest part of the inhabitants in the town, and compelled the few who were permitted to retire, to leave their most valuable effects behind.

By this perfidy wives are separated from their husbands, children from their parents, the aged and the sick from their relations and friends, who wish to attend and comfort them; and those who have been used to live in plenty and even elegance, are reduced to deplorable distress.

The General, further emulating his ministerial masters, by a proclamation bearing date on the 12th day of June, after venting the grossest falsehoods and calumnies against the good people of these colonies, proceeds to “declare them all, either by name or description, to be rebels and traitors, to supersede the course of the common law, and instead thereof to publish and order the use and exercise of the law martial.”-His troops have butchered our countrymen, have wantonly burnt Charles-Town, besides a considerable number of houses in other places; our ships and vessels are seized; the necessary supplies of provisions are intercepted, and he is exerting his utmost power to spread destruction and devastation around him.

We have received certain intelligence that General Carleton, the Governor of Canada, is instigating the people of that province and the Indians to fall upon us; and we have but too much reason to apprehend, that schemes have been formed to excite domestic enemies against us. In brief, a part of these colonies now feels, and all of them are sure of feeling, as far as the vengance of administration can inflict them, the complicated calamities of fire, sword, and famine.-We are reduced to the alternative of chusing an unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers, or resistance by force.-The latter is our choice.-We have counted the cost of this contest, and find nothing so dreadful as voluntary slavery.-Honor, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them, if we basely entail hereditary bondage upon them.

Our cause is just. Our union is perfect. Our internal resources are great, and, if necessary, foreign assistance is undoubtedly attainable.-We gratefully acknowledge, as signal instances of the Divine favour towards us, that his Providence would not permit us to be called into this severe controversy, until we were grown up to our present strength, had been previously exercised in warlike operation, and possessed of the means of defending ourselves,-With hearts fortified with these animating reflections, we most solemnly, before God and the world, declare, that, exerting the utmost energy of those powers, which our beneficent Creator hath graciously bestowed upon us, the arms we have been compelled by our enemies to assume, we will, in defiance of every hazard, with unabating firmness and perseverance, employ for the preservation of our liberties; being with our [one] mind resolved to dye Free-men rather than live Slaves.

Lest this declaration should disquiet the minds of our friends and fellow-subjects in any part of the empire, we assure them that we mean not to dissolve that Union which has so long and so happily subsisted between us, and which we sincerely wish to see restored.-Necessity has not yet driven us into that desperate measure, or induced us to excite any other nation to war against them.-We have not raised armies with ambitious designs of separating from Great Britain, and establishing independent states. We fight not for glory or for conquest. We exhibit to mankind the remarkable spectacle of a people attacked by unprovoked enemies, without any imputation or even suspicion of offence. They boast of their privileges and civilization, and yet proffer no milder conditions than servitude or death.

In our own native land, in defence of the freedom that is our birth-right, and which we ever enjoyed till the late violation of it-for the protection of our property, acquired solely by the honest industry of our fore-fathers and ourselves, against violence actually offered, we have taken up arms. We shall lay them down when hostilities shall cease on the part of the aggressors, and all danger of their being renewed shall be removed, and not before.

With an humble confidence in the mercies of the supreme and impartial Judge and Ruler of the universe, we most devoutly implore his divine goodness to protect us happily through this great conflict, to dispose our adversaries to reconciliation on reasonable terms, and thereby to relieve the empire from the calamities of civil war.

By order of Congress,

JOHN HANCOCK,

President.

Attested,

CHARLES THOMSON,

Secretary.”  https://history.army.mil/books/revwar/ss/revdoc.htm

 

Posted in Articles | 15 Comments